Adaptation to distorted frequency-to-place maps: Implications of simulations in normal listeners for cochlear implants and electroacoustic stimulation

Audiology and Neurotology

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages 21-26

  Faulkner, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electroacoustic stimulation; Frequency mapping; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; HUMANS; PATIENT SIMULATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33750341149     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: 14219700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000095610     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Dorman MF, Loizou PC, Rainey D: Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:2993-2996.
2. Faulkner A, Rosen S, Norman C: The right information may matter more than frequency-place alignment: simulations of frequency-aligned and upward shifting cochlear implant processors for a shallow electrode array insertion. Ear Hear 2006;27:139-152.
3. Faulkner A, Rosen S, Saul L: Perceptual adaptation to a binaurally-mismatched frequency-to-place map: what is learned? Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, August 2005.
4. Faulkner A, Rosen S, Stanton D: Simulations of tonotopically-mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;13:1073-1080.
5. French NR, Steinberg JC: Factors governing the intelligibility of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1947;19:90-119.
6. Fu QJ, Galvin JJ: The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:1065-1072.
7. Fu QJ, Shannon RV: Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1999;20:332-344.
8. Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Galvin JJ: Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112:1664-1674.
9. Gantz BJ, Turner C: Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:344-347.
10. Greenwood DD: A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-2605.
11. Ketten DR, Vannier MW, Skinner MW, Gates GA, Wang G, Neely JG: In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of Nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;175:1-16.
12. Offeciers E, Morera C, Muller J, Huarte A, Shallop J, Cavalle L: International consensus on bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation - Second Meeting Consensus on Auditory Implants, 19-21 February 2004, Valencia, Spain. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:918-919.
13. Rosen S, Faulkner A, Wilkinson L: Perceptual adaptation by normal listeners to upward shifts of spectral information in speech and its relevance for users of cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;106:3629-3636.
14. Shannon RV, Galvin JJ, Baskent D: Holes in hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002;3:185-199.
15. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, Gates GA, Neely JG, Kletzker GR, Brunsden B, Blocker B: CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002;3:332-350.
16. Smith M, Faulkner A: Perceptual adaptation by normally hearing listeners to a simulated 'hole' in hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, in press.
17. Sridhar D, Stakhovskaya O, Leake PA: A frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglion. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11(suppl 1):16-20.