Research with an impact. Evaluation practises in public research organisations

VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus

Volumn , Issue 2336, 2006, Pages 3-79

  Lähteenmäki Smith, Kaisa ^a   Hyytinen, Kirsi ^a   Kutinlahti, Pirjo ^a   Konttinen, Jari ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Evaluation; Impact assessment; Polytechnics; Public research organisations (PROs); R D; Societal impacts

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750358186     PISSN: 12350605     EISSN: 14550865     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Antila, T. & Niskanen, P. (2001). VTT:n vaikutuksia. VTT Tiedotteita 2105. [The Impact of VTT R&D Activities.] (Only in Finnish.) Espoo: VTT. http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2001/T2105.pdf.
2. Davies, H. T. O. & Nutley, S. M. (2001). Evidence-based policy and practice: moving from rhetoric to reality. Paper presented at the Third International, Interdisciplinary Evidence-Based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference, University of Durham, 4-7 July 2001.
3. Edquist, C. & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In: Edquist, C. (ed.) Systems of Innovation - Technologies, Institutions and Organization. London and Washington: Pinter Publishers.
4. Forss, K., Rebien, C. & Carlsson, J. (2002). Process use of Evaluation. Evaluation, 8(1), 29-45.
5. Geoghiou, L. (1998). Issues in the Evaluation of Innovation and Technology Policy. Evaluation, 4(1), 37-51.
6. Gustafsson, R. & Autio, E. (2006). Grounding for Innovation Policy: The Market, System and Social-Cognitive Failure Rationales. Paper presented at Innovation Pressure-conference, 15-17 March 2006, Tampere, Finland.
7. Hyytinen, K. & Konttinen, J. (2006). Vaikuttavaa tutkimusta. Arviointikäytäntöjäjulkisissa tutkimusorganisaatioissa: Puolustusvoimien Teknillinen Tutkimuslaitos. VTT Tiedotteita 2333. Espoo: VTT. [Research with impact. Evaluation practices in public research organisations: Finnish Defence Forces Technical Research Centre PVTT.] (Only in Finnish.) http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2006/T2333.pdf.
8. Koch, P. et al. (2003). Rationalities and innovation policy learning, GoodNip (Good practices in Nordic Innovation Policies). Report, Part 2 Innovation Policy trends and Rationalities. Oslo: NIFU STEP.
9. Kuhlmann, S. (2003). Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(2/3/4), 131-149.
10. Kuitunen, S. & Hyytinen, K. (2004). Julkisten tutkimuslaitosten vaikutusten arviointi. Käytäntöjä, kokemuksia ja haasteita. VTT Tiedotteita 2230. Espoo: VTT. [Impact evaluation of public research organisations. Practices, experiences and challenges.] (Only in Finnish.) http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2004/T2230.pdf.
11. Kutinlahti, P. & Hyytinen, K. (2002). VTT:n yhteiskunnalliset vaikutukset. VTT Tiedotteita 2176. [Societal impacts of VTT.] (Only in Finnish.) Espoo: VTT. http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2002/T2176.pdf.
12. Kutinlahti, P., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K. & Konttinen, J. (2006). Vaikuttavaa tutkimusta. Arviointikäytäntöjä julkisissa tutkimusorganisaatioissa: Helia ja SAMK. VTT Tiedotteita 2332. Espoo: VTT. http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2006/T2332.pdf.
13. Leviton, L. & Hughes, E. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations. A review and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5(4), 525-548.
14. Loikkanen, T. & Kutinlahti, P. (2005). Towards Systemic Future-oriented Innovation Policy Studies - Perspectives of Finnish Knowledge Based Economy. Paper presented at the Innovation Systems in the Knowledge-based Society Conference, LABEIN Tecnalia, Bilbao, 22-23 September 2005.
15. Lähteenmäki-Smith, K. & Hyytinen, K. (2006). Vaikuttavaa tutkimusta. Arviointikäytäntöjä julkisissa tutkimusorganisaatioissa: Maa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus MTT. VTT Tiedotteita 2334. [Research with impact. Evaluation practices in public research organisations: Agrifood Research Finland MTT.] (Only in Finnish.) Espoo: VTT. http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2006/T2234.pdf.
16. Malerba, F. (2004). The Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Mickwitz, P. (2002). Effectiveness Evaluation of Environmental Policy - the role of intervention theories. Administrative Studies, 4(21), 77-87.
18. Nagarajan, N. & Vanheukelen, M. (1997). Evaluating EU Expenditure Programmes: A Guide to intermediate and ex post evaluation. XIX/02 - Budgetary overview and evaluation. DG XIX, European Commission.
19. OECD (2001). Innovative clusters. Drivers of national innovation systems. Paris: OECD.
20. Oksanen, J. (2000). Research Evaluation in Finland. Practices and experiences, past and present. Working papers no. 51/00. Printing office Lars Eriksen Oy. Espoo.
21. Oksanen, J. (2003). VTT:n alueellinen rooli ja vaikuttavuus. VTT Tiedotteita 2205. [Regional role and impact of VTT.] (Only in Finnish.) Espoo: VTT. http://virtual.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2003/T2205.pdf.
22. Patton, M. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. London: Sage.
23. Pöysti, T. et al. (2003). Towards Better Accountability. Helsinki: Ministry of Finance.
24. Salminen, M. (ed.) (2005). Tulosohjauksen käsikirja. [The Manual of Performance Guidance.] Helsinki: Ministry of Finance. Electronic version available (in Finnish) at: http://www.vm.fi/tiedostot/pdf/fi/96500.pdf.
25. Smith, R. & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1/2), 4-32.
26. Tassey, G. (2003). Methods for Assessing the Economic Impacts of Government R&D. Planning Report 03-1. National institute of Standards & Technology, NIST.
27. Tiihonen, S. (2004). From Governing to Governance. A Process of Change. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
28. Venetoklis, T. (2002). Public Policy Evaluation. Introduction to Quantitative Methods. Tutkimusraportteja 20. Helsinki: VATT.
29. Wimbush, E. & Watson, J. (2002). An Evaluation Framework for Health Promotion: Theory, Quality and Effectiveness. Evaluation, 6(3), 301-322.