Nonwithdrawal molting programs

Journal of Applied Poultry Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 483-491

  Koelkebeck, K W ^a   Parsons, C M ^a   Biggs, P ^a   Utterback, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Induced molting; Laying hen; Nonwithdrawal molt diet; Soybean hulls; Wheat middlings

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; GLYCINE MAX; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33750323403     PISSN: 10566171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/japr/15.3.483     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Brake, J. T., and J. B. Carey. 1983. Induced molting of commercial layers. North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service Poultry Science and Technical Guide No. 10. North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, Raleigh, NC.
2. Ruszler, P. L. 1996. The keys to successful force molting. Publication 408-026 (revised). Virginia Cooperative Extension Service. Blacksburg, VA.
3. Park, S. Y., S. G. Birkhold, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke. 2004. Effects of high zinc diets using zinc propionate on molt induction, organs, and postmolt egg production and quality in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 83:24-33.
4. Davis, A. J., M. M. Lordelo, and N. Dale. 2002. Use of cottonseed meats in molting programs. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:175-178.
5. Keshavarz, K., and F. W. Quimby. 2002. An investigation on different molting techniques with an emphasis on animal welfare. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:54-67.
6. Scheideler, S. E., M. M. Beck, and L. LaBrash. 2003. Non-feed withdrawal programs for laying hen molt. Pages 50-53 in Proc. 2003 Midwest Poultry Federation Convention.
7. Anderson, K. E. 2003. The heterophil:lymphocyte ratio and behavioral response of present day SCWL laying hens during the first cycle and molt. Final Report to United Egg Producers. Personal communication.
8. Bell, D. D., and D. R. Kuney. 2004. Farm evaluation of alternative molting procedures. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 13:673-679.
9. Hooge, D. M., R. F. Wideman, and W. J. Kuenzel. 2005. License granted for new molting technology. Feedstuffs January 24:6.
10. Funding for our research reported herein has come from the United Egg Producers, California Egg Commission, Ridley Feed Ingredients, Purina Mills, and the Midwest Poultry Consortium.
11. Biggs, P. E., M. W. Douglas, K. W. Koelkebeck, and C. M. Parsons. 2003. Evaluation of nonfeed removal methods for molting programs. Poult. Sci. 82:749-753.
12. Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY.
13. Urner Barry's Price Current. 2000. Midwest egg price quote, www.urnerbarry.com
14. Biggs, P. E., M. E. Persia, K. W. Koelkebeck, and C. M. Parsons. 2004. Further evaluation of nonfeed removal methods for molting programs. Poult. Sci. 83:745-752.
15. Urner Barry's Price Current. 2001. Midwest egg price quote. www.urnerbarry.com
16. Bell, D.D. 2004. United Egg Producers molt method survey. Personal Communication.
17. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.