Symptomatic imperfections

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 395-422

  Ash, Asudeh ^a   Ida, Toivonen ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750335650     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226706003963     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Asudeh, A. (2004). Resumption as resource management. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford University.
2. Baker, M. C. (1988). Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Bender, E. M. (2002). Review of Roger Martin, David Michaels&Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Journal of Linguistics 38. 432-439.
4. Berman, J. (2003). Clausal syntax of German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
5. Bouma, G., Malouf, R. & Sag, I. A. (2001). Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19. 1-65.
6. Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
8. Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In Anderson, S. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 233-285.
9. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
10. Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Freidin, R. (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 417-454. [Reprinted as chapter 2 of Chomsky 1995.]
11. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D. & Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by step: essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89-155.
13. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: a life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1-50.
14. Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 104-131.
15. Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 1-22.
16. Collins, C. (1997). Local economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Cornell, T. L. (2004). Lambek calculus for transformational grammar. Research on Language and Computation 2. 105-126.
18. Dalrymple, M. (2001). Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Falk, Y. N. (2001). Lexical-Functional Grammar: an introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
20. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. K. & Sag, I. A. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Hornstein, N. (2000). Move! A Minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Johnson, D. E. & Lappin, S. (1997). A critique of the Minimalist Program. Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 273-333.
23. Johnson, D. E. & Lappin, S. (1999). Local constraints vs. economy. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
24. Kalectaca, M. (1978). Lessons in Hopi (edited by R. W. Langacker) Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
25. Kaplan, R. M. & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-Functional Grammar: a formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan, J. (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 173-281.
26. Kayne, R. S. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
27. Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. & Johnson, D. E. (2000a). Topic…comment: the structure of unscientific revolutions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18. 665-671.
28. Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. & Johnson, D. E. (2000b). The revolution confused: a response to our critics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18. 873-890.
29. Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. & Johnson, D. E. (2001). The revolution maximally confused. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19. 901-919.
30. Lecomte, A. (2004). RebuildingMP on a logical ground. Research on Language and Computation 2. 27-55.
31. McCloskey, J. (2002). Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In Epstein, S. D. & Seeley, T. D. (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell. 184-226.
32. Napoli, D. J. (1993). Syntax: theory and problems. New York: Oxford University Press. Newmeyer, F. J. (in press). Possible and probable languages : a generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1987). Information-based syntax and semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
34. Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL & Stanford, CA: The University of Chicago Press & CSLI Publications.
35. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365-424.
36. Pullum, G. K. (1997). The morpholexical nature of English to-contraction. Language 73. 79-102.
37. Pullum, G. K. & Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 19. 9-50.
38. Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Retoré, C. & Stabler, E. (2004). Generative grammars and resource logics. Research on Language and Computation 2. 3-25.
40. Sag, I. A., Wasow, T. & Bender, E. M. (2003). Syntactic theory: a formal introduction (2nd edn.). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
41. Scholz, B. C. & Pullum, G. K. (2002). Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism. The Linguistic Review 19. 185-224.
42. Sells, P. (1984). Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
43. Shieber, S. M. (1986). An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
44. Stabler, E. (1998). Acquiring languages with movement. Syntax 1. 72-97. Steedman, M. (1996). Surface structure and interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Vermaat, W. (2004). The Minimalist MOVE operation in a deductive perspective. Research on Language and Computation 2. 69-85.
46. Zaenen, A. (1983). On syntactic binding. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 469-504.