Communication power optimization in a sensor network with a path-constrained mobile observer

ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 297-324

  Chakrabarti, Arnab ^a,b   Sabharwal, Ashutosh ^a,b   Aazhang, Behnaam ^a,b  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Mobility; Power; Queuing; Sensor network

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION POWER OPTIMIZATION; DATA COLLECTION; MOBILE OBSERVERS; SENSOR NETWORKS;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA REDUCTION; DATA TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBSERVABILITY; OPTIMIZATION;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

EID: 33750316239     PISSN: 15504859     EISSN: 15504867     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1167935.1167936     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. AILAWADHI, V. 2002. Mobility issue in hybrid ad hoc wireless sensor networks. Ph.D. dissertation, Electrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
2. BHATTACHARYA, P. AND EPHREMIDES, A. 1989. Optimal scheduling with strict deadlines. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 34, 1 (July), 721-728.
3. CHAKRABARTI, A., SABHARWAL, A., AND AAZHANG, B. 2003. Using predictable observer mobility for power efficient design of sensor networks. In Proceedings of IPSN, 129-145.
4. CHAKRABARTI, A., SABHARWAL, A., AND AAZHANG, B. 2004. Multi-hop communication is order-optimal for homogeneous sensor networks. In Proceedings of IPSN.
5. DIOOAVI, S., GROSSOLAUSER, M., AND TSE, D. 2002. Even one-dimensional mobility increases ad hoc wireless capacity. In Proceedings of ISIT. 352.
6. EL GAMAL, H. 2005. On the scaling laws of dense wireless sensor networks: The data gathering channel. IEEE Trans. Infomat. Theor. 51, 1229-1234.
7. GAMAL, A. E., MAMMEN, J., PRABHAKAR, B., AND SHAH, D. 2004. Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM.
8. GANDHAM, S., DAWANDE, M., PRAKASH, R., AND VENKATESAN, S. 2003. Energy efficient schemes for wireless sensor networks with multiple mobile base stations. In Proceedings of GLOBECOM. 377-381.
9. GROSSGLAUSER, M. AND TSE, D. 2001. Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM. Vol. 3. 1360-1369.
10. GUPTA, P. AND KUMAR, P. R. 2000. The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Trans. Informat. Theor. 46, 2(Mar.), 388-404.
11. ISHWAR, P., KUMAR, A., AND RAMCHANDRAN, K. 2003. On distributed sampling in dense sensor networks: A "bit-conservation" principle. In Proceedings of Allerton Conference. Invited paper.
12. KANSAL, A., RAHIMI, M., KAISER, W. J., SRIVASTAVA, M. B., POTTIE, G. J., AND ESTRIN, D. 2004. Controlled mobility for sustainable wireless networks. In. Proceedings of SECON.
13. RAO, R. AND KESIDIS, G. 2004. Purposeful mobility for relaying and surveillance in mobile ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 3, 225-232.
14. SHAH, R., ROY, S., JAIN, S., AND BRUNETTE, W. 2003. Data mules: Modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. In. Proceedings of SNPA. 30-41.
15. SLEPIAN, D. AND WOLF, J. 1973. Noiseless coding of correlated information sources. IEEE Trans. Informat. Theor. 19, 4 (July), 471-480.
16. TONG, L., ZHAO, Q., AND ADIREDDY, S. 2003. Sensor networks with mobile agents. In Proceedings of Military Communications Conference. 688-693.
17. WU, Q., RAO, N., BARKEN, J., IYENGER, S., VAISHNAVI, V., QI, H., AND CHAKRABARTY, K. 2004. On computing mobile agent routes for data fusion in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16, 740-753.