Surface-roughness design values for modern pipes

SPE Drilling and Completion

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 212-215

  Farshad, Fred F ^a   Rieke, H H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; FRICTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRESSURE DROP; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

FRICTION-PRESSURE LOSSES; INTERNAL FINISHES; RELATIVE ROUGHNESS;

PETROLEUM PIPELINES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; FRICTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PETROLEUM PIPELINES; PRESSURE DROP; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

DESIGN; FLUID PRESSURE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OIL PIPELINE; PIPE; PRESSURE DROP; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 33750218705     PISSN: 10646671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/89040-pa     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arnold, K. and Stewart M. 1986. Surface Production Operations. 1: 414. Houston: Gulf Publication Co.
2. ASME. 1999. Surface Engineering, In ASME Handbook, 5: 969. ASME
3. Brown, K.E. 1984. The Technology of Artificial Methods. 4: 447. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Penn Well Publishing Co.
4. Colebrook, C.F. 1938. J. Inst. Civil Engineers 11: 133.
5. Craig, B.D. 1993. Practical Oilfield Metallurgy and Corrosion. 2: 270. Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell Book Co.
6. DIN 4768/1. 1987. Determination of Surface Roughness of Parameters Ra, Rz, and Rmax by means of Electrical Stylus Instruments. Berlin: Deutsche Inst fuer Normung e.V.
7. Economides, M.J., Hill, D.A., and Ehlig-Economides, C. 1994. Petroleum Production Systems. 611. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
8. Farshad, F.F. and Pesacreta, T.C. 2003. Coated Pipe Interior Surface Roughness as Measured by Three Scanning Probe Instruments. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials 50 (1): 6-16.
9. Farshad, F.F. and Rieke, H.H. 2005. Technology Innovation for Determining Surface Roughness in Pipes. JPT 57 (10): 82-85. SPE-79123-PA.
10. 2. SPEPF 15 (3): 183-190. SPE-65070-PA.
11. Farshad, F.F., Rieke, H.H., and Gandy, J. 2002. Flow Test Validation of Direct Measurement Methods Used to Determine Surface Roughness in Pipes (OCTG). Paper SPE 76768 presented at the SPE Western Regional/AAPG Pacific Section Joint Meeting, Anchorage, 20-22 May.
12. Farshad, F.F., Rieke, H.H., and Garber, J.D. 2001. New Developments in Surface Roughness Measurements, Characterization, and Modeling Fluid Flow in Pipe. J. of Petroleum Science and Engineering 29 (2): 139-150.
13. Geankoplis, C.J. 2003. Transport Processes and Unit Operations. 3: 87. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
14. Moody, L.F. 1944. Friction Factors for Pipe Flow. Trans. of the ASME 66 (8): 671-684.
15. Nikuradse, J. 1933. Strömungagesetze in Rauhen Rohren. In V.D.I. Froschungsheft. 361: 1.
16. Pigott, R.J.S. 1933. The Flow of Fluids in Closed Conduits. In Mechanical Engineering. 55: 497.
17. Szilas, A.P. 1975. Production and Transport of Oil and Gas. 360. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publication.