Comparison of naturally and synthetically baited spruce beetle trapping systems in the Central Rocky Mountains

Journal of Economic Entomology

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 373-382

  Hansen, E M ^a   Vandygriff, J C ^a   Cain, R J ^b   Wakarchuk, D ^c  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c Synergy Semiochemicals Corp   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bark beetle management; Funnel traps; Pheromones; Semiochemicals

Indexed keywords

COLEOPTERA; DENDROCTONUS RUFIPENNIS; PICEA; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 33750411901     PISSN: 00220493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jee/99.2.373     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amman, G. D. 1983. Strategy for reducing mountain pine beetle infestations with ponderosa pine trap logs. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Dep. Agric.-Forest Service. Res. Note INT-338.
2. Aukema, B. H., D. L. Dahlsten, and K. F. Raffa. 2000. Improved population monitoring of bark beetles and predators by incorporating disparate behavioral responses to semiochemicals. Environ. Entomol. 29: 618-629.
3. Bentz, B. J., and A. S. Munson. 2000. Spruce beetle population suppression in northern Utah. West. J. Appl. For. 15: 122-128.
4. Borden, J. 1989. Semiochemicals and bark beetle populations: exploitation of natural phenomena by pest management strategies. Holarctic Ecol. 12: 501-510.
5. Borden, J. H., G. Gries, L. J. Chong, R. A. Werner, E. H. Holsten, H. Wieser, E. A. Dixon, and H. F. Cerezke. 1996. Regionally-specific bioactivity of two new pheromones for Dendroctonus rufipennis (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 120: 321-326.
6. Buffam, P. E. 1971. Spruce beetle suppression in trap trees treated with cacodylic acid. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 958-960.
7. Burnside, R. E. 1991. Falls Creek trap tree sampling study, September 16-17, 1991. State of Alaska, Dept. Nat. Res., Div. For., File 9-3185.
8. Chansler, J. F., and D. A. Pierce. 1966. Bark beetle mortality in trees injected with cacodylic acid (herbicide). J. Econ. Entomol. 59: 1357-1359.
9. Chénier, J.V.R., and B.J.R. Philogéne. 1989. Evaluation of three trap designs for the capture of conifer-feeding beetles and other coleoptera. Can. Entomol. 121: 159-167.
10. Dahlsten, D. L., D. L. Six, D. L. Rowney, A. B. Lawson. N. Erbilgin, and K. F. Raffa. 2004. Attraction of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and its predators to natural attractants and synthetic semiochemicals in northern California: implications for population monitoring. Environ. Entomol. 33: 1554-1561.
11. Dodds, K. J., D. W. Ross, and G. E. Daterman. 2000. A comparison of traps and trap trees for capturing Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Entomol. Soc. Br. Columbia 97: 33-38.
12. Drumont, A., R. Gonzales, N. de Windt, J. C. Grégoire, M. de Proft, and E. Seutin. 1992. Semiochemicals and the integrated management of Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytidae) in Belgium. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 333-337.
13. Dyer, E.D.A., and J. A. Chapman. 1971. Attack by the spruce beetle induced by frontalin or billets with burrowing females. Can. For. Serv. Bimonthly Res. Notes 27: 10-11.
14. Dyer, E.D.A., and D. W. Taylor. 1968. Attractiveness of logs containing female spruce beetles, Dendroctonus obesus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 100: 769-776.
15. Dyer, E.D.A., P. M. Hall, and L. Safranyik. 1975. Numbers of Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby) and Thanasimus undatulus Say at pheromone baited poisoned and unpoisoned trees. J. Entomol. Soc. Br. Columbia. 72: 20-22.
16. Furniss, M. M., B. H. Baker, and B. B. Hostetler. 1976. Aggregation of spruce beetles (Coleoptera) to seudenol and repression of attraction by methycyclohexanone in Alaska. Can. Entomol. 108: 1297-1302.
17. Gara, R. I., and E. H. Holsten. 1975. Preliminary studies on Arctic bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) of the Noatak River drainage. Z. Angew. Entomol. 78: 248-254.
18. Gibson, K. E. 1984. Use of trap trees for the reduction of spruce beetle-caused mortality in old-growth Engelrnann spruce stands in the Northern Region. U.S. For. Serv., Forest Pest Manag., Northern Region, Missoula, Mo. Rep. 84-10.
19. Gray, D., E. H. Holsten, and M. Pascuzzo. 1990. Effects of semiochemical baiting on the attractiveness of felled and unfelled lethal trap trees for spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) management in areas of high and low beetle populations. Can. Entomol. 122: 373-379.
20. Hansen, E. M., and B. J. Bentz. 2003. Comparison of reproductive capacity among univoltine, semivoltine, and reemerged parent spruce beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 135: 697-712.
21. Hodgkinson, R. S. 1985. Use of trap trees for spruce beetle management in British Columbia, 1979-1984. Br. Columbia Ministry of Forests, Forest Pest Manag. Rep. No. 5.
22. Holsten, E. H., R. W. Thier, A. S. Munson, and K. E. Gibson. 1999. The spruce beetle. U.S. Dep. Agric.-For. Serv. For. Insect Dis. Leafl. 127.
23. Laidlaw, W. G., B. G. Prenzel, M. L. Reid, S. Fabris, and H. Wieser. 2003. Comparison of the efficacy of pheromone-baited traps, pheromone-baited trees, and felled trees for control of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 32: 477-483.
24. Lindgren, B. S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). Can. Entomol. 115: 299-302.
25. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
26. Lyon, R. L. 1958. A useful secondary sex character in Dendroctonus bark beetles. Can. Entomol. 90: 582-584.
27. Massey, C. L., and N. D. Wygant. 1954. Biology and control of the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. 944.
28. Moeck, H. A. 1978. Field test for primary attraction of the spruce beetle. Can. For. Serv. Bimonthly Res. Notes 34: 8.
29. Nagel, R. H., D. MeComb, and F. B. Knight. 1957. Trap tree method for controlling the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado. J. For. 55: 894-898.
30. Raty, L., A. Drumont, N. de Windt, and J. C. Grégoire. 1995. Mass trapping of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus L.: traps or trap trees? For. Ecol. Manag. 78: 191-205.
31. Ross, D. W., G. E. Daterman, and A. S. Munson. 2005. Spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) response to traps baited with selected semiochemicals in Utah. West. North Am. Nat. 65: 123-126.
32. Rudinsky, J. A., C. Sartwell, T. M. Graves, and M. E. Morgan. 1974. Granular formulation of methylcyclohexenone: an antiaggregative pheromone of the Douglas fir and spruce bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae). Z. Angew. Entomol. 75: 254-263.
33. Schaupp, W. C., and M. Frank. 2000. Spruce beetle evaluation - 1999: Hahns Peak / Bears Ears Ranger District and surrounding areas, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests, Colorado. U.S. For. Serv. Biol. Eval. R2-00-05, Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, CO.
34. Schinid, J. M. 1981. Spruce beetles in blowdown. U.S. Dep. Agric.-For. Serv. Res. Note RM-411.
35. Schmid, J. M., and R. H. Frye. 1977. Spruce beetle in the Rockies. U.S. Dep. Agric.-For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-49.
36. Thier, R. W., and A. Patterson. 1997. Mortality of Douglas-fir after operational semiochemical baiting for Douglas-fir beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). West. J. Appl. For. 12: 16-20.