Wang-Landau sampling of an asymmetric ising model: A study of the critical endpoint behavior

Brazilian Journal of Physics

Volumn 36, Issue 3 A, 2006, Pages 635-639

  Tsai, Shan Ho ^a   Wang, Fugao ^a,b   Landau, D P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical endpoint; Ising model; Three body interaction; Triangular lattice; Wang Landau sampling

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750313456     PISSN: 01039733     EISSN: 01039733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-97332006000500009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. M. E. Fisher and P. J. Upton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2402 (1990);
2. M. E. Fisher and P. J. Upton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3405 (1990);
3. M. E. Fisher, Physica A 172, 77 (1991).
4. T. A. L. Ziman, D. J. Amit, G. Grinstein, and C. Jayaprakash, Phys. Rev. B 25, 319 (1982).
5. J. A. Plascak and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev E 67, 015103(R) (2003).
6. M. E. Fisher and M. C. Barbosa, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11177 (1991);
7. M. C. Barbosa and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 43, 10635 (1991);
8. M. C. Barbosa, Phys. Rev. B 45, 5199 (1992).
9. N. B. Wilding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1488 (1997);
10. Phys. Rev. E 55, 6624 (1997).
11. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, second edition (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2005).
12. B. A. Berg and T. Neuhaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 9 (1992).
13. A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2635 (1988);
14. A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1195 (1989).
15. K. K. Chin and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 36, 275 (1987).
16. F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2050 (2001);
17. D. P. Landau and F. Wang, Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 674 (2002);
18. D. P. Landau, S.-H. Tsai, and M. Exler, Am. J. Phys. 72, 1294 (2004);
19. D. P. Landau and F. Wang, Braz. J. Phys. 34, 354 (2004).
20. F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. E. 64, 056101 (2001).
21. C. Yamaguchi and Y. Okabe, J. Phys. A 34, 8781 (2001).
22. Y. Okabe, Y. Tomita, and C. Yamaguchi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 146, 63 (2002).
23. M. Troyer, S. Wessel, and F. Alet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 120201 (2003).
24. P. N. Vorontsov-Velyaminov and A. P. Lyubartsev, J. Phys. A 36, 685 (2003).
25. W. Koller, A. Prüll, H. G. Evertz, and W. von der Linden, Phys. Rev. B 67, 104432 (2003).
26. T. S. Jain and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4226 (2003).
27. Q. L. Yan, R. Faller, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 8745 (2002).
28. R. Faller and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 4405 (2003).
29. E. B. Kim, R. Faller, Q. Yan, N. L. Abbott, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 7781 (2002).
30. T. S. Jain and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7238 (2002).
31. N. Rathore and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7225 (2002).
32. N. Rathore, T. A. Knotts, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4285 (2003).
33. T. J. H. Vlugt, Mol. Phys. 100, 2763 (2002).
34. F. Calvo, Mol. Phys. 100, 3421 (2002).
35. F. Calvo and P. Parneix, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 256 (2003).
36. M. A. de Menezes and A. R. Lima, Phys. A 323, 428 (2003).
37. V. Mustonen and R. Rajesh, J. Phys. A 36, 6651 (2003).
38. C. Yamaguchi and N. Kawashima, Phys. Rev. E 65, 056710 (2002).
39. B. J. Schulz, K. Binder, and M. Müller, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13, 477 (2002).
40. A. Huller and M. Pleimling, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C13, 947 (2002).
41. M. S. Shell, P. G. Debenedetti, and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056703 (2002).
42. B. J. Schulz, K. Binder, M. Müller, and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. E 67, 067102 (2003).
43. Y. Tomita and Y. Okabe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 572 (2001);
44. K. Binder, K. Vollmayr, H.-P. Deutsch, J. D. Reger, M. Scheucher, and D. P. Landau, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. C 3, 1025 (1992).
45. F. Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982).