Structured representations in the control of behavior cannot be so easily dismissed: A reply to Botvinick and Plaut (2006)

Psychological Review

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 929-931

  Cooper, Richard P ^a,b,d   Shallice, Tim ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c SISSA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; Control of routine behavior; Localist versus distributed representations; Neuropsychological impairments; Procedural memory; Sequential action; Simple recurrent networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750300833     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.929     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Ans, B., Rousset, S., French, R. M., & Musca, S. (2004). Self-refreshing memory in artificial neural networks: Learning temporal sequences without catastrophic forgetting. Connection Science, 16, 71-99.
2. Botvinick, M., & Flaut, D. C. (2004) Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychological Review, 111, 395-429.
3. Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2006). Such stuff as habits are made on: A reply to Cooper and Shallice (2006). Psychological Review, 113, 917-928.
4. Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2006). Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Review, 113, 887-916.
5. Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 103-187). New York: Wiley.
6. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and the neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
7. Reason, J. T. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In W. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 515-549). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8. Rumiati, R. I., Zanini, S., Vorano, L., & Shallice, T. (2001). A form of ideational apraxia as a selective deficit of contention scheduling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 617-642.
9. Schwartz, M. F., Montgomery, M. W., Buxbaum, L. J., Lee, S. S., Carew, T. G., Coslett, H. B., et al. (1998). Naturalistic action impairment in Closed Head Injury. Neuropsychology, 12, 13-28.
10. Schwartz, M. F., Reed. E. S., Montgomery, M. W., Palmer, C., & Mayer. N. H. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 381-414.