Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model: FRBR and the bibliographic universe

Library Resources and Technical Services

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 264-273

  Carlyle, Allyson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750391466     PISSN: 00242527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5860/lrts.50n4.264     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records, UBCIM Publications New Series, 19 (München: K.G. Saur, 1998). Also available at www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf (accessed Nov. 8, 2005).
2. For an excellent brief introduction to FRBR, see Barbara Tillett, What is FRBR? A Conceptual Model for the Bibliographic Universe (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service, 2004), www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/ FRBR.PDF (accessed Nov. 8, 2005).
3. Wordnet: A Lexical Database for the English Language, "Model," http://wordnet.princeton.edu (accessed Sept. 30, 2005).
4. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 2000).
5. Hyperdictionary, "Model," www.hyperdictionary.com/search.aspx? define=model (accessed July 2, 2004).
6. American Heritage Dictionary.
7. Marcia J. Bates, "An Introduction to Metatheories, Theories, and Models," in Theories of Information Behavior, ed. K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, and E. F. McKechnie (Medford, N.J.: Information Today, 2005), 3.
8. U. Mäki, "Models, Metaphors, Narrative, and Rhetoric: Philosophical Aspects," in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001), 9932.
9. U. Mäki, "Models, Metaphors, Narrative, and Rhetoric: Philosophical Aspects," in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (2001), 9932. Ibid.
10. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records, 16.
11. Michael Buckland, "Information As Thing," Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42, no. 5 (1991): 355.
12. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Record, 26.
13. Peter P. Chen, "The Entity-Relationship Model-Toward a Unified View of Data," ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1, no. 1 (1976): 9-36.
14. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records, 2.
15. INDECS Framework Ltd., INDECS, Interoperability of Data in E-commerce System, www.indecs.org (accessed Nov. 8, 2005).
16. British Museum, Catalogue of Printed Books in the British Museum, vol. 1 (London: Trustees of the British Museum, 1841).
17. Julia Pettee, "The Development of Authorship Entry and the Formulation of Authorship Rules As Found in the AngloAmerican Code," Library Quarterly 6, no. 3 (1936): 270;
18. see also Martha M. Yee, "What Is a Work?" Parts 1-4, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 19, no. 1: 9-28;
19. Martha M. Yee, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19, no. 2: 5-22;
20. Martha M. Yee, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 20, no. 1: 25-46;
21. Martha M. Yee, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, no. 2: 3-24;
22. and Richard Smiraglia, The Nature of "A Work": Implications for the Organization of Knowledge (Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow, 2001) for overviews of the history of the concept of work.
23. International Federation of Library Associations (Committee on Cataloguing), Statement of Principles Adopted at the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles. Paris, October, 1961. Annotated Edition with Commentaries and Examples by Eva Verona (London: IFLA Committee on Cataloguing, 1971).
24. Allyson Carlyle, "Fulfilling the Second Objective in the Online Catalog: Schemes for Organizing Author and Work Records into Usable Displays," Library Resources & Technical Services 41, no. 2 (Apr. 1997): 79-100;
25. Allyson Carlyle, "Creating Efficient and Systematic Catalogs," in The Future of Cataloging: Insights from the Lubetzky Symposium, April 18, 1998 University of California, Los Angeles, eds. Tschera Harkness Connell and Robert L. Maxwell (Chicago: ALA, 2000), 42-59.
26. Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., 2002 rev. (Ottawa: Canadian Library Assn.; London: Library Assn. Publishing; Chicago: ALA, 2002).
27. Patrick Wilson, Two Kinds of Power: An Essay on Bibliographical Control (Berkeley, Calif.: Univ. of California Pr., 1968), 7;
28. Eva Verona, "Literary Unit Versus Bibliographical Unit," Libri 9, no. 2 (1959): 98-99.
29. Wilson, Two Kinds of Power, 6.
30. Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., 2002 rev., rules 25.18A11 and 25.22A.
31. Elaine Svenonius, The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Pr., 2000).
32. John Espley, "Expressions," online posting, May 2, 2003, FRBR electronic discussion list, 2005, www.ifla.org/VII/s13/ wgfrbr/archive/ FRBR_Listserv_Archive.pdf (accessed Oct. 6, 2005).
33. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records, 18.
34. Mathew Beacom, "Expressions," online posting and following discussion thread, May 23, 2003, FRBR electronic discussion list, www.ifla.org/VII/s13/wgfrbr/archive/FRBR_Listserv _Archive.pdf (accessed Nov. 14, 2005).
35. Barbara T. Tillett, "Expressions," online posting, May 7, 2003, FRBR electronic discussion list, www.ifla.org/VII/s13/wgfrbr/ archive/FRBR_Listserv_Archive.pdf (accessed Oct. 6, 2005).
36. Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the AngloAmerican Cataloguing Rules, Prospectus for RDA: Resource Description and Access (Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2005), www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/rdaprospectus.html (accessed Nov. 8, 2005).