Radiology reporting: Returning to our image-centric roots

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 187, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1151-1155

  Reiner, Bruce ^a   Siegel, Eliot ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Digital images; PACS; Radiology practice; Radiology reporting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE CENTRIC REPORT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750288434     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1954     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Naik SS, Hanbridge A, Wilson SR. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR 2001; 176:591-598
2. Reiner B, Siegel E, Protopapas Z, et al. Impact of filmless radiology on the frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists. AJR 1999; 173:1169-1172
3. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Weiss DL. The evolution of the radiology report and the development of speech recognition. In: Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Weiss DL, eds. Electronic reporting in the digital medical enterprise. Great Falls, VA: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2003:1-7
4. Clinger NJ, Hunter TB, Hillman BJ. Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians. Radiology 1988; 169:825-826
5. Lafortune M, Breton G, Baudouin JL. The radiological report: what is useful for the referring physician? Can Assoc Radiol J 1988; 39:140-143
6. Gagliardi RA. The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR 1995; 164:501-502
7. Phillips v Good Samaritan Hospital, 416 NE2d 646 (Ohio App 1979)
8. Jenoff v Gleason, 521 A2d 1323 (N.J. Super Ct App Div 1987)
9. Corteau v Dodd, 773 SW2d 436 (Ark, App 1989)
10. Levinson W. Physician-patient communication: a key to malpractice prevention. JAMA 1994; 272:1619-1620
11. Berlin L. Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: whither goest the radiologist's duty? AJR 2002; 178:809-815
12. American College of Radiology. ACR standards for the performance of screening mammography. In: Practice guidelines & technical standards. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1990
13. American College of Radiology. ACR standard for communication: diagnostic radiology. In: Practice guidelines & technical standards. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995
14. American College of Radiology. ACR Standard for communication: diagnostic radiology. In: Practice guidelines & technical standards 2000-2001. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2000:1-3
15. Siegel EL. Goodbye, Mr. Cox: time for automated closure of the radiology communication loop. Appl Radiol 2005; 34:212-213
16. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Shastri K. The future of radiology reporting. In: Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Weiss DL, eds. Electronic reporting in the digital medical enterprise. Great Falls, VA: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2003:83-104
17. Johnson AJ. Radiology report quality: a cohort study of point-and-click structured reporting versus conventional dictation. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:1056-1061
18. Langlotz CP. Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revolution in radiology. Radiology 2002; 224:5-7
19. Sobel J, Pearson M, Gross K, et al. Information content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:709-717
20. Langlotz CP, Caldwell SA. The completeness of existing lexicons for representing radiology report information. J Digit Imaging 2002; 15:201-205
21. Radiological Society of North America. RadLex: a lexicon for uniform indexing and retrieval of radiology information resources. Available at: mirc.rsna.org/radlex/service. Accessed September 21, 2005
22. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. DICOM structured reporting workshop on standard development. Available at: medical.nema.org/dicom/srag. hrml. Accessed September 21, 2005