Retrospective evaluation of temporary cemented, tooth and implant supported fixed partial dentures

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2006, Pages 86-90

  HEINEMANN, Friedhelm ^a,b   MUNDT, Torsten ^a   BIFFAR, Reiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b Morsbach Lichtenberg ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

fixed partial denture; Implant; temporary cement; tooth implant

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC CEMENT; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; GOLD; TITANIUM; TOOTH CEMENT; URETHAN; ZINC OXIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLEANING; COLOR; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

ADULT; AGED; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33750379234     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1010-5182(06)60019-X     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Akashi A., Francischone C., Tokutsune E., and da Silva W. Effects of different types of temporary cements on the tensile strength and marginal adaption of crowns on implants. J Adhes Dent 4 (2002) 309-315
2. Bernal G., Okamura M., and Muñoz C. The effect of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 12 (2001) 111-115
3. Block M., Lirette D., Gardiner D., Li L., Finger I., Hochstedler J., Evans G., Kent J., Misiek D., Mendez A., Guerra L., Larsen H., Wood W., and Worthington P. Prospective evaluation of implants connected to tooth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 (2002) 473-487
4. Brägger U., Aeschlimann S., Burgin W., Hämmerle C., and Lang N. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 (2001) 26-34
5. Gunne J., Astrand P., Lindh T., Borg K., and Olsson M. Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: A 10-year report. Int J Prosthodont 12 (1999) 216-221
6. Hebel K., and Gajjar R. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 28-35
7. Hosny M., Duyck J., van Steenberghe D., and Naert I. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-implant fixed partial prostheses: Up to 14-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 13 (2000) 340-346
8. Jemt T., Lekholm U., and Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 (1989) 211-217
9. Kindberg H., Gunne J., and Kronström M. Tooth-and implant supported prostheses: A retrospective clinical follow-up to 8 years. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001) 575-581
10. Lang N., Pjetursson B., Tan K., Brägger U., Egger M., and Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth-implant supported FPDs. Clin Oral Impl Res 15 (2004) 643-653
11. Lindh T., Gunne J., Nystrom E., and Back T. Implant versus tooth-implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: A 2-year report. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 (2001) 441-449
12. Michalakis K., Pissiotis A., and Hirayama H. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 (2000) 545-549
13. Naert I., Duyck J., Hosny M., and van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Part I: An up to 15-years clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 (2001) 237-244
14. Tangerud T., Grønningsæter A., and Taylor A. Fixed partial denture supported by natural teeth and Brånemark system implants: A 3-year report. Int J Maxillofac Implants 17 (2002) 212-219