Evolving a real-world vehicle warning system

GECCO 2006 - Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1681-1688

  Kohl, Nate ^a   Stanley, Kenneth ^b   Miikkulainen, Risto ^a   Samples, Michael ^c   Sherony, Rini ^d  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b University of Central Florida   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d TOYOTA TECHNICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

NEAT; Neuroevolution; Real world; Vehicle

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LASER APPLICATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS;

AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS; NEUROEVOLUTION; VEHICLE WARNING SYSTEM;

AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33750244566     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1143997.1144273     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. N. H. T. S. Administration. Traffic safety facts: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system, early edition. Technical report, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
2. E. Dickmanns and B. Mysliwetz. Recursive 3-D road and relative ego-state recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2):199-213, 1992.
3. D. E. Goldberg and J. Richardson. Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 148-154, 1987.
4. F. Gruau, D. Whitley, and L. Pyeatt. A comparison between cellular encoding and direct encoding for genetic neural networks. In J. R. Koza, D. E. Goldberg, D. B. Fogel. and R. L. Riolo, editors, Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, pages 81-89. MIT Press, 1996.
5. M. Haag and H.-H. Nagel. Combination of edge element and optical flow estimates for 3d-model-based vehicle tracking in traffic image sequences. International Journal of Computer Vision, 35(3):295-319, 1999.
6. N. J. Radcliffe. Genetic set recombination and its application to neural network topology optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 1(1):67-90, 1993.
7. K. Stanley, N. Kohl, R. Sherony, and R. Miikkulainen. Neuroevolution of an automobile crash warning system. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2005, pages 1977-1984, 2005.
8. K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen. Efficient reinforcement learning through evolving neural network topologies. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2002), 2002.
9. K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary Computation, 10(2), 2002.
10. K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen. Competitive coevolution through evolutionary complexification. 21:63-100, 2004.
11. F. Thomanek, E. D. Dickmanns, and D. Dickmanns. Multiple object recognition and scene interpretation for autonomous road vehicle guidance. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 1994.
12. S. Whiteson, P. Stone, K. O. Stanley, R. Miikkulainen, and N. Kohl. Automatic feature selection in neuroevolution. In GECCO 2005: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 1225-1232, June 2005.
13. X. Yao. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(9):1423-1447, 1999.