Single- versus multidetector-row CT: Comparison of sedation rates, conventional angiograms and motion artefacts in young children following liver transplantation;TC a singolo detettore versus TC a detettore multiplo: Confronto fra sedazione, angiografie convenzionali ed artefatti da movimento, nei pazienti pediatrici dopo trapianto epatico

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 111, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 911-920

  Lemos, A A ^a,c   Siegel, M J ^b   Rossi, G ^a   Somalvico, F ^a   Cioffi, U ^a   Biondetti, P R ^a  

^a FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hepatic transplantation; Motion artefacts; Multidetector CT

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SEDATION;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTIFACTS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHLORAL HYDRATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MOTION; PENTOBARBITAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33750322442     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-006-0090-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Frush DP, Siegel MJ, Bisset GS (1997) From the RSNA refresher courses: challenges of pediatric spiral CT. Radiographics 17:939-959
2. Siegel MJ (1999) Techniques In: Siegel MJ (ed) Pediatric body CT. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1-41
3. Donnelly LF, Frush DP, Nelson RC (2000) Multislice helical CT to facilitate combined CT of the neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1620-1622
4. Bhalla S, Siegel MJ (2002) Multislice computed tomography in pediatrics In: Silverman PM (ed) Multislice computed tomography: a practical approach to clinical protocols. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 231-282
5. Siegel MJ (2003) Multiplanar and three-dimensional multi-detector row CT of thoracic vessels and airways in the pediatric population. Radiology 229:641-650
6. Kaste SC, Young CW, Holmes TP et al (1997) Effect of helical CT on the frequency of sedation in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1001-1003
7. Pappas JN, Donnelly LF, Frush DP (2000) Reduced frequency of sedation in young children with multisection helical CT. Radiology 215:897-899
8. Sacchetti A, Carraccio C, Giardino G et al (2005) Sedation for pediatric CT scanning: is radiology becoming a drug-free zone? Pediatr Emerg Care 21:295-297
9. Rogers LF (2001) Taking care of children: check out the parameters used for helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 30:300-306
10. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs (1992) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 89:1110-1115
11. Task force on sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists (1996) Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists: a report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists. Anaesthesiology 84:459-471
12. Landis GR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of interobserver agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174
13. Cetta F, Grahan LC, Eidem BW (2000) Gaining vascular access in pediatric patients. Use of the PD access Doppler needle. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 51:61-64
14. Franken EA Jr, Sequeira GD, Smith WL et al (1982) Femoral artery spasm in children: catheter size is the principal cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 138:295-298
15. Lawler LP, Fishman EK (2001) Multidetector row CT of thoracic disease with emphasis on 3D volume rendering and CT angiography. Radiographics 21:1257-1273
16. Ravenel JG, Mc Adams HP, Remy-Jardin M et al (2001) Multidimensional imaging of the thorax: practical applications. J Thorac Imaging 16:279-281
17. Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5-6
18. Suleiman OH (2004) Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol 34:S242-S246
19. Frush DP (2002) Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminishing the radiation. Pediatr Radiol 32:714-717
20. Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D et al (2004) Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology 233:515-522