Reply to an analytic philosopher

South Atlantic Quarterly

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 228-242

  Smith, Barbara Herrnstein ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750325876     PISSN: 00382876     EISSN: 15278026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/00382876-101-1-229     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. For the latter, see, e.g., Andrew Pickering, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)
2. Bruno Latour, Aramis or the Love of Technology, trans. Catherine Porter (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996)
3. J. J.Gibson, The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966)
4. Nelson Goodman, Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1978)
5. Humberto R. Maturana and Francisco J. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Boston: D. Reidel, 1980)
6. Gerald Edelman, The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness (New York: Basic Books, 1989)
7. Antonio R. Damasio, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (New York: Avon, 1994)
8. Edwin Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996)
9. Rodney A. Brooks, "Intelligence without Representation," Artificial Intelligence 47 (1991): 139-59
10. The Strong Programme has been superseded in important respects by later developments in the social study of scientific practices. For a discussion, see Andrew Pickering, "From Science As Knowledge to Science As Practice," in Science As Practice and Culture, ed. Pickering (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 1-28
11. The sociology of science was initiated as a field of study in the 1940s by Robert K. Merton (see the editor's introduction to Merton, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. Norman W. Storer [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973], xi-xxxi)
12. For a good account of the later developments and differences, see Steven Shapin, "Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge," Annual Review of Sociology 21 (1995): 289-321
13. For an extended discussion of the logic in question, see my Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998), 88-124
14. Lorraine Code, "Taking Subjectivity into Account," in Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter (New York: Routledge, 1993), 40
15. Plato, Theaetetus (170a-172c, 177c-179b)
16. I consider the passage and analyze its subsequent invocations and rehearsals in "Unloading the Self-Refutation Charge," Common Knowledge 2.2 (1993): 81-95
17. reprinted in Smith, Belief and Resistance, 73-87