Somaclonal variation in micropropagated tulips determined by phenotype and DNA markers

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 714, Issue , 2006, Pages 211-219

  Podwyszynska M ^a   Niedoba, K ^a   Korbin, M ^a   Marasek, A ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POMOLOGY AND FLORICULTURE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Genetic stability; In vitro culture; ISSR; RAPD; Tulipa

Indexed keywords

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PSITTACIDAE; TULIPA;

EID: 33750357166     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2006.714.23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Addinsoft. 2006. XLSTAT 2006, Data analysis and statistics with Microsoft Excel, Paris, France.
2. Al-Zahim, M.A., Ford-Lloyd, B.V. and Newbury H.J. 1999. Detection of somaclonal variation in garlic (Allium sativum L.) using RAPD and cytological analysis. Plant Cell Rep. 18:473-477.
3. Aravanopoulos, F.A. 2003. Molecular identification of micropropagated plants. Acta Hort. 616:25-47.
4. Bouman, H. and De Klerk, G.-J. 2001. Measurement of the extent of somaclonal variation in begonia plants regenerated under various conditions. Comparison of three assays. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:111-117.
5. Devarumath, R.M., Nandy, S., Rani, V., Marimuthu, S., Muraleedharan, N. and Raina, S.N. 2002. RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic integrity of micropropagated plants of three diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camelia sinensis (China type) and C. assamica ssp. assamica (Assam-India type). Plant Cell Rep. 21:166-173.
6. Dice, L.R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297-302.
7. Doyle, J.F. and Doyle, J.L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13-15.
8. Gostimsky, S.A., Kokaeva, Z.G. and Konovalov, F.A. 2005. Studying plant genome variation using molecular markers. Russ. J. Genet. 41:378-388.
9. Chen, W.H., Chen, T.M., Fu, Y.M., Hsieh, R.M. and Chen, W.S. 1998. Studies on somaclonal variation in Phalenopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 18:7-13
10. Jain, S.M. and De Klerk, G.-J. 1998. Somaclonal variation in breeding and propagation of ornamental crops. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotech. 4:63-75.
11. Karp, A. 1995. Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improvement. Euphytica 85:295-302.
12. Langens, M.M. 2001. Progress in tissue culture techniques for propagation of tulips. FlowerTECH 4:22-24.
13. Larkin, P.J. and Scowcroft, W.R. 1981. Somaclonal variation - novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60:197-214.
14. Le Nard, M., Ducommun, C., Weber, G., Dorion, N. and Bigot, C. 1987. Observations sur la multiplication in vitro de la tulipe (Tulipa gesneriana L.) à partir de hampes florales prélevées chez des bulbes en cours de conservation. Agronomie 7:321-329.
15. Martin, C., Uberhuaga, E. and Perez, C. 2002. Application of RAPD markers in the characterization of Chrysanthemum varieties and the assessment of somaclonal variation. Euphytica 127:247-253.
16. Nishiuchi, Y. 1980. Studies on vegetative propagation of tulip. 4. Regeneration of bulblets in bulb scale segments cultured in vitro. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 49:235-239.
17. Palombi, M.A. and Damiano, C. 2002. Comparison between RAPD and SSR molecular markers in detecting genetic variation in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev). Plant Cell Rep. 20:1061-1066.
18. Pla̧der, W., Malepszy, S., Burza, W. and Rusinowski, Z. 1998. The relationship between the regeneration system and variability in the cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 103:9-15.
19. Podwyszyńska, M. 2001. Effect of carbohydrates on shoot multiplication and bulb formation of tulip in vitro. Roczn. AR Poznań, Ogrodnictwo 33:119-126.
20. Podwyszyńska, M. 2005. Somaclonal variation in micropropagated tulips based on phenotype observation. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 13:109-122.
21. Podwyszyńska, M. and Marasek, A. 2003. Effect of thidiazuron and paclobutrazol on regeneration potential of tulip flower stalk explants in vitro and subsequent shoot multiplication. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 72:181-190.
22. Renau-Morata, B., Nebauer, S.G., Arrillaga, I. and Segura, J. 2005. Assessments of somaclonal variation in micropropagated shoots of Cedrus: consequences of axillary bud breaking. Tree Genetic and Genomes 1:3-10.
23. Saker, M.M., Adawy, S.S., Mohamed, A.A. and El-Itriby, H.A. 2006. monitoring of cultivar identify in tissue culture-derived date palms using RAPD and AFLP analysis. Biol. Plant. 50:198-204.
24. Taeb, A.G. and Alderson, P.G. 1990. Shoot production and bulbing of tulip in vitro related to ethylene. J. Hort. Sci. 65:199-204.
25. Van Scheepen, J. 1996. Classified list and international register of tulip names. Royal Bulb Growers' Association KAVB, Hillegom, The Netherlands. p.91 and 417.