Topographic indices: Impact of data source

Soil Science

Volumn 171, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 800-809

  Pike, A C ^a   Mueller, Thomas G ^a   Mijatovic, B ^a   Koostra, B K ^b   Poulette, M M ^c   Prewitt, R M ^b   Shearer, S A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

GPS; RTK; Terrain analysis

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ELEVATION; GPS; KINEMATICS; LANDSCAPE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY;

KENTUCKY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750317516     PISSN: 0038075X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ss.0000230128.24513.b7     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bolstad, P. V., and T. Stowe. 1994. An evaluation of DEM accuracy: elevation, slope, and aspect. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 60:1327-1332.
2. Holmes, K. W., O. A. Chadwick, and P. C. Kyriakidis. 2000. Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling. J. Hydrol. 233:154-173.
3. Hutchinson, M. F., and J. C. Gallant. 2000. Digital elevation models and representation of terrain shape. In: Terrain Analysis: Principals and Applications. J. P. Wilson and J. C. Gallant (eds.). Wiley, New York.
4. Kravchenko, A. N., and D. G. Bullock. 2000. Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topographic and soil properties. Agron. J. 92:75-83.
5. Moore, I. D., G. J. Burch, and D. H. MacKenzie. 1988. Topographic effects on the distribution of surface soil water and the location of ephemeral gullies. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 31:1098-1107.
6. Schenk, A. F. 1996. Automatic generation of DEMs. In: Manual of Photogrammetry Addendum. C. Greve (ed.). Am. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD, pp. 145-150.
7. Shrivastava, K. P., and I. D. Moore. 1989. Application of terrain analysis to land resource investigations of small catchments in the Caribbean. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Erosion Control Association. Steamboat Springs, Colorado, pp. 229-242.
8. Sasowsky, K. C., G. W. Peterson, and B. M. Evans. 1992. Accuracy of SPOT digital elevation model and derivatives: utility for Alaska's north slope. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 58:815-824.
9. Thompson, J. A., J. C. Bell, C. A. Butler. 2001. Digital elevation model resolution: effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling. Geoderma 100:67-89.
10. USGS. 2000. US GeoData Digital Elevation Models. Fact Sheet 040-00. (http://erg.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs04000.html).
11. Wilson, J. P., D. J. Spangrud, G. A. Nielsen, J. S. Jacobsen, and D. A. Tyler. 1998. Global positioning system sampling intensity and pattern effects on computed topographic attributes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62:1410-1417.
12. Zhou, Q., and X. Liu. 2004. Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties. Comput. Geosci. 30:369-378.