Attention and salience in associative blocking

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 285-304

  Denton, Stephen E ^a   Kruschke, John K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 33750347698     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192884     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ARCEDIANO, F., ESCOBAR, M., & MILLER, R. R. (2004). Is stimulus competition an acquisition deficit or a performance deficit? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1105-1110.
2. EDGELL, S. E., CASTELLAN, N. J., JR., ROE, R. M., BARNES, J. M., NG, P. C., BRIGHT, R. D., ET AL. (1996). Irrelevant information in probabilistic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1463-1481.
3. FELDMAN, J. M. (1975). Blocking as a function of added cue intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 3, 98-102.
4. GHIRLANDA, S. (2005). Retrospective revaluation as simple associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 107-111.
5. HALL, G., MACKINTOSH, N. J., GOODALL, G., & DAL MARTELLO, M. (1977). Loss of control by a less valid or by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement. Learning & Motivation, 8, 145-158.
6. HINTON, G. E. (1989). Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 185-234.
7. KAMIN, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9-33). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
8. KAMIN, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. KLEIN, S. B., WESTON, D., MCGEE-DAVIS, T., & COHEN, L. (1984). The relative contributions of predictiveness and salience in flavor aversion learning. Learning & Motivation, 15, 188-202.
10. KROGH, A., & HERTZ, J. A. (1992). A simple weight decay can improve generalization. In J. E. Moody, S. J. Hanson, & R. P. Lippmann (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 4, pp. 950-957). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
12. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (2001a). The inverse base-rate effect is not explained by eliminative inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1385-1400.
13. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (2001b). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812-863.
14. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (2005). Learning involves attention. In G. Houghton (Ed.), Connectionist models in cognitive psychology (pp. 113-140). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
15. KRUSCHKE, J. K., & BLAIR, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 636-645.
16. KRUSCHKE, J. K., & JOHANSEN, M. K. (1999). A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1083-1119.
17. KRUSCHKE, J. K., KAPPENMAN, E. S., & HETRICK, W. P. (2005). Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 830-845.
18. LE PELLEY, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193-243.
19. LUCE, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
20. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
21. MARKMAN, A. B. (1989). LMS rules and the inverse base-rate effect: Comment on Gluck and Bower (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 417-421.
22. MCLAREN, I. P. L., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246.
23. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24. TRABASSO, T., & BOWER, G. H. (1968). Attention in learning: Theory and research. New York: Wiley.
25. VAN HAMME, L. J., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning & Motivation, 25, 127-151.
26. WAGNER, A. R., LOGAN, F. A., HABERLANDT, K., & PRICE, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180.
27. WASSERMAN, E. A., & BERGLAN, L. R. (1998). Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: The role of within-compound associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 121-138.