Determinants of range effects in face recognition

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 229-240

  Verbeek, Eric L ^a   Spetch, Marcia L ^a   Cheng, Ken ^b   Clifford, Colin W G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRIGHTNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RECOGNITION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 33750318638     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192878     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. APPELLE, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The "oblique effect" in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266-278.
2. BARON, A. (1973). Postdiscrimination gradients of human subjects on a tone continuum. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 337-342.
3. COLLISHAW, S. M., & HOLE, G. J. (2002). Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces? Perception, 31, 287-296.
4. GHIRLANDA, S., & ENQUIST, M. (2003). One century of generalization. Animal Behaviour, 66, 15-36.
5. HANSON, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 321-334.
6. HAYS, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7. HELSON, H. (1947). Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 1-29.
8. LEOPOLD, D. A., O'TOOLE, A. J., VETTER, T., & BLANZ, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
9. LEWIS, M. B., & JOHNSTON, R. A. (1999). Are caricatures special? Evidence of peak shift in face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 105-117.
10. MACKINNON, M. (1972). Adaptation-level theory, anchor theory, and the peak-shift phenomenon. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 1-12.
11. NALLAN, G. B., MCCOY, D. F., PACE, G. M., & WELCH, R. (1979). Generalization gradients following differential intradimensional autoshaping. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 48, 671-677.
12. SHEPARD, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323.
13. SPENCE, K. W. (1937). The differential response of animals to stimuli differing within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430-444.
14. SPETCH, M. L., CHENG, K., & CLIFFORD, C. W. G. (2004). Peak shift but not range effects in recognition of faces. Learning & Motivation, 35, 221-241.
15. THOMAS, D. R. (1962). The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 24-28.
16. THOMAS, D. R. (1993). A model for adaptation-level effects on stimulus generalization. Psychological Review, 100, 658-673.
17. THOMAS, D. R., & JONES, C. G. (1962). Stimulus generalization as a function of the frame of reference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 77-80.
18. THOMAS, D. R., MOOD, K., MORRISON, S., & WIERTELAK, E. (1991). Peak shift revisited: A test of alternative interpretations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 130-140.
19. THOMAS, D. R., SVINICKI, M. D., & VOGT, J. (1973). Adaptation level as a factor in human discrimination learning and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 210-219.
20. WEBSTER, M. A., KAPING, D., MIZOKAMI, Y., & DUHAMEL, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-561.
21. WEBSTER, M. A., & MACLIN, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647-653.