Controversial maps: Spatial visualisation as argument in policy discourses

Nederlandse Geografische Studies

Volumn , Issue 344, 2006, Pages 157-170

  Carton, Linda ^a   Enserink, Bert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION; MAP; POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION; WATER BUDGET; WATER PLANNING;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33750419053     PISSN: 01694839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bertin, J. (1967), Diagrammes, réseaux, cartographie: Sémiologie graphique. France: Gauthier-Villars. English version:
2. J. Bertin (1983), The semiology of graphies: Diagrams, networks, maps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bobrow, D.B. & J.S. Dryzek (1987), Policy analysis by design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press.
4. Carton, L.J. (2002), Strengths and weaknesses of spatial language: Mapping activities as debating instrument. In: Conference Proceedings International Federation of Surveying (FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, D.C., April 19-26 2002).
5. Carton, L.J. (forthcoming), Reticence of the map: How making and using spatial models frames participative policy analysis processes (dissertation, working title). Delft: Eburon.
6. Craig, W.J., M. Trevor & D. Weiner, eds. (2002), Community participation and Geographic Information Systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
7. Delfland (2002), Waterkansenkaart Delfland: Watereisen, waterwensen en waterkansen voor deelgebied Oostland. Samenvatting. Delft: Hoogheemraadschap van Delfland.
8. Edelenbos, J., R. Monnikhof & O. Van de Riet (2003), A Double Helix approach: A proposal to forge a better integration of analysis and policy development. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 3(1), pp.1-21.
9. Faludi, A. & B. Waterhout (2002), The making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No masterplan. London: Routledge.
10. Harley, J.B. (1989), Deconstructing the map. Cartographica 26(2), pp. 1-20.
11. Korzybski, A. (1933) Science and Sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. New York: Institute of General Semantics.
12. Mayer, I.S., C.E. Van Daalen & P.W.G. Bots (2004), Perspectives on policy analyses: A framework for understanding and design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 4(2), pp. 169-191.
13. Monmonnier, M. (1991), How to lie with maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Priemus, H. (2004), Strategisch plan TBM 2004-2010. Delft: Faculty Technology, Policy and Management.
15. Schön, D. A. (1983), The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
16. Schön, D.A. & M. Rein (1994), Frame reflection: Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
17. Stone, D.A. (1988), Political paradox and political reasoning. USA: HarperCollins Publishers.
18. Thissen, W.A.H. & P.G.J. Twaalfhoven (2001), Towards a conceptual structure for evaluating policy analytic activities. European Journal of Operational Research 129(3), pp. 627-649.
19. Ulied, A. & M. Guevara (1999), The missing dragon: Mapping European spatial policy in the 21st century. Barcelona: Merit.
20. Van Eeten, M.J.G. & E.F. ten Heuvelhof (1998), 'Servicable truth': De proces-contingente inzet van wetenschappelijke expertise. In: R. Hoppe & A. Peterse, eds., Bouwstenen voor argumentatieve beleidsanalyse. The Hague: Elsevier.
21. Van Eeten, M.J.G. (1999), Dialogues of the deaf: Defining new agendas for environmental deadlocks (dissertation). Delft: Eburon.
22. Vigar, G. & P. Healey (2002), Developing environmentally respectful policy programs: Five key principles. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45(4), pp. 517-532.