Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 797-813

  Ferreira, Mario B ^a   Garcia Marques, Leonel ^a   Sherman, Steven J ^b   Sherman, Jeffrey W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Dual process approach; Heuristic reasoning; Judgment; Process dissociation; Rule based reasoning; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTUITION; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; INTUITION; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 33750285637     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.797     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Ajzen, I. (1977). Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on predictions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 303-314.
2. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes, Vol. 1 (2nd ed., pp. 1-40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bar-Hillel, M. (1979). The role of sample size in sample evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 24, 243-257.
4. Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44, 211-233.
5. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
6. Bless, H., & Shwarz, N. (1999). Sufficient and necessary conditions in dual-process models: The case of mood and information processing. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 423-440). New York: Guilford Press.
7. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual-process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Brewer, W., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119-160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments? Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 197-220.
10. Camerer, C. F. (1987). Do bias in probability judgments matter in markets'? Experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 77, 981-997.
11. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Cohen, C. E. (1981). Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 441-452.
14. Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad-model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469-487.
15. Correl, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314-1329.
16. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 531-547.
17. Debner, J. A., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 304-317.
18. Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819-829.
19. Epstein, S. (1991). Cognitive-experiential self theory: An integrative theory of personality. In R. Curtis (Ed.), The self with others: Convergences in psychoanalytical, social, and personality psychology (pp. 111-137). New York: Guilford Press.
20. Epstein, S. (1994). An integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
21. Epstein, S., Donovan, S., & Denes-Raj, V. (1999). The missing link in the paradox of the Linda conjunction problem: Beyond knowing and thinking of the conjunction rule, the intrinsic appeal of heuristic processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 204-214.
22. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
23. Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Ferreira, M. B., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2003). O papel do reconhecimento do acaso no raciocínio indutivo. The role of perception of randomness on inductive reasoning. Análise Psicologica, 3, 353-374.
25. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
26. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. E. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293-328.
29. Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond "heuristics and biases". In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 83-115). Chichester, England: Wiley.
30. Ginossar, Z., & Trope, Y. (1987). Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 464-474.
31. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1967). Signal detection theory and psycho-physics. New York: Wiley.
32. Griffin, D., Gonzalez, R., & Varey, C. (2001). The heuristics and biases approach to judgment under uncertainty. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (Vol. 1, pp. 207-235). London: Blackwell.
33. Hartwick, J. (1979). Memory for trait information: A signal detection analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 533-552.
34. Hay, J. F., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Separating habit and recollection: Memory slips, process dissociations, and probability matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1323-1335.
35. Hollender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
36. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
37. Jacoby, L. L., Debner, J. A., & Hay, J. F. (2001). Proactive interference, accessibility, and process dissociations: Valid subjective reports of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 686-700.
38. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 326-338.
39. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
40. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
41. Jepson, D., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1983). Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 494-501.
42. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
43. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
46. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
47. Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Epstein, S. (1992). Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 534-544.
48. Klauer, K. C., & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
49. Kruglanski, A. W., Friedland, N., & Farkash, E. (1984). Lay persons' sensitivity to statistical information: The case of high perceived applicability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 503-518.
50. Krull, D. S., & Dill, J. C. (1996). On thinking first and responding fast: Flexibility in social inference processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 949-959.
51. Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
52. Lambert, A. J., Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., Shaffer, L. M., Chasteen, A. L., & Khan, S. R. (2003). Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 277-295.
53. LaRue, A., & Olejnik, A. B. (1980). Cognitive "priming" of principles of moral thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 413-416.
54. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experirnental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 219-234.
55. Miller, D. T., Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1989). When a coincidence is suspicious: The role of mental simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 581-589.
56. Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339-363.
57. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
58. Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., & Lambert, A. J. (2005). Attitudes and accessibility bias: Dissociating automatic and controlled processes. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 393-420). New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque. IA: Brown.
60. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
61. Rumelhart, D. E. (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 161-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Sherman, J. W. (2006). On building a better process model: It's not only how many, but which ones and by which means? Psychological Inquiry, 17, 173-184.
63. Sherman, J. W., Groom, C. J., Ehrenberg, K., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Bearing false witness under pressure: Implicit and explicit components of stereotype-driven memory distortions. Social Cognition, 21, 213-246.
64. Sherman, S. J., & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 189-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 199, 3-22.
66. Sloman, S. A., & Rips, L. J. (1998). Similarity as an explanatory construct. Cognition, 65, 2-3, 87-101.
67. Smith, E. R. (1994). Procedural knowledge and processing strategies in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 99-151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Smith, E. R., & DcCoster, J. (1999). A conncctionist interpretation of dual-process models. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 323-336). New York: Guilford Press.
69. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
70. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161-188.
71. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/ acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349-385.
72. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.
73. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 421-440). New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2005). Reflection and impulse as determinants of conscious and unconscious motivation. In J. Forgas, K. Williams, & S. Laham (Eds.), Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes (pp. 91-112). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
75. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies on the interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239-245.
76. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M. & Jacoby. L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations following elaborative processes and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 290-303.
77. Trope, Y., & Alfieri, T. (1997). Effortfulness and flexibility of disposition al inference processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 662-675.
78. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Review, 2, 105-110.
79. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
80. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974, September). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
81. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base-rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncer tainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153-160). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
82. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
83. Weber, E. U., Goldstein, W. M., & Barlas, S. (1995). Let us not forget about memory: The role of memory processes and techniques in the study of judgment and choice. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 33-81.
84. Weber, E. U., Goldstein, W. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1991). Beyond strategies: Implications of memory representation and memory processes for models of judgment and decision making. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 75-100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Wegner, D. M., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 446-496). New York: McGraw-Hill.
86. Zukier, H., & Pepitone, A. (1984). Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determinants of the use of base-rate information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 349-360.