Noise-induced vocal modulation in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

American Journal of Primatology

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1183-1190

  Egnor, S E Roian ^a,b   Hauser, Marc D ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Lombard effect; Primate; Vocal control

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE; AUDITORY CUE; NOISE; PRIMATE; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMAL; ANTHROPOIDEA; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEAD; MALE; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SPEECH; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; HEAD; MALE; NOISE; SAGUINUS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; PRIMATES; SAGUINUS OEDIPUS; SIMIIFORMES;

EID: 33750221958     PISSN: 02752565     EISSN: 10982345     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20317     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brumm H, Todt D. 2002. Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63:891-897.
2. Brumm H, Voss K, Koeller I, Todt D. 2004. Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol 207:443-448.
3. Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Behav 35:151-209.
4. Cleveland J, Snowdon CT. 1982. The complex vocal repertoire of the adult cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus). Z Tierpsychol 58:231-270.
5. Cynx J, Lewis R, Tavel B, Tse H. 1998. Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 56:107-113.
6. Doupe AJ, Kuhl PK. 1999. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:567-631.
7. Foote AD, Osborne RW, Hoelzel AR. 2004. Whale-call response to masking boat noise. Nature 428:910.
8. Foster S. 1986. Impulse response measurements using Golay codes. Tokyo. p 929-932.
9. Garcia-Rutledge EJ, Narins PM. 2001. Shared acoustic resources in an Old World frog community. Herpetologica 57:104-116.
10. Golay M. 1961. Complementary series. IRE Trans Inform Theory 7:82-87.
11. Janik VM, Slater PJB. 2000. The different roles of social learning in vocal communication. Anim Behav 60:1-11.
12. Lane H, Tranel B. 1971. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J Speech Hearing Sci 14:677-709.
13. Lengagne T, Aubin T, Lauga J, Jouventin P. 1999. How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions? Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 266:1623-1628.
14. Leonardo A. 2004. Experimental test of the birdsong error-correction model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16935-16940.
15. Lombard E. 1911. Le signe de l'elevation de la voix. Ann Malad L'Oreille Larynx 37:101-119.
16. Manabe K, Sadr EI, Dooling RJ. 1998. Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1190-1198.
17. Miller CT, Flusberg S, Hauser MD. 2003. Interruptibility of long call production in tamarins: implications for vocal control. J Exp Biol 206:2629-2639.
18. Nelson B. 2000. Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue. Anim Behav 59:57-67.
19. Nonaka S, Takahashi R, Enomoto K, Katada A, Unno T. 1997. Lombard reflex during PAG-induced vocalizations in decerebrate cats. Neurosci Res 29:283-289.
20. Picheny MA, Durlach NI, Braida LD. 1986. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hearing Res 29:434-446.
21. Potash LM. 1972a. Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail. Psychonomic Sci 26:252-254.
22. Potash LM. 1972b. A signal detection problem and possible solution in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Anim Behav 20:192-195.
23. Rendall D. 2003. Acoustic correlates of caller identity and affect intensity in the vowel-like grunt vocalizations of baboons. J Acoust Soc Am 113:3390-3402.
24. Scheifele PM, Andrew S, Cooper RA, Darre M, Musiek FE, Max L. 2005. Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River beluga. J Acoust Soc Am 117:1486-1492.
25. Sinnott JM, Stebbins WC, Moody DB. 1975. Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey. J Acoust Soc Am 58:412-414.
26. Traunmüller H, Eriksson A. 2000. Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. J Acoust Soc Am 107:3438-3451.
27. Van Summers W, Pisoni DB, Bernacki RH, Pedlow RI, Stokes MA. 1988. Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses. J Acoust Soc Am 84:917-928.
28. Zhou B, Green DM, Middlebrooks JC. 1992. Characterization of external ear impulse responses using Golay codes. J Acoust Soc Am 92:1169-1171.