Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT 2) parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure glaucoma: A comparative study in an Indian population

Ophthalmic Epidemiology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 343-350

  Thomas, Ravi ^a   Muliyil, Jayprakash ^b   Simha R , Arthi ^a   Parikh, Rajul S ^a  

^a L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

^b CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Cup shape measure; Developing countries; Glaucoma; Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph; India; Moorefield regression analysis; Optic disc damage; Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma; Primary Open Angle Glaucoma; Visual field defects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INDIAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INDIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33750377152     PISSN: 09286586     EISSN: 17445086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09286580600850983     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:389-393.
2. Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull WHO. 1995;73:115-121.
3. Thomas R, Jacob A, Muliyil JP, et al. Prevalence of primary glaucomas in an urban South Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1998;46:81-86.
4. Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1710-1716.
5. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Baginski TA, et al. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of larger optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:357-363.
6. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464
7. Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumanee AE. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss: I. Methods and changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1444-1448.
8. Read RM, Spaeth GL. The practical clinical appraisal of the optic disc in glaucoma: the natural history of cup progression and some disc-field correlation. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974;78:255-274.
9. Oldelberg T, Riise D. Early diagnosis of glaucoma. The value of successive stereophotography of the optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985;63:257-263.
10. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:77-83.
11. Jones JB, Grundler AE. Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disc variables in the open angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:488-497.
12. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1414-1424.
13. Spaeth GL. In: Varma R, Spaeth G, Parker KW, eds. The Optic Nerve in Glaucoma. Philadelphia: JP Lippincott Co., 1993;63-82.
14. Fechtner RD, Ikram F, Essock EA. Advances in quantitative optic nerve analysis. In: Burde RM, Slamovits TL, eds. Vol. 3. Advances in clinical ophthalmology. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1996;203-224.
15. Zangwill LM, Williams JM, Weinreb RN. Quantitative methods for evaluating the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clinics N Am. 1998;11:233-241.
16. Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II Operation Manual Software, Version 1.5.0. Heidelberg: Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, 2000.
17. Zangwill LM, Berry CC, Weinreb RN. Optic disc topographic measurements after pupil dilation. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1751-1755.
18. Zangwill LM, Irak I, Berry CC, et al. Effect of cataract and pupil size on image quality with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:983-990.
19. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of mild glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
20. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect mild glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma. 1995;4:242-247.
21. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2393-2401.
22. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of mild glaucomatous structural damage with confocal laser scanning tomography. J Glaucoma 1998;7:121-127.
23. Iester M, Swindale NV, Mikelberg FS. Sector-based analysis of optic nerve head shape parameters and visual field indices in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:371-376.
24. Mistlberger A, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, et al. Heidelberg Retina Tomography and optical coherence tomography in normal, ocular-hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2027-2032.
25. Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Correlation of visual field with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1191-1194.
26. Teesalu P, Vihanninjoki K, Airaksinen PJ, et al. Correlation of Blue on Yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:2452-2459.
27. Yamagishi N, Anton A, Sample PA, et al. Mapping structural damage to the optic disc to visual field defects in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:667-676.
28. Uchida H, Yamamoto T, Tomita G, et al. Peripapillary atrophy in the primary angle closure glaucoma: A comparative study with primary open angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:121-128.
29. Rhee R, Kim YY, Nam DH, et al. Comparison of visual field defects between primary open angle glaucoma and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma in the mild or moderate stage of the disease. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2001;15:27-31.
30. Airaksinen PJ, Burk RO, Vihanninjoki K, et al. Neuroretinal rim volume with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. In: Krieglstein GK, ed. Glaucoma Update. Cologne: Kaden Verlag, 1995;Vol. V: 91-93.
31. Anderson DR. Automated Static Perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1992;152.
32. Anderson DR. Automated Static Perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1992;103-105.
33. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby & Co., 1993;63-92.
34. Thomas R, Thomas S, Chandrashekar G. Gonioscopy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1998;46:255-261.
35. Rao PS, Richard J. An introduction to biostatistics. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999;71-197.
36. Schulzer M, Drance SM, Carter CJ, et al. Biostatistical evidence for two distinct chronic open-angle glaucoma populations. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:196-200.
37. Hayreh SS, Walker WM. Fluorescent fundus photography in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;63:982-989.
38. Raitta C, Sarmela T. Fluorescein angiography of the optic disc and peripapillary area in chronic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 1970;48:303-308.
39. O'Brart DP, Lima MS, Bartsch DU, et al. Indocyanine green angiography of the peripapillary region in glaucomatous eyes by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:657-666.
40. Fantes FE, Anderson DR. Clinical histologic correlation of human peripapillary anatomy. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:20-25.
41. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. Br Med J. 1995;310:170.