Nordic compensation schemes for drug injuries

Journal of Consumer Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 143-175

  Hodges, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Compensation schemes; Denmark; Finland; Nordic; Norway; Product liability; Sweden

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750326148     PISSN: 01687034     EISSN: 15730700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-006-9003-4     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Baldwin, P. (1990). The politics of social solidarity: The foundation of European welfare states 1875-1975. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Calderini, M., Cantamessa, M., & Palamigiano, A. (2004). Analysis of the economic impact of the development risk clause as provided by Directive 85/374/EEC on liability for defective products. Rome, Italy: Fondazione Roselli.
3. Danzon, P. M. (1994). The Swedish patient compensation system: Lessons for the United States. The Journal of Legal Medicine, 15, 199-247.
4. Dufwa, B. W. (1980). Product liability legislation. General problems and techniques. The Swedish experience. In Tidskrift, utgiven av Juridiska Föreningen I (Finland), pp. 1-11.
5. Donaldson, L. (2003). Making amends: A consultation paper setting out proposals for reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS: A report by the Chief Medical Officer (UK Department of Health). London: Department of Health.
6. Dute, J., Faure, M. G., & Koziol, H. (Eds.) (2004). Tort and insurance law, Vol. 8: No-fault compensation in the health care sector. New York: Springer.
7. Lodrup, P. (2002). Norwegian report. AIDA XIth World Congress, New York, 22-25 October 2002, (pp. 117-150). Dansk Selskab for Forsikringsret [Danish Section of the International Association of Insurance Law].
8. McIntosh, D., & Holmes, M. (2003). Personal injury awards in EU and EFTA countries (2nd ed.). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
9. Oldertz, C. (1986). Security insurance, patient insurance and pharmaceutical insurance in Sweden. American Journal of Comparative Law, 34, 635-656.
10. Oliphant, K. (2004). Beyond Woodhouse: Devising new principles for determining ACC boundary issues. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 35 (4), Special Issue on Accident Compensation, 915-936.
11. Skegg, P. D. G. (2003). Compensation in the New Zealand health care sector. In J. Dute, M. G. Faure, & H. Koziol (Eds.) (2004), Tort and insurance law, Vol. 8: No-fault compensation in the health care sector (pp. 298-332). New York: Springer.
12. Von Eyben, B. (Ed.) (2002). Alternative compensation mechanisms for damages. The Nordic countries: Common report and national reports. AIDA XIth World Congress, New York, 22-25 October 2002 (pp. 117-150). Dansk Selskab for Forsikringsret [Danish Section of the International Association of Insurance Law].