The potential distribution of Zorotypus hubbardi caudell (Zoraptera: Zorotypidae) in North America, as predicted by ecological niche modeling

Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 860-867

  Hinojosa Díaz, Ismael A ^a   Bonaccorso, Elisa ^a   Engel, Michael S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological niche; Polyneoptera; Predictive modeling; Zorapteran; Zorotypus

Indexed keywords

ZORAPTERA; ZOROTYPIDAE; ZOROTYPUS; ZOROTYPUS HUBBARDI;

EID: 33750455492     PISSN: 00138797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson, R. P., D. Lew, and A. T. Peterson. 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: Criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecological Modeling 162: 211-232.
2. Engel, M. S. 2001. New neotropical records for three Zorotypus species (Zoraptera: Zorotypidae). Entomological News 112: 278-280.
3. -. 2003a. Zoraptera, pp. 1201-1203. In Resh, V. H. and R. T. Cardé, eds. Encyclopedia of Insects. Academic Press, San Diego.
4. -. 2003b. Phylogeny of the Zoraptera. Entomologische Abhandlungen 61: 147-148.
5. -. 2004. Zoraptera, pp. 637-640. In Llorente-Bousquets, J., J. J. Morrone, O. YáñezOrdóñez, and I. Fernandez-Vargas, eds. Biodiversidad, Taxonomía y Biogeografía de Artrópodos de México: Hacia una Síntesis de su Conocimiento, Volumen IV. UNAM, México, D.F.
6. Engel, M. S. and D. A. Grimaldi. 2000. A winged Zorotypus in Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic (Zoraptera: Zorotypidae), with discussion on relationships of and within the order. Acta Geologica Hispanica 35: 149-164.
7. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Inc. 2002. ArcView 3.3. 380 New York St., Redlands.
8. Feria, T. P. and A. T. Peterson. 2002. Using point occurrence data and inferential algorithms to predict local communities of birds. Diversity and Distributions 8: 49-56.
9. Grimaldi, D. and M. S. Engel. 2005. Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Grinnell, J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. American Naturalist 51: 115-128.
11. Huang, F.-S. 1980. The order Zoraptera and its geographical distribution, pp. 1087-1090. In Liu, D.-S., ed. Geological and Ecological Studies of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau: Proceedings of Symposium on Quinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau. Science Press, Beijing.
12. MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. Harper & Row, New York.
13. Peterson, A. T. 2001. Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor 103: 599-605.
14. Peterson, A. T. and K. C. Cohoon. 1999. Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness. Ecological Modeling 117: 159-164.
15. Peterson, A. T. and J. Shaw. 2003. Lutzomyia vectors for cutaneous leishmaniasis in southern Brazil: Ecological niche models, predicted geographic distributions, and climate change effects. International Journal for Parasitology 33: 919-931.
16. Peterson, A. T. and D. A. Vieglais. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling. BioScience 51: 363-371.
17. Peterson, A. T., M. Papes, and D. A. Kluza. 2003. Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Science 51: 863-868.
18. Rice, N. H., E. Martínez-Meyer, and A. T. Peterson. 2003. Ecological niche differentiation in the Aphelocoma jays: A phylogenetic perspective. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 80: 369-383.
19. Rios, N. and H. Bart. 2005. GEOLocate Georeferencing Software for Natural History Collections. URL http://www.museum.tulane.edu/ geolocate
20. Stockwell, D. R. B. 1999. Genetic algorithms II, pp. 123-144. In Fielding, A. H., ed. Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
21. Stockwell, D. R. B. and I. R. Noble. 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: A robust and informative method of analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 33: 385-390.
22. Stockwell, D. R. B. and D. P. Peters. 1999. The GARP modeling system: Problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 13: 143-158.
23. Stockwell, D. R. B. and A. T. Peterson. 2002. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modeling 148: 1-13.
24. -. 2003. Comparison of resolution of methods used in mapping biodiversity patterns from point occurrence data. Ecological Indicators 3: 213-221.