Fostering clarity in kin recognition designs: reply to Todrank & Heth

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Holmes, Warren G ^a   Mateo, Jill M ^b  

^a Institute for Cognitive and Decision Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KIN RECOGNITION;

HETH;

EID: 33750299637     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alexander R.D. Social learning and kin recognition. Ethology and Sociobiology 12 (1991) 387-399
2. Buckle G.R., and Greenberg L. Nestmate recognition in sweat bees (Lasioglossum zephyrum): does an individual recognize its own odour or only odours of its nestmates?. Animal Behaviour 29 (1981) 802-809
3. Gamboa G.J., Reeve H.K., and Holmes W.G. Conceptual issues and methodology in kin-recognition research: a critical discussion. Ethology 88 (1991) 109-127
4. Getz W.M. The honey bee as a model kin recognition system. In: Hepper P.G. (Ed). Kin Recognition (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 358-412
5. Hauber M.E., and Sherman P.W. Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends in Neurosciences 24 (2001) 609-616
6. Heth G., Todrank J., and Johnston R.E. Kin recognition in golden hamsters: evidence for phenotype matching. Animal Behaviour 56 (1998) 409-417
7. Holmes W.G. Kin recognition by phenotype matching in female Belding's ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour 34 (1986) 38-47
8. Holmes W.G., and Sherman P.W. The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist 22 (1982) 491-517
9. Lacy R.C., and Sherman P.W. Kin recognition by phenotype matching. American Naturalist 121 (1983) 489-512
10. Mateo J.M., and Holmes W.G. Cross-fostering as a means to study kin recognition. Animal Behaviour 68 (2004) 1451-1459
11. Mateo J.M., and Johnston R.E. Kin recognition and the 'armpit effect': evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 267 (2000) 695-700
12. Penn D., and Potts W.K. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265 (1998) 1299-1306
13. Todrank J., and Heth G. Odor-genes covariance and genetic relatedness assessments: rethinking odor-based 'recognition' mechanisms in rodents. Advances in the Study of Behavior 32 (2003) 77-130
14. Todrank J., and Heth G. Crossed assumptions foster misinterpretations about kin recognition mechanisms. Animal Behaviour 72 (2006) e1-e3. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav