Landmarks in OpenLS - A data structure for cognitive ergonomic route directions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4197 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 128-144

  Hansen, Stefan ^a   Richter, Kai Florian ^a   Klippel, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; ROUTERS; SEMANTICS;

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS; LANDMARKS; STREET NETWORKS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750270580     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11863939_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bychowski, T. (2003). OpenGIS Location Services (OpenLS): Part 6 - Navigation Service. OGC Implementation Specification 03-007rl (Version 0.5.0). Open GIS Consortium Inc.
2. Brenner, C., Elias, B. (2003). Extracting landmarks for car navigation systems using existing GIS databases and laser scanning. Proc. Photogrammetric Image Analysis, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIV, Part 3/W8. München.
3. Couclelis, H., Golledge, R.G., Gale, N., Tobler, W. (1987). Exploring the anchorpoint hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7 (2):99-122.
4. Dale, R., Geldof, S., Prost, J.-P. (2003). CORAL: Using natural language generation for navigational assistance. In: Oudshoorn, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC2003), Adelaide, Australia.
5. Denis, M. (1997). The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 16:409-458.
6. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., C.Cornoldi & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13:145-174.
7. Elias, B. (2003) Extracting Landmarks with Data Mining Methods, in: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F. and Timpf, S., eds: "Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science", Vol. 2825, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, Springer, P. 398-412
8. Hirtle, S.C., Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of Hierarchies in Cognitive Maps. Memory & Cognition 3(13):208-217.
9. Klippel, A. (2003). Wayfinding Choremes. Conceptualizing Wayfinding and Route Direction Elements. Universität Bremen.
10. Klippel, A., Tappe, T., Habel, C. (2003). Pictorial representations of routes: Chunking route segments during comprehension. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, and K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition III. Routes and Navigation, Human Memory and Learning, Spatial Representation and Spatial Learning (pp. 11-33). Springer, Berlin.
11. Klippel, A., Hansen, S., Davies, J., Winter, S. (2005). A High-Level Cognitive Framework For Route Directions. Proceedings of SSC 2005 Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis: The national biennial Conference of the Spatial Science Institute. September 2005. Melbourne:Spatial Science Institute. ISBN 0-95813662-9
12. Klippel, A., Richter, K.-F., Hansen, S. (2005). Structural salience as a landmark. Workshop Mobile Maps 2005, Salzburg, Austria.
13. Klippel, A., Tappe, T., Kulik, L., Lee, P.U. (2005). Wayfinding choremes - A language for modeling conceptual route knowledge. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 16(4):311-329.
14. Klippel, A., Richter, K.-F., Hansen, S. (in prep.). Conceptualization of landmarks - a functional-geometric ontology.
15. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Maaß, W. (1993). A cognitive model for the process of multimodal, incremental route descriptions. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I. (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory. A Theoretical Basis for GIS (pp. 1-13), European Conference COSIT. Springer, Berlin.
17. Mabrouk, M. (2005). OpenGIS Location Services (OpenLS): Core Services. OGC Implementation Specification 05-016 Version 1.1. Open GIS Consortium Inc.
18. Mark, D. M. (1985). Finding simple routes: 'Ease of description' as an objective function in automated route selection. In: Proceedings, Second Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Applications (IEEE) (pp. 577-581), Miami Beach
19. Michon, P.-E., Denis, M. (2001). When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello, D.R. (Ed.), Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science (pp. 292-305). International Conference, COSIT 2001. Springer, Berlin.
20. Presson, C.C., Montello, D.R. (1988). Points of reference in spatial cognition: Stalking the elusive landmark. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6:378-381.
21. Raubal, M., Winter, S (2002). Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (Eds.), Geographic Information Science (pp. 243-259). Springer, Berlin.
22. Richter, K.-F., Klippel, A. (2005). A model for context-specific route directions. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (Eds.), Spatial Cognition IV. Reasoning, Action, and Interaction: International Conference Spatial Cognition 2004 (pp. 58-78). Springer, Berlin.
23. Siegel, A.W., White, S.H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese, H.W. (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behaviour (pp. 9-55), Academic Press, New York.
24. Sorrows, M. E. and Hirtle, S. C. (1999). The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In Freksa C. and Mark, D. M. (eds), Spatial Information Theory, number 1661 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.
25. Tom, A., Denis, M. (2003). Referring to landmark or street information in route directions: What difference does it make?. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M., Timpf, S. (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science (pp. 362-374). International Conference, COSIT 2003. Springer, Berlin.
26. Tomko, M., Winter S. (2005). Reconstruction of scenes from georeferenced web resources. In: Proceedings of SSC 2005 Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis: The National Biennial Conference of the Spatial Science Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
27. Tversky, B., Lee, P.U. (1998). How Space Structures Language. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K. F. (Eds.), Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge. Springer, Berlin.
28. Tversky, B., Lee, P.U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (Eds.), Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (pp. 51-64). Springer, Berlin.
29. Waller, D., Montello, D.R., Richardson, A.E., Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28:1051-1063.
30. Winter, S. (2003). Route adaptive selection of salient features. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science (pp. 320-334). International Conference, COSIT 2003. Springer, Berlin.
31. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. In: Psychological Bulletin Vol. 123, (pp 162-185)