Drafting behind Akamai (travelocity-based detouring)

Computer Communication Review

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 435-446

  Su, Ao Jan ^a   Kuzmanovic, Aleksandar ^a   Choffnes, David R ^a   Bustamante, Fabián E ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Akamai; CDN; DNS; Edge server; Measurement reuse; One hop source routing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; INTERNET; ROUTERS; SERVERS; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AKAMAI; CONTENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS (CDN); DNS; EDGE SERVERS; MEASUREMENT REUSE; ONE HOP SOURCE ROUTING;

WEB BROWSERS;

EID: 33750367174     PISSN: 01464833     EISSN: 01464833     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1151659.1159962     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Akamai and loral cyberstar alliance. http://www.akamai.com/en/html/about/ press/press123.html.
2. Kazaa. http://www.kazaa.com/.
3. Planetlab, http://www.planet-lab.org/.
4. Akamai. Akamai CDN. http://www.akamai.com.
5. D. Andersen, H. Balakrishnan, F. Kaashoek, and R. Morris. Resilient overlay networks. In ACM SOSP, Alberta, Canada, October 2001.
6. D. Andersen, H. Balakrishnan, F. Kaashoek, and R. Rao. Improving web availability for clients with MONET. In NSDI, Boston, MA, May 2005.
7. C. Bornstein, T. Canfield, and G. Miller. Overlay routing networks (Akarouting), 2002. http://www-math.mit.edu/steng/18.996/lecture9.ps.
8. C. Bornstein, T. Canfield, G. Miller, and S. Rao. Optimal route selection in a content delivery network. US Patent Application 20020163882.
9. J. Dilley, B. Maggs, J. Parikh, H. Prokop, and R. Sitaraman. Globally distributed content delivery. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(5):50-58, September 2002.
10. T. Fei, S. Tao, L. Gao, and R. Guerin. How to select a good alternate path in large peer-to-peer systems? In IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, April 2006.
11. S. Gadde, J. Chase, and M. Rabinovich. Web caching and content distribution: a view from the interior. In WCW, Boston, MA, June 2000.
12. P. Gilmore. OARtech, 2001. http://www.osc.edu/oarnet/oartech/presents/ oarnet/11apr2001.ppt.
13. K. Gummadi, H. Madhyastha, S. Gribble, H. Levy, and D. Wetherall. Improving the reliability of Internet paths with one-hop source routing. In USENIX OSDI, San Francisco, CA, December 2004.
14. K. Gummadi, S. Saroiu, and S. Gribble. King: Estimating latency between arbitrary Internet end hosts. In ACM IMW, Marseille, France, November 2002.
15. A. Habib and J. Chuang. A measurement-based analysis of residential multihoming. In IEEE INFOCOM, poster session, Miami, FL, March 2005.
16. K. Johnson, J. Carr, M. Day, and M. Kaashoek. The measured performance of content distribution networks. In WCW, Lisbon, Portugal. May 2000.
17. J. Jung, E. Sit, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris. DNS performance and the effectiveness of caching. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 10(5):589-603, October 2002.
18. J. Kangasharju, K. Ross, and J. Roberts. Performance evaluation of redirection schemes in content distribution networks. Computer Communications, 24(2):207-214, February 2001.
19. M. Koletsou and G. Voelker. The Medusa proxy: A tool for exploring user-perceived web performance. In WCW. Boston, MA, June 2001.
20. B. Krishnamurthy and C. Wills. Analyzing factors that influence end-to-end web performance. In WCW, Amsterdam, Netherlands, April 2000.
21. B. Krishnamurthy, C. Wills, and Y. Zhang. On the use and performance of content distribution networks. In ACM IMW, San Francisco, CA, November 2001.
22. F. Leighton and D. Lewin. Global hosting system. US Patent No. 6,108.703.
23. LimeLight Networks. Limelight networks CDN. http://www.limelightnetworks. com.
24. R. Mahajan. How Akamai works? http://www.cs.Washington.edu/homes/ratul/ akamai.html.
25. Z. Mao, C. Cranor, F. Douglis, M. Rabinovich, O. Spatscheck, and J. Wang. A precise and efficient evaluation of the proximity between web clients and their local DNS servers. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Monterrey, CA, June 2002.
26. A. Medina, M. Allman, and S. Floyd. Measuring the evolution of transport protocols in the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 35(2):37-52, April 2005.
27. Mirror Image. Mirror image CDN. http://www.mirror-image.net.
28. A. Nakao, L. Peterson, and A. Bavier. A routing underlay for overlay networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, Karlsruhe, Germany, August 2003.
29. North American Network Operators' Group. NANOG mailing list. http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist.html, 1999,2000.
30. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose. Modeling TCP Reno performance: A simple model and its empirical validation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 8(2):133-145, April 2000.
31. S. Saroiu, K. Gummadi, R. Dunn, S. Gribble, and H. Levy. An analysis of Internet content delivery systems. In USENIX OSDI, Boston, MA, December 2002.
32. S. Savage. Sting: a TCP-based measurement tool. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Boulder, CO, October 1999.
33. S. Savage, A. Collins, E. Huffman, J. Snell, and T. Anderson. The end-to-end effects of Internet path selection. In ACM SIGCOMM, Vancouver, British Columbia, September 1999.
34. SAVVIS. Digital island CDN. http://www.savvis.net.
35. A. Shaikh, R. Tewari, and M. Agrawal. On the effectiveness of DNS-based server selection. In IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, AK, April 2001.
36. C. Tang and P. K. McKinley. A distributed multipath computation framework for overlay network applications. Technical Report MSU-CSE-04-18, Michigan State University, May 2004.