Analysis of karyometric variables in spontaneously occurring canine mammary tumors

Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 292-296

  Nair, Binoj C ^a,b   Kumar, Sai ^a,b   Rani, Sudha ^a,c   Paliwal, Om Prakash ^a,b  

^a INDIAN VETERINARY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b Pathology Division   (India)

^c Bacteriology Division   (Japan)

Author keywords

Canine mammary tumors; Image analysis; Morphometry

Indexed keywords

EOSIN; FORMALDEHYDE; HEMATOXYLIN; PARAFFIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BREAST ADENOCARCINOMA; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CELL NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOG; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KARYOMETRY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PERIMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; STAINING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALS; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; FEMALE; KARYOMETRY; MAMMARY NEOPLASMS, ANIMAL;

EID: 33750328439     PISSN: 08846812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kronqvist P, Kuopio T, Collan Y: Morphometric grading of invasive ductal breast cancer: Thresholds for nuclear grade. Br J Cancer 1998;78:800-805
2. Pienta KJ, Coffey DS: Correlation of nuclear morphometry with progression of breast cancer. Cancer 1991;68:2012-2016
3. Moulton JE: Tumors in Domestic Animals. Second edition. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990
4. Rungsipipat A, Suryasootcharee B, Ousawaphlangchai L, Sailasuta A, Thanawongnuwech R, Teankum K, Rungsipipat A, Boonmee S, Lek O, Sailasuta A, Roongroje T, Teankum K: Neoplasms of dogs in Bangkok. Thai J Vet Med 2003;33:59-66
5. Maiolino P, Cataldi M, Paciello O, Restucci B, De Vico G: Nucleomorphometric analysis of canine cutaneous mast cell tumors. J Comp Pathol 2005;133:209-211
6. Strefezzi R de F, Xavier JG, Catao-Dias JL: Morphometry of canine cutaneous mast cell tumors. Vet Pathol 2003;40:268-275
7. Maiolino P, Restucci B, Papparella S, De-Vico G: Nuclear morphometry in squamous cell carcinomas of canine skin. J Comp Pathol 2002;127:114-117
8. Ciurea D, Wilkins RJ, Shalev M, Liu Z, Barba J, Gil J: Use of computerized interactive morphometry in the diagnosis of mammary adenoma and adenocarcinoma in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:300-303
9. Simeonov R, Simeonova G: Computerized morphometry of mean nuclear diameter and nuclear roundness in canine mammary gland tumors on cytologic smears. Vet Clin Pathol 2006;35:88-90
10. Nerurkar VR, Chitale AR, Jalnapurkar BV, Naik SN, Lalitha VS: Comparative pathology of canine mammary tumors. J Comp Pathol 1989;101:389-397
11. Hampe JF, Misdorp W: Tumors and dysplasias of the mammary gland. Bull World Health Organ 1974;50:111-134
12. Lohr CV, Teifke JP, Failing K, Weiss E: Characterization of the proliferation state in canine mammary tumors by the standardized AgNOR method with post fixation and immunohistologic detection of Ki-67 and PCNA. Vet Pathol 1997;34:212-221
13. Destexhe E, Bicker E, Coignoul F: Image analysis evaluation of ploidy, S-phase fraction and nuclear area in canine mammary tumors. J Comp Pathol 1995;113:205-216
14. Baak JP, Van Dop H, Kurver PH, Hermans JO: The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer. Cancer 1985;56:374-382
15. Nafe R, Franz K, Schlote W, Schneider B: Morphology of tumor cell nuclei is significantly related with survival time of patients with glioblastomas. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2141-2148
16. Marchevsky AM, Erler BS: Morphometry in pathology. In Image Analysis: A Primer for Pathologists. Edited by AM Marchevsky, PH Bartels. New York, Raven Press, 1994, pp 125-179
17. Funakoshi Y, Nakayama H, Uetsuka K, Nishimura R, Sasaki N, Doi K: Cellular proliferative and telomerase activity in canine mammary gland tumors. Vet Pathol 2000;37:177-183
18. de Vico G, Sfacteria A, Maiolino P, Mazzullo G: Comparison of nuclear morphometric parameters in cytologic smears and histologic sections of spontaneous canine tumors. Vet Clin Pathol 2002;31:16-18