Attack preference of Ips pini on Pinus ponderosa in northern Arizona: Tree size and bole position

Agricultural and Forest Entomology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 295-303

  Kolb, T E ^a   Guerard, N ^a   Hofstetter, R W ^a   Wagner, M R ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bark beetle; Bark thickness; Phloem thickness; Resin defense; Water relations

Indexed keywords

COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; IPS PINI; PINUS PONDEROSA; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 33750257788     PISSN: 14619555     EISSN: 14619563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2006.00308.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Amezaga, I. & Rodriguez, M.A. (1998) Resource partitioning of four sympatric bark beetles depending on swarm dates and tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 109, 127-135.
2. Amman, G.D. (1972) Mountain pine beetle brood production in relation to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. Journal of Economic Entomology, 65, 138-140.
3. Ayres, B.D., Ayres, M.P., Abrahamson, M.D. & Teale, S.A. (2001) Resource partitioning and overlap in three sympatric species of Ips bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Oecologia, 128, 443-453.
4. Berryman, A.A. (1976) Theoretical explanation of mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Environmental Entomology, 5, 1225-1233.
5. Bickford, C., Kolb, T.E. & Geils, B.W. (2005) Host physiological condition positively affects dwarf mistletoe shoot growth: Arceuthobium vaginatum subsp. cryptopodum on Pinus ponderosa. Oecologia, 146, 179-189.
6. Bucci, S.J., Scholz, F.G., Goldstein, G., Meinzer, F.C., Hinojosa, J.A., Hoffman, W.A. & Franco, A.C. (2004) Processes preventing noctural equilibration between leaf and soil water potential in tropical savanna woody species. Tree Physiology, 24, 1119-1127.
7. Byers, J.A. (1995) Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles. Chemical Ecology of Insects 2 (ed. by R.T. Carde and W. J. Bell), pp. 154-213. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York.
8. Cates, R.G. & Alexander, H. (1982) Host resistance and susceptibility. Bark Beetles in North American Conifers: Ecology and Evolution (ed. by J.B. Milton and K.B. Sturgeon), pp. 212-263. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.
9. Coulson, R.N. & Witter, J.A. (1984) Forest Entomology: Ecology and Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
10. Donovan, L.A., Linton, M.J. & Richards, J.H. (2001) Predawn plant water potential does not necessarily equilibrate with soil water potential under well-watered conditions. Oecologia, 129, 328-335.
11. Eidmann, H.H. (1992) Impact of bark beetles on forests and forestry in Sweden. Journal of Applied Entomology, 114, 193-200.
12. Erbilgin, N., Nordheim, E.V., Aukema, B.H. & Raffa, K.F. (2002) Population dynamics of Ips pini and Ips grandicollis in red pine plantations in Wisconsin: within- and between-year associations with predators, competitors, and habitat quality. Environmental Entomology, 31, 1043-1051.
13. Feeney, S.R., Kolb, T.E., Covington, W.W. & Wagner, M.R. (1998) Influence of thinning and burning restoration treatments on presettlement ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 1295-1306.
14. Fischer, D.G., Kolb, T.E. & DeWald, L.E. (2002) Changes in wholetree water relations during ontogeny of Pinus flexilis and P. ponderosa in a high-elevation Northern Arizona meadow. Tree Physiology, 22, 675-685.
15. Flamm, R.O., Wagner, T.L., Cook, S.P., Pulley, P.E., Coulson, R.N. & McArdle, T.M. (1987) Host colonization by cohabiting Dendroctonus frontalis, Ips avulsus, and I. calligraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmetal Entomology, 16, 390-399.
16. Furniss, R.L. & Carolin, V.M. (1977) Western Forest Insects. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication, Number 1339. USDA, Washington, District of Colombia.
17. Gaylord, M.L., Kolb, T.E., Wallin, K.F. & Wagner, M.R. (2006) Seasonality and lure preference of bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and associates in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Environmental Entomology, 35, 37-47.
18. Graham, S.A. & Knight, F.B. (1965) Principles of Forest Entomology, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
19. Haack, R.A., Foltz, J.L. & Wilkinson, R.C. (1984) Longevity and fecundity of Ips calligraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in relation to slash pine phloem thickness. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 77, 657-662.
20. Hedgren, P.O. & Schroeder, L.M. (2004) Reproductive success of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) and occurrence of associated species: a comparison between standing beetle-killed trees and cut trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 203, 241-250.
21. Hindmarch, T.D. & Reid, M.L. (2001) Forest thinning affects reproduction in pine engravers (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) breeding in felled lodgepole pine trees. Environmental Entomology, 30, 919-924.
22. Hubbard, R.M., Bond, B.J. & Ryan, M.R. (1999) Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiology, 19, 165-172.
23. Kaufmann, M.R. & Thor, G.L. (1982) Measurement of water stress in subalpine trees: effects of temporary tissue storage methods and needle age. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 12, 969-972.
24. Kegley, S.J., Livingston, R.L. & Gibson, K.E. (1997) Pine Engraver, Ips pini (Say), in the Eestern United States. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Insect Disease Leaflet, Number 122. USDA, Washington, District of Colombia.
25. Klepzig, K.D., Smalley, E.B. & Raffa, K.F. (1996) Combined chemical defences against an insect-fungal complex. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22, 1367-1388.
26. Klepzig, K.D., Raffa, K.F. & Smalley, E.B. (1991) Association of insect-fungal complexes with red pine decline in Wisconsin. Forest Science, 37, 1119-1139.
27. Kolb, T.E., Holmberg, K.M., Wagner, M.R. & Stone, J.E. (1998) Regulation of ponderosa pine foliar physiology and insect resistance mechanisms by basal area treatments. Tree Physiology, 18, 375-381.
28. Kolb, P.F. & Robberecht, R. (1996) Pinus ponderosa seedling establishment and the influence of competition with the bunchgrass Agropyron spicatum. International Journal of Plant Science, 4, 509-515.
29. Kolb, T.E. & Stone, J.E. (2000) Differences in leaf gas exchange and water relations among species and tree sizes in an Arizona pine-oak forest. Tree Physiology, 20, 1-12.
30. Lieutier, F. (2002) Mechanisms of resistance in conifers and bark beetle attack strategies. Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects (ed. by M.R. Wagner, K.M. Clancy, F. Lieutiers and T.D. Paine), pp. 31-77. Kluwer Acadmic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts.
31. Livingston, R.L. (1979) The pine engraver Ips pini (Say), in Idaho; life history, habits and management recommendations. Idaho Department of Lands, Forest Insect Disease Conditions Report, 79, 3.
32. Lorio, P.L. Jr (1993) Environmental stress and whole-tree physiology. Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests (ed. by T.D. Schowalter and G.M. Filip), pp. 81-101. Academic Press, U.K.
33. Lorio, P.L. Jr & Sommers, R.A. (1986) Evidence of competition for photosynthates between growth processes and oleoresin synthesis in Pinus taeda L. Tree Physiology, 2, 301-306.
34. McDowell, N., Banard, H., Bond, B.J. et al. (2002) The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia, 132, 12-20.
35. Miller, G., Ambos, N., Boness, P. et al. (1995) Terrestrial Ecosystems Survey of the Coconino National Forest. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwestern Region Miscellaneous Publication. USDA, Washington, District of Colombia.
36. Nebeker, T.E., Hodges, J.D. & Blanche, C.A. (1993) Host response to bark beetle and pathogen colonization. Beetle Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests (ed. by T.D. Schowalter and G.M. Filip), pp. 157-173. Academic Press, New York, New York.
37. Parker, D.L. (1991) Integrated Pest Management Guide: Arizona Five-Spinned Ips, Ips lecontei Swaine, and Pine Engraver, Ips pini (Say), in Ponderosa Pine. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwestern Region Miscellaneous Publication, R-3 91-8. USDA, Canada.
38. Raffa, K.F., Philips, T.W. & Salom, S.M. (1993) Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests (ed. by T.D. Schowalter and G.M. Filip), pp. 103-128. Academic Press, U.K.
39. Redmer, J.S., Wallin, K.F. & Raffa, K.F. (2001) Effect of host tree seasonal phenology on substrate suitability for the pine engraver (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): implications for population dynamics and enemy free space. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94, 844-849.
40. Reid, M.L. & Glubish, S.S. (2001) Tree size and growth history predict breeding densities of Douglas-fir beetles in fallen trees. Canadian Entomologist, 133, 697-704.
41. Reid, M.L. & Robb, T. (1999) Death of vigorous trees benefits bark beetles. Oecologia, 120, 555-562.
42. Rudinsky, J.A. (1962) Ecology of Scolytidae. Annual Review of Entomology, 7, 327-348.
43. Schafer, K.V.R., Oren, R. & Tenhunen, J.D. (2000) The effect of tree height on crown level stomatal conductance. Plant Cell Environment, 23, 365-375.
44. Schenk, J.A. & Benjamin, D.M. (1969) Notes on the biology of Ips pini in central Wisconsin jack pine forests. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 62, 480-485.
45. Skov, K.R., Kolb, T.E. & Wallin, K.F. (2004) Tree size and drought affect ponderosa pine physiological response to thinning and burning treatments. Forest Science, 50, 81-91.
46. Steed, B.E. (2003) Factors affecting the ecology and management of. Ips Pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in northern Arizona and western Montana. PhD Dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
47. Steed, B.E. & Wagner, M.R. (2004) Importance of log size on host selection and reproductive success of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in ponderosa pine slash of northern Arizona and western Montana. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 436-450.
48. Stone, J.E., Kolb, T.E. & Covington, W.W. (1999) Effects of restoration thinning on presettlement Pinus ponderosa in northern Arizona. Restoration Ecology, 7, 172-182.
49. Svenson, S.E. & Davies, J.R. (1992) Comparison of methods for estimated surface area of water-stressed and fully hydrated pine needle segments for gas exchange analysis. Tree Physiology, 10, 417-421.
50. Villa-Castillo, J. & Wagner, M.R. (1996) Effect of overstory density on Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) performance in ponderosa pine slash. Journal of Economic Entomology, 89, 1537-1545.
51. Wallin, K.F., Kolb, T.E., Skov, K. & Wagner, M.R. (2003) Effects of crown scorch on ponderosa pine resistance to bark beetles in northern Arizona. Environmental Entomology, 32, 652-661.
52. Wermelinger, B. (2004) Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus-a review of recent research. Forest Ecology and Management, 202, 67-82.
53. Weslien, J. (1994) Interactions within and between species at different densities of the bark beetle Ips typographus and its predator Thanasimus formicarius. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 71, 133-143.
54. Williams, M., Bond, B.J. & Ryan, M.R. (2001) Evaluating different soil and plant hydraulic constraints on tree function using a model and sap flow data from ponderosa pine. Plant Cell Environment, 24, 379-390.
55. Wood, S.L. (1982) The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). A Taxonomic Monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
56. Yoder, B.J., Ryan, M.G., Waring, R.H., Schoettle, A.W. & Kaufmann, M.R. (1994) Evidence of reduced photosynthetic rates in old trees. Forest Science, 40, 513-527.
57. Zausen, G.L., Kolb, T.E., Bailey, J.D. & Wagner, M.R. (2005) Longterm impacts of thinning and prescribed burning on ponderosa pine physiology and bark beetle abundance in northern Arizona: a replicated landscape study. Forest Ecology and Management, 218, 291-305.