Split applications of herbicides at reduced rates can effectively control wild oat (Avena fatua) in wheat

Weed Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 369-374

  Lockhart, Sam J ^b   Howatt, Kirk A ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Hard red spring wheat; Reduced herbicide rates

Indexed keywords

AVENA FATUA; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 33750352276     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-100R1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Barton, D. L., D. C. Thill, and B. Shafii. 1992. Integrated wild oat (Avena fatua) management affects spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) yield and economics. Weed Technol. 6:129-135.
2. Holm, F. A., K. J. Kirkland, and F. C. Stevenson. 2000. Defining optimum herbicide rates and timing for wild oat control (Avena fatua) in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 14:167-175.
3. Holm, L. G., J. P. Herberger, J. V. Pancho, and D. L. Plucknett. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.
4. Kirkland, K. J. 1993. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) competition. Weed Technol. 7:890-893.
5. Kirkland, K. J., E. N. Johnson, and F. C. Stevenson. 2001. Control of wild oat (Avena fatua) in wheat with MKH 6562. Weed Technol. 15:48-55.
6. Medd, R. W. 1994. Methodology for estimation of wild oat seed production and the seed bank. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 34:637-639.
7. Nalewaja, J. D. 1977. Wild oats: global doom. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 30:21-32.
8. North Dakota Agricultural Statistics. 2001. No. 70. United States Department of Agricultural-North Dakota Agricultural Statistics Service. Fargo, ND: USDA-North Dakota Agricultural Statistics Service. Pp. 111-114.
9. O'Donovan, J. T., E. A. de St. Remy, P. A. O'Sullivan, D. A. Dew, and A. K. Sharma. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498-503.
10. Ramsdale, B. K. and C. G. Messersmith. 2002. Low-rate split-applied herbicide treatments for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in wheat (Triticm aestivum). Weed Technol. 16:149-155.
11. Spandl, E., B. R. Durgan, and D. W. Miller. 1997. Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vul- gare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:591-597.
12. Stevenson, F. C., F. A. Holm, and K. J. Kirkland. 2000. Optimizing wild oat (Avena fatua) with ICIA 0604. Weed Technol. 14:608-616.
13. Stougaard, R. N., J. D. Harris, and B. D. Maxwell. 1997. Influence of application timing on the efficacy of reduced rate postemergence herbicides for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Technol. 11:283-289.
14. Wille, M. J., D. C. Thill, and W. J. Price. 1998. Wild oat (Avena fatua) seed production in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) is affected by the interaction of wild oat density and herbicide rate. Weed Sci. 46:336-343.