Bridging the gap between receptive and productive development with minimally violable constraints

Constraints in Phonological Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 219-244

  Pater, Joe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750358299     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486418.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Allen, G. and S. Hawkins (1978). The development of phonological rhythm. In A. Bell and J. Hooper (eds.) Syllables and Segments. New York: Elsevier-North- Holland.
2. Barton, D. (1976). The Role of Perception in the Acquisition of Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. Distributed 1978, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
3. Barton, D. (1980). Phonemic perception in children. In Yeni-Komshian et al. (eds.). 97–116.
4. Beckman, J. (1998). Positional Faithfulness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
5. Benua, L. (1995). Identity effects in morphological truncation. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, Graduate Linguistic Studies Association (GLSA), University of Massachusetts.
6. Benua, L. (1997). Transderivational Identity: Phonological Relations between words. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
7. Brown, C. and J. Matthews (1997). The role of feature geometry in the development of phonemic contrasts. In S. J. Hannahs and M. Young-Scholten (eds.) Focus on Phonological Acquisition. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
8. Boersma, P. (1998). Functional Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
9. Burzio, L. (1996). Surface constraints versus underlying representation. In J. Durand and B. Laks (eds.) Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods. Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.
10. Compton, A. J. and M. Streeter (1977). Child phonology: data collection and preliminary analyses. In Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 7. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University.
11. Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In NELS 25. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
12. Donahue, M. (1986). Phonological constraints on the emergence of two-word utterances. Journal of Child Language 13. 209–218.
13. Drachman, G. (1976). Child language and language change: a conjecture and some refutations. In J. Fisiak (ed.) Recent Developments in Historical Phonology. The Hague: Mouton.
14. Dupoux, E., K. Kakehi, Y. Hirose, C. Pallier, and J. Mehler (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: a perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25. 1568–1578.
15. Echols, C. and E. Newport (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition 2. 189–220.
16. Edwards, M. L. (1974). Perception and production in child phonology: the testing of four hypotheses. Journal of Child Language 1. 205–219.
17. Eimas, P., E. Siqueland, P. Jusczyk, and J. Vigorito (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science 171. 303–306.
18. Fee, J. (1992). Exploring the minimalword in early phonological acquisition. In C. Dyck, J. Ghomeshi, and T. Wilson (eds.) Proceedings of the 1992 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association.
19. Fikkert, P. (1994) On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics, Leiden University.
20. Gerken, L. (1994). A metrical template account of children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language 21. 564–584.
21. Hale, M. and C. Reiss (1998). Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. LI 29. 656–683.
22. Hallé, P. and B. de Boysson-Bardies (1996). The format of representation of recognised words in infants’ early receptive lexicon. Infant Behavior and Development 19. 463–481.
23. Hayes, B. (this volume). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages.
24. Hoskins, S. and R. Golinkoff (2000). Novel minimal pair discrimination in 31–35- month-olds. MS., University of Delaware.
25. Ingram, D. (1974). Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language 1. 49–64.
26. Itô, J., Y. Kitagawa, and A. Mester (1996). Prosodic faithfulness and Correspondence: evidence from a Japanese Argot. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5.
27. Itô, J. and A. Mester (1999). The phonological lexicon. In N. Tsujimura (ed.) The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Jusczyk, P. (1997). The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
29. Jusczyk, P. and R. Aslin (1995). Infants’ detection of sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 29. 1–23.
30. Jusczyk, P., A. Cutler, and N. Redanz (1993). Preference for the predominant stress pattern of English words. Child Development 64. 675–687.
31. Jusczyk, P., D. Houston, and M. Newsome (1999). The beginnings ofword segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology 39. 159–207.
32. Kager, R. (1989). A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.
33. Kenstowicz, M. (1996). Base-identity and uniform exponence: alternatives to cyclicity. In J. Durand and B. Laks (eds.) Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods. Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.
34. Matthei, E. (1989). Crossing boundaries: more evidence for phonological constraints on multi-word utterances. Journal of Child Language 16. 41–54.
35. McCarthy, J. (1998). Morpheme structure constraints and paradigm occultation. Proceedings of CLS 32. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
36. McCarthy, J. (2000). The prosody of phase in Rotuman. NLLT 18. 147–197.
37. McCarthy, J. and A. Prince (1993). Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. MS., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. [Forthcoming, MIT Press]
38. McCarthy, J. and A. Prince (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. NELS 25. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
39. McCarthy, J. and A. Prince (1999). Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld (eds.) The Prosody Morphology Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 218–309.
40. Menn, L. and E. Matthei (1992). The ‘two-lexicon’ approach to child phonology: looking back, looking ahead. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, and C. Stoel-Gammon (eds.) Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, Md.:York Press.
41. Moreton, E. (1999). Evidence for phonotactic grammar in speech perception. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. San Francisco.
42. Moreton, E. (2000). Phonological Grammar in Speech Perception. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
43. Ohala, D. (1996). Cluster Reduction and Constraints in Acquisition. Ph.D dissertation, University of Arizona.
44. Paradis, J., S. Petitclerc, and F. Genesee (1996).Word truncation in early child language: perception or production? MS., McGill University.
45. Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition 6: 3. 201–253.
46. Pater, J. (2000). Nonuniformity in English stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17. 237–274.
47. Pater, J. and J. Paradis (1996). Truncation without templates in child phonology. In Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.
48. Pater, J., C. Stager, and J. Werker (1998). Additive effects of phonetic distinctions in word learning. In Proceedings: 16th International Congress on Acoustics and 135th Meeting Acoustical Society of America. 2049–2050.
49. Pater, J., C. Stager, and J. Werker (2001). The lexical acquisition of phonological contrasts. MS., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and University of British Columbia.
50. Prince, A. (1993). Minimal violation. Handout of talk presented at ROW-1, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.
51. Prince, A. and P. Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. MS., Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder. [Forthcoming, MIT Press]
52. Shvachkin, N. Kh. (1973). The development of phonemic speech perception in early childhood. In C. A. Ferguson and D. I. Slobin (eds.) Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
53. Smith, N. (1973). The Acquisition of Phonology: a Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Smolensky, P. (1996). On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. LI 27. 720–731.
55. Smolensky, P., L. Davidson, and P. Jusczyk (this volume). The initial and final states: theoretical implications and experimental explorations of Richness of the Base.
56. Stager, C. and J. Werker (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature 388. 381–382.
57. Stemberger, J. (1988). Between word processes in child phonology. Journal of Child Language 15. 39–61.
58. Steriade, D. (1995). Positional neutralization. MS., University of California, Los Angeles.
59. Strange, W. and P. A. Broen (1980). Perception and production of approximant consonants by 3-year-olds: a first study. In Yeni-Komshian et al. (eds.). 117–154.
60. Struijke, C. (1998). Reduplicant and output TETU in Kwakwala: a new model of correspondence. Papers in Phonology, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 7. 150–178.
61. Swingley, D. and R. Aslin (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition 72. 147–166.
62. Swingley, D., J. Pinto, and A. Fernald (1999). Continuous processing inword recognition at 24 months. Cognition 71. 73–108.
63. Tesar, B. and P. Smolensky (1998). The learnability of Optimality Theory. LI 29. 229–268.
64. Urbanczyk, S. (1996). Patterns of Reduplication in Lushootseed. Ph.D. dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
65. Werker, J. (1995). Age-related changes in cross-language speech perception: standing at the crossroads. In W. Strange (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistics Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium: York Press.
66. Werker, J. and C. Stager (2000). Developmental changes in infant speech perception and early word learning: is there a link? In J. Pierrehumbert and M. Broe (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Werker, J., L. Cohen, V. Lloyd, M. Casasola, and C. Stager (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month old infants. Developmental Psychology 34. 1289–1309.
68. Werker, J., K. Corcoran, C. Fennell, and C. Stager (2000). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: effects of age and vocabulary size. MS., University of British Columbia.
69. Wijnen, F., E. Krikhaar, and E. den Os (1994). The nonrealization of unstressed elements in children’s utterances: evidence for a rhythmic constraint. Journal of Child Language 21. 59–83.
70. Yeni-Komshian, G., J. Kavanagh, and C. Ferguson (eds.) (1980). Child Phonology, Vol. 2: Perception. New York: Academic Press.