Rehabilitation and resettlement: A study of prolific offender case management in Birmingham, United Kingdom

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 691-710

  Millie, Andrew ^a   Erol, Rosie ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case management; Partnership; Prolific and other priority offenders; Rehabilitation; Resettlement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; FEMALE; HOME; HUMAN; MALE; OFFENDER; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CASE MANAGEMENT; CATCHMENT AREA (HEALTH); CRIME; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 33750293668     PISSN: 0306624X     EISSN: 15526933     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X06287193     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. A. (1986). Criminal careers and career criminals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Burnett, R. (1996). Fitting supervision to offenders: Assessment and allocation decisions in the Probation Service (Home Office Research Study 153). London: Home Office.
5. Carter, P. (2003). Managing offenders, reducing crime - A new approach. London: Prime Minister's Strategy Unit.
6. Chapman, T., & Hough, M. (1998). Evidence based practice: A guide for effective practice. London: Home Office.
7. Chui, W. H., Tupman, B., & Farlow, C. (2003). Listening to young adult offenders: Views on the effect of a police-probation initiative on reducing crime. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 263-281.
8. Clarke, A., Simmonds, R., & Wydall, S. (2004). Delivering cognitive skills programmes in prison: A qualitative study (Home Office Online Report 27/04). London: Home Office.
9. Crawford, A. (1998). Crime prevention and community safety: Politics, policies and practices. Harlow, UK: Longman.
10. Criminal Justice System. (2002a). Narrowing the justice gap. London: Author.
11. Criminal Justice System. (2002b). Narrowing the justice gap: Guidance on tackling persistent offending. London: Author.
12. Dawson, P. (2005). Early findings from the prolific and other priority offenders evaluation (Home Office Development and Practice Report 46). London: Home Office.
13. Dobson, G. (2004). Get Carter. Probation Journal, 51, 144-154.
14. Erol, R., & Millie, A. (2005a). Getting ready for the PPO strategy: Managing prolific and other priority offenders in Birmingham: A report for the Birmingham Community Safety Partnership. Wolverhampton, UK: Policy Research Institute.
15. Erol, R., & Millie, A. (Eds.). (2005b). Strengthening multi-agency public protection arrangements (MAPPAs) (Home Office Development and Practice Report 45 based on a report by H. Kemshall, G. Mackenzie, J. Wood, R. Bailey, & J. Yates). London: Home Office.
16. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Fulton, B. (2001). Intensive supervision in probation and parole settings. In C. Hollin (Ed.), The handbook of offender assessment and treatment (pp. 195-204). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
17. Government Office for the West Midlands. (2003). Street crime progress report 16 - Report to the street crime action team, 2nd October 2003. Birmingham, UK: Author.
18. Harper, G., Man, L.-H., Taylor, S., & Niven, S. (2005). Factors associated with offending. In G. Harper & C. Chitty (Eds.), The impact of corrections on re-offending: A review of "what works" (Home Office Research Study 29; pp. 17-30). London: Home Office.
19. Hearnden, I., & Millie, A. (2003). Investigating links between probation enforcement and reconviction (Home Office Online Report 41/03). London: Home Office.
20. Hearnden, I., & Millie, A. (2004). Does tougher enforcement lead to lower reconviction? Probation Journal, 51, 48-58.
21. Home Office. (2001). Criminal justice: The way ahead. London: HMSO.
22. Home Office. (2002). OASys (Offender Assessment System) manual version two. London: Author.
23. Home Office. (2003). Streets ahead: A joint inspection report of the Street Crime Initiative. London: Author.
24. Home Office. (2004a). Joint inspection report into persistent and prolific offenders. London: Author.
25. Home Office. (2004b). Prolific and other priority offender strategy - Initial guidance: Catch and convict framework, July 2004. London: Author.
26. Home Office. (2004c). Prolific and other priority offender strategy - Supplementary guidance: Rehabilitate and resettle framework, September 2004. London: Author.
27. Home Office. (2004d). Prolific and other priority offender strategy - Guidance paper 3: Prevent and deter, September 2004. London: Author.
28. Home Office. (2004e). Reducing crime, changing lives. London: Author.
29. Home Office. (2004f). Reducing reoffending: National action plan - Reference document, July 2004. London: Author.
30. Home Office. (2005). Prolific and other priority offenders - Headline measures, February 2005. Retrieved on May 15, 2005, from http://www. crimereduction.gov.uk/ppo.htm
31. Homes A., Walmsley, R., & Debidin, M. (2005). Intensive supervision and monitoring schemes for persistent offenders: Staff and offender perceptions (Home Office Development and Practice Report 41). London: Home Office.
32. Kemshall, H., & Maguire, M. (2001). Public protection, partnership and risk penalty: The multi-agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders. Punishment and Society, 3, 237-264.
33. Mawby, R. C., & Worrall, A. (2004). "Polibation" revisited: Policing, probation and prolific offender projects. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 6(2), 63-73.
34. McGuire, J. (Ed.). (2002). Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
35. Nash, M. (1999). Enter the "polibation officer." International Journal of Police Science & Management, 1, 360-368.
36. Nash, M. (2004). "Polibation revisited" - A reply to Mawby and Worrall. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 6(2), 74-76.
37. National Offender Management Service. (2005). The NOMS offender management model, version 1, January 2005. London: National Offender Management Service, Offender Management Workshop Team.
38. Niven, S., & Stewart, D. (2005). Resettlement outcomes on release from prison in 2003 (Home Office Research Findings 248). London: Home Office.
39. Partridge, S. (2004). Examining case management models for community sentences (Home Office Online Report 17/04). London: Home Office.
40. Pearson, F. (1988). Evaluation of New Jersey's Intensive Supervision Program. Crime and Delinquency, 34, 437-448.
41. Project Chrysalis. (2004a). Guide to joint offender management, Birmingham, UK: West Midlands Police.
42. Project Chrysalis. (2004b). Project Chrysalis newsletter July 2004. Birmingham, UK: West Midlands Police.
43. Project Chrysalis. (2005). Statistical breakdown of convicted street crime offenders identified by Project Chrysalis, October 2003-January 2005. Birmingham, UK: West Midlands Police.
44. Robinson, G. (2005). What works in offender management? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 307-318.
45. Sarno, C., Hearnden, I., Hedderman, C., Hough, M., Nee, C., & Herrington, V. (2000). Working their way out of offending: An evaluation of two probation employment schemes (Home Office Research Study 218). London: Home Office.
46. Tarling, R., Davison, T., & Clarke, A. (2004). Mentoring projects: The national evaluation of the Youth Justice Board's mentoring projects. London: Youth Justice Board.
47. Townsley, M., & Pease, K. (2002). How efficiently can we target prolific offenders? International Journal of Police Science & Management, 4, 323-331.
48. Underdown, A. (1998). Strategies for effective offender supervision: Report of the HMIP what works project. London: Home Office.
49. Vennard, J., & Hedderman, C. (1998). Effective interventions with offenders. In P. Goldblatt & C. Lewis (Eds.), Reducing offending: An assessment of research evidence on ways of dealing with offender behaviour (Home Office Research Study 187; pp. 101-120). London: Home Office.
50. Worrall, A., Mawby, R. C., Heath, G., & Hope, T. (2003). Intensive supervisions and monitoring projects (Home Office Online Report 42/03). London: Home Office.