High Accuracy Retrieval with Multiple Nested Ranker

Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 437-444

  Matveeva, Irina ^a   Burges, Chris ^b   Burkard, Timo ^c   Laucius, Andy ^c   Wong, Leon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^c MSN Search   (United States)

Author keywords

Ad hoc retrieval; High accuracy retrieval; Re ranking

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PRECISION ENGINEERING;

AD HOC RETRIEVAL; HIGH ACCURACY RETRIEVAL; ITERATION; RERANKING; AD-HOC RETRIEVAL; RE-RANKING;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750340101     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1148170.1148246     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. E. B. Baum and F. Wilczek. Supervised learning of probability distributions by neural networks. Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 52-61, 1987.
2. C. J. Surges, T. Shaked, E. Renshaw, A. Lazier, M. Deeds, N. Hamilton, and G. Hullender. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Proceedings of ICML, 2005.
3. Y. Freund. Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority. Information and Computation, pages 121(2):256-285, 1995.
4. Y. Freund, R. Iyer, and R. Shapire. An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. In Journal of Machine Learning Research, volume 4, pages 933-969, 2003.
5. D. He and D. Demner-Fushman. HARD experiment at Maryland: From need negotiation to automated HARD process. In Proceedings of TREC, 2003.
6. A. James. HARD track overview in TREC 2003. In Proceedings of TREC, 2003.
7. A. James. HARD track overview in TREC 2004. In Proceedings of TREC, 2004.
8. B. J. Jansen and A. Spink. An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet Computing, pages 65-69, 2003.
9. B. J. Jansen, A. Spink, J. Bateman, and T. Saracevic. Real life information retrieval: A study of user queries on the web. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 5-17, 1998.
10. K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 41-48, 2000.
11. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceeding of SIGIR, pages 154-161, 2005.
12. Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, G. B. Orr, and K.-R. Mueller. Efficient backprop. In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, pages 9-50. Springer, 1998.
13. W. Lin, A. Hauptmann, and R. Jin. Web image retrieval reranking with a relevance model. In Proceedings IEEE/WIG, 2003.
14. J. Ponte. Language models for relevance feedback. In W. Croft, editor, Advances in Information Retrieval. pages 73-96, 2000.
15. J. J. Roccio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313-323. Prentice Hall, 1971.
16. C. Shah and W. B. Croft. Evaluating high accuracy retrieval techniques. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 2-9, 2004.
17. L. Shen and A. K. Joshi. Ranking and reranking with perceptron. Machine Learning, 60(1-3):73-96, 2005.
18. E. M. Voorhees. Evaluation by highly relevant documents. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 74-82, 2001.
19. Y. Xiao, R. Luk, K. Wong, and K. Kwok. Some experiments with blind feedback and re-ranking for Chinese information retrieval. In Proceedings NTCIR, 2005.