Towards a continuum of scholarship: The eventual collapse of the distinction between grey and non-grey literature

Publishing Research Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 4-11

  Banks, Marcus A ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750448694     PISSN: 10538801     EISSN: 19364792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12109-006-0002-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Royal Society: Brief History of the Society. http:/lwww.royalsoc.ac.uk/ page.asp?id=2176 [Accessed 21 November 2005].
2. Conn VS, Valentine JC, Cooper HM, and Rantz MJ. (2003), Gray literature in meta-analyses. In: Nursing Research, 52 (4) July-August 2003, pp. 256-61. - 1SSN 0029-6562
3. Center for Science in the Public Interest: Integrity in Science Conference. http://www.cspinet.org/integrity/conflictedscience-conf.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
4. Wilson B. (2003), Improving access to STM literature: the need for continuing dialogue. In: D-Lib Magazine, 9 (6) June 2003. - ISSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http:llwww.dlib.orgldlib/june03106editorial.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
5. Lynch C.A. (2003), Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. In: ARLBimonthly Report, 226, February 2003, pp. 1-7. Available online at: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
6. SPARC Open Access Newsletter: Open Access in 2003. http://www.earlham. edu/-peters/fos/newsletter/01-02-04.htm#2003 [Accessed 21 November 2005].
7. Timeline of the Open Access Movement. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/ fosltimeline.htm [Accessed 21 November 2005].
8. FOS Forum: Eddy van der Maarel Statement. http:l/lists.topica.com/lists/ fos-forumlread/message.html?mid=902159566&sort=d&start=44 [Accessed 21 November 2005].
9. The impact of serial costs on library collections. In: ARL Bimonthly Report, 218, October 2001, p. 9.Available online at: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/ 218/costimpact.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
10. Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. http://www.arl.org/sparc/[Accessed 21 November 2005].
11. Original Proposal for E-biomed (Draft and Addendum). http://ww w.nih.gov/about/director/pubmedcentral/ebiomedarch.htm [Accessed 21 November 2005].
12. Kling R, Fortuna J, King A. (2002), The Remarkable Transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central. Available online at: http://rkcsi.indiana.edu/ archive/CS1/WP/wp01-03B.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
13. Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing. http://www.arl.org/scomm/tempe.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
14. Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].
15. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. http://www.earlham.edu/ ~peterslfoslbethesda.htm [Accessed 21 November 2005].
16. Public Access to Science Act. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi- binlgetdoc.cgi?dbname=108-cong-bills&docid=f:h2613ih.txt.pdf [Accessed 21 November 2005].
17. Public Access Home Page. http://publicaccess.nih,gov/[Accessed 21 November 2005].
18. NIH Public Access: September 2005 Submission Statistics. http://nihms.nih.gov/stats/2005-09.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
19. Open Access a Must for Wellcome Trust Researchers. http://www.wellcome. ac.uk/doc-WTX026822.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
20. ATA: The Alliance for Taxpayer Access. http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/ [Accessed 21 November 2005].
21. Gray BH. (1998), Sources used in health policy research and implications for information retrieval systems. In: Journal of Urban Health, 75 (4), December 1998, pp. 842-852. - ISSN 1099-3460.
22. New York Academy of Medicine Library: Grey Literature Report. http://www.nyam.org/library/greyreport.shtml [Accessed 21 November 2005].
23. CNLP: Research Projects. http://www.cnlp.org/research/project.asp?recid= 34 [Accessed 21 November 2005].
24. arXiv.org e-Print Archive. http://arxiv.org/[Accessed 21 November 2005].
25. Welcome to the NDIIPP. http://digitalpreservation.gov/[Accessed 21 November 2005].
26. Self-Archiving FAQ. http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/self-faq/[Accessed 21 November 2005].
27. Overture: The Subversive Proposal. http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/ sub01.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
28. Dspace Federation. http://dspace.org/[Accessed 21 November 2005].
29. Dspace Instances: Dspace Wiki. http://wiki.dspace.org/Dspacelnstances [Accessed 21 November 2005].
30. Lynch C.A. (2003), Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age, In: ARL Bimonthly Report, 226, February 2003, pp. 1-7. Available online at: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
31. Foster NF, Gibbons, S. (2005), Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories, In: D-Lib Magazine, 11 (1) January 2005. - 1SSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/ foster/01 foster.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
32. Ware M. (2004), Institutional repositories and scholarly publishing. In: Learned Publishing, 17 (2) April 2004 - ISSN 0953-1513.
33. van Westrienen G, Lynch CA. (2005), Academic institutional repositories: deployment status in 13 nations as of mid 2005. In: D-Lib Magazine, 11 (9) September 2005. - ISSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ september05/westrienen/09westrienen.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].
34. Lynch CA, Lippincott JK. Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005. In: D-Lib Magazine, 11 (9) September 2005. - ISSN 1082-9873. Available online at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/lynch/ 091ynch.html [Accessed 21 November 2005].