The structure of scientific knowledge and a fractal model of thought

Journal of Mind and Behavior

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 149-165

  Courtial, Jean Pierre ^a   Bailón Moreno, Rafael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biocognition; Fractals; Scientific knowledge

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; CONSCIOUSNESS; CULTURAL FACTOR; CYBERNETICS; GESTALT THERAPY; HEALING; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; THINKING;

EID: 33750313510     PISSN: 02710137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Anderson, C.M. (2000). From molecules to mindfulness. Consciousness and Emotion, 1, 193-226.
2. Bailón-Moreno, R. (2003). Ingeniería del conocimiento y vigilancia tecnológica aplicada a la investigación en el campo de los tensioactivos. Desarrollo de un modela ciencimétrico unificado. Doctoral Thesis, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
3. Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., Ruiz-Baños, R., and Courtial, J.P. (2005a). Bibliometric laws: Empirical flaws of fit. Scientometrics, 63, 209-229.
4. Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., Ruiz-Baños, R., and Courtial, J.P. (2005b). The unified scientometric model: Fractality and transfractality. Scientometrics, 63, 232-257.
5. Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., Ruiz-Baños, R., and Courtial, J.P. (2005c). Analysis of the scientific field of physical chemistry of the surfactants with the unified scientometrics model: Fit of relational activity indicators. Scientometrics, 63, 259-276.
6. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A.M., and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
7. Callon, M., and Courtial, J.P. (1995). La scientométrie au service de l'évaluation. In M. Callon, P. Laredo, and P. Mustar (Eds.), La gestion stratégique de la recherche et de la technologie (pp. 177-235). Paris: Economica.
8. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., and Laville F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155-205.
9. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., and Penan, H. (1993). La scientomé trie. Paris: P.U.F.
10. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., and Turner, W. (1991). La méthode Leximappe: Un outil pour l'analyse stratégique du développement scientifique et technique. In D. Vinck (Ed.), Gestion de la recherche (pp. 207-277). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
11. Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: MacMillan.
12. Courtial, J.P. (1992). Introduction à la scientométrie. Paris: Anthropos Economica.
13. Courtial, J.P. (2001). Cognition in language use: Pointing out relational structure of scientific texts. Metalinguistica, 9, 93-112.
14. Courtial, J.P. (2003). Analysis of scientists social representations in action based on words associated by scientific articles. European Review of Applied Psychology, 52, 221-230.
15. Courtial, J.P., and Gourdon, L. (1999). Mapping the dynamics of research on autism or the cultural logic of science. Theory and Psychology, 9, 579-604.
16. Courtial, J.P., and Le Dreff, G. (2003). Analyse de récits de femmes enceintes. Santé Publique, 16, 105-122.
17. Courtial, J.P., and Remy, J.C. (1988). Toward the cognitive management of a research institute. Research Policy, 17, 225-233.
18. Courtial, J.P., Sigogneau, A., and Callon, M. (1997). Identifying strategic sciences and technologies through scientometrics. In W.B. Ashton and R.A. Klavans (Eds.), Keeping abreast of science and technology (pp. 337-372) Columbus: Battelle.
19. Dolto, F. (1981). Au jeu du désir. Paris: Le Seuil.
20. Garfield, E. (1981). ISI atlas of science: Biochemistry and molecular biology. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
21. Girard, R. (1996). The Girard reader. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.
22. Guillaume, P. (1937). La psychologie de la forme. Paris: Flammarion
23. Feldmann, J.A., and Ballard, D.H. (1982). Connexionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science, 6, 205-254.
24. Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27. Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
28. Mandelbrot, M. (1977). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: Freeman.
29. Martinez, M.E. (2001). The process of knowing: A biocognitive epistemology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 22, 407-426.
30. Mialet, H. (1994). Le sujet de l'invention. Doctoral Thesis, University of Paris I (Sorbonne), Sociology Department, Paris, France.
31. Michael, M. (1996). Constructing identities. London: Sage.
32. Nottale, L. (1996). Scale relativity and fractal space-time: Applications to quantum physics, cosmology and chaotic systems. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 7, 877-938.
33. Nottale, L. (1998). La relativité dans tous ses états. Paris: Hachette.
34. Rifkin, J. (2000). L'âge de l'accès. Paris: La Découverte.
35. Schneuwly, B., and Bronckart, J.P. (1985). Vygotsky aujourd'hui. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
36. Shanon, B. (1993). Fractal patterns in language. New Ideas in Psychology, 11, 105-109.
37. Van Eersel, P. (1997). Réapprivoiser la mort. Paris: Albin Michel.
38. Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: Elsevier.
39. Watzlawick, P., Helmick-Beavin, J., and Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton.