Emerging trends in state regulation of private communities in the U.S.

GeoJournal

Volumn 66, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 89-102

  McKenzie, Evan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; California; Common interest housing developments; Florida; Homeowners associations; Legal conflicts; Legislation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ARIZONA; CALIFORNIA; COMMON INTEREST HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS; FLORIDA; HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS; LEGAL CONFLICTS; LEGISLATION;

URBAN PLANNING;

GATED COMMUNITY; HOUSING ASSOCIATION; HOUSING MANAGEMENT; HOUSING POLICY; LEGISLATION; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT;

ARIZONA; CALIFORNIA; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750437304     PISSN: 03432521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10708-006-9019-y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Askin, F. (1998). Free speech, private space, and the constitution. Rutgers Law Journal, 29(3), 947-961.
2. California Law Revision Commission (2004). Tentative recommendation: State assistance to common interest developments. CLRC document number H-853. Palo Alto: California Law Revision Commission.
3. Community Associations Institute (2003). Rights and responsibilities for better communities. Alexandria: Community Associations Institute. http://www.caion-line.org/rightsandresponsibilities/rights.pdf (accessed 29 August 2004).
4. Community Associations Institute (2004). Data on U.S. community associations. http://www.caionline.org/about/facts.cfm (accessed 29 August 2004).
5. French, S. (2000). Scope of study of laws affecting common interest developments California Law Revision Commission Study H-850. Palo Alto: California Law Revision Commission.
6. Gutai, F. (1999). Le Parc community faces financial crisis. Ventura County Star. August 15, Section B, p. 8.
7. Low, S. (2003). Behind the gates: Life, security and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. London: Routledge.
8. Mansnerus, L. (2002). Lawsuit tests power of homeowner associations. New York Times, August 13, Section B, p. 1.
9. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. McKenzie, E. (1998a). Reinventing common interest developments: Reflections on a policy role for the judiciary. John Marshall Law Review, 31(2), 397-427.
11. McKenzie, E. (1998b). Homeowner associations and California politics: An exploratory analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 34(1), 52-75.
12. McKenzie, E. (1999). Doing well, doing good, or doing both? Rethinking the practice of community association law. Journal of Community Association Law, 2(1), 38-43.
13. McKenzie, E. (2003). Common interest housing in the communities of tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate, 14(12), 203-234.
14. McKenzie, E. (2005). Constructing the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A case study of emerging trends in American gated communities. Housing Studies, 20(2), 187-203.
15. Miller, K., & Delaney, K. (2002). Can judgments against homeowners associations nab homeowners? California Litigation, 15, 1.
16. Pearlstein, M. (2004). The Illinois Legislative Action Committee: The chapter's link to effective legislation. Common Interest, 9(3), 18-20.
17. Rich, M. (2003). Homeowner boards blur line of just who rules the roost. New York Times, July 27, p. 1.
18. Sappenfield, M. (2004). The backlash against homeowners' groups. Christian Science Monitor, October 14. http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1014/ p01s02-ussc.html (accessed October 14, 2004).
19. Select Committee on Condominium Association Governance (2004). First report and recommendations. January 21. http://www.ccfj.net/condoHSCreport.html (accessed February 24, 2004).
20. Siegel, S. (1998). The Constitution and private government. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 6(2), 461-563.
21. Sullivan, J. (2004). A private community trumps public dissent. New York Times, February 22, Section 14 NJ, p. 6.
22. Wasserman, J. (2004). Owners, associations, at odds: Lost home highlights clash. Chicago Tribune (online edition). http://www.chicagotribune.com/ classified/realestate/newhomes/chi-0402140015feb14,1,2181093.story (accessed February 14, 2004).
23. Yi, D. (2004a). Panel hears home horror stories. Los Angeles Times, February 18, Part B, p. 6.
24. Yi, D. (2004b). Homeowner groups' power to foreclose is under attack. Los Angeles Times, June 7, Part B, p. 1.