Which high-density orchard planting system for replant sites in New York state is most productive and profitable?

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 636, Issue , 2004, Pages 701-709

  Robinson, Terence L ^a   Hoying, Stephen A ^b  

^a New York State Agricultural Experiment Station   (United States)

^b Mathematics Specialist Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Apple; Cash flow; Malus H domestica; Net present value; Planting system; Profitability; Rootstock; Tree density

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750308748     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.636.88     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Robinson, T.L. 1997. Interaction of tree form and rootstock on light interception, yield and yield efficiency of 'Empire' and 'Jonagold' trained to 4 systems. Acta Hort. 415:427-436.
2. Robinson, T.L and Hoying, S.A. 1999. What we learned about tree support from the 1998 Labor-Day storm. New York Fruit Quarterly 7(2):17-24.
3. Robinson, T.L. and Lakso, A.N. 1989. Light interception, yield and fruit quality of 'Empire' and 'Delicious' apple trees grown in four orchard systems. Acta Hort. 243:175-184.
4. Robinson, T.L., Hoying, S.A. and Smith, W.H. 1996. Apple orchard systems trials in New York. Compact Fruit Tree 29:107-113.
5. White, G.B. and A. DeMarree. 1992. Economics of apple orchard planting systems. Cornell Coop. Ext. Information Bulletin 227. Ithaca, NY.