Test-retest reliability study of the Physical Work Performance Evaluation;Étude de fidélité test-retest de l'évaluation des capacités physiques reliées au travail

Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 206-214

  Brassard, Bruno ^a   Durand, Marie José ^b,c   Loisel, Patrick ^b,c   Lemaire, Jacques ^a,d  

^a Université de Sherbrooke ^*  (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c Centre d'Action en Prevention et Readaptation de l'Incapacite au Travail CAPRIT   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Functional capacity evaluation; Test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENIENCE SAMPLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MANUAL LABOR; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; OCCUPATION; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL WORK PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; WORK CAPACITY; ARTICLE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION;

EID: 33750457018     PISSN: 00084174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000841740607300405     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Agel, J., Akesson, K., Amadio, P. C., Anderson, M., Badley, E., Balint, G., et Bellamy, N. (2003). The burden of musculoskletal conditions at the start of the new millenium. Geneva: World Health Organization.
2. Bonett, D. G. (2002). Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1331-1335. doi:10.1002/sim.1108
3. Brassard, B. (2003). Étude de fidélité test-retest et de sensibilité au changement de l'Évaluation des Capacités Physiques de Travail. Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec.
4. Bravo, G., et Potvin, L. (1991). Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: Toward the integration of two traditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 381-390.
5. Brazier, J., Jones, N., et Kind, P. (1993). Testing the validity of the EuroQOL and comparing it with the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 2, 169-180.
6. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted Kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220.
7. Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (2002a). Statistiques sur les affections vertébrales; 1998-2001. Québec: Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail.
8. Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (2002b). Statistiques sur les lésions en « ITE »du système musculo-squelettique, 1998-2001. Québec: Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail.
9. Coyte, P. C., Asche, C. V., Croxford, R., et Chan, B. (1998). The economic cost of musculoskeletal disordes in Canada. Arthritis Care and Research, 11, 315-325.
10. Dionne, C. E. (1999). Low back pain. Dans I. K. Crombie (Édit), Epidemiology of pain (p. 283 à 297). Seattle, WA: IASP Press.
11. Douglas, W. (1985). Questionnaire d'évaluation des habitudes de vie (Traduit et adapté avec la permission du Fantastic Lifestyle Assessment). Hamilton, ON: Department of Family Medecine, McMaster University.
12. Durand, M. J., Loisel, P., Poitras, S., Mercier, R., Stock, S. R., et Lemaire, J. (2004). The inter-rater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: The Physical Work Performance Evaluation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 14, 119-129. doi: 10.1023/B:JOOR.0000018328.35521.e8
13. Feinstein, A. R., et Cichetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543-549.
14. Gibson, L., et Strong, J. (1997). A review of functional capacity evaluation practice. Work: a journal of prevention, assessment and rehabilitation, 9, 3-11.
15. Hart, D. L., Isernhagen, S. J., et Matheson, L. N. (1993). Guidelines for functional capacity evaluation of people with medical conditions. Journal of Orthopaedic et Sports Physical Therapy, 18, 682-686.
16. Harten, J. A. (1998). Functional capacity evaluation. Occupational Medicine, 13, 209-212.
17. Innes, E., et Straker, L. (1998). A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 1-purposes and problems. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 11, 183-189.
18. Innes, E., et Straker, L. (1999a). Reliability of work-related assessments. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 13, 107-124.
19. Innes, E., et Straker, L. (1999b). Validity of work-related assessments. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 13, 125-152.
20. Kennedy, L. E., et Bhambhani, Y. N. (1991). The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator: Reliability and validity at three work intensities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 511-516.
21. King, P. M., Tuckwell, N., et Barrett, T. E. (1998). A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Physical Therapy, 78, 852-866.
22. Landis, J. R., et Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
23. Lechner, D., Roth, D., et Straaton, K. (1991). Functional capacity evaluation in work disability. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 1, 37-47.
24. Lechner, D. E., Jackson, J. R., Roth, D. L., et Straaton, K. V. (1994). Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 36, 997-1004.
25. Loisel, P., Abenhaim, L., Durand, P., Esdaile, J. M., Suissa, S., Gosselin, L., Simard, R., Turcotte, J., et Lemaire, J. (1997). A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine, 22, 2911-2918. doi:10.1097/00007632-199712150-00014
26. Matheson, L. N., Mooney, V., Grant, J. E., Affleck, M., Hall, H., Melles, T, Lichter, R. L., et McIntosh, G. (1995). A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 1-Development and reliability testing. Spine, 20, 2119-2129.
27. McHorney, C. A., Kosinski, M., et Ware, J. E. (1994). Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 Health Survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey. Medical Care, 32, 551-567.
28. Nachemson, A. (1999). Back pain: Delimiting the problem in the next millennium. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 473-490.
29. Pransky, G. S. et Dempsey, G. P. (2004). Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 14, 217-229. doi: 10.1023/B:JOOR.0000022763.61656.b1
30. Rudy, T., Lieber, S. J., et Boston, J. R. (1996). Functional capacity assessment: Influence of behavioral and environmental factors. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 6, 277-288.
31. Speller, L., Trollinger, J. A., Maurer, P. A., Nelson, C. E., et Bauer, D. F. (1997). Comparison of the test-retest reliability of the Work Box using three administrative methods. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(7), 516-522.
32. Staal, J. B., Hlobil, H., van Tulder, M. W., Köke, A. J. A., Smid, T., et van Mechelen, W. (2002). Return-to-work interventions for low back pain. Sports Medicine, 32, 251-267.
33. Tramposh, A. K. (1992). The functional capacity evaluation: Measuring maximal work abilities. Occupational Medicine, 7, 113-124.
34. Tuckwell, N. L., Straker, L., et Barrett, T. E. (2002). Test-retest reliability on nine tasks of the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 19, 243-253.
35. US Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration, E. a. T. (1991). Revised Dictionary of Occupational Titles (4th ed.) (Vol I and II). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
36. Vallerand, R. (1989). Vers une méthodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue française. Psychologie canadienne, 30, 662-680.
37. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., et Keller, S. D. (1998). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health summary scales (3rd ed.). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated.