Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Retrospective study of 45 consecutive adult cases;La résection de jonction pyélo-urétérale par laparoscopie rétropéritonéale: Étude rétrospective de 45 cas consécutifs chez l'adulte

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 439-444

  Moalic, Ronan ^a,b   Pacheco, Philippe ^a   Pages, Arnaud ^a   Lorin, Stéphane ^a   Lacroix, Bertrand ^a   Tostain, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

^b Service d'Urologie   (France)

Author keywords

K ss Anderson Hynes; Laparoscopy; Lumboscopy; Pyeloplasty; Retroperitoneal laparoscopy; Ureteropelvic junction syndrome

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROPERITONEUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYNDROME; URETER DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SYNDROME; URETERAL DISEASES;

EID: 33750218231     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. NGUYEN D.H., ALIABADI H., ERCOLE C.: Junction obstruction in 60 patients. J. Urol., 1989; 142: 704-706.
2. O'REILLY P.H., BROOMAN P.J., MAK S., JONES M., PICKUP C., ATKINSON C., et al.: The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int., 2001; 87: 287-289.
3. GRAVERSEN H.P., TOFTE T., GENSTER H.G.: Uretero-pelvic stenosis. Int. Urol. Nephrol., 1987; 19: 245-251.
4. DOMINGUEZ BRAVO C., SOLER FERNANDEZ J.M., ASUAR AYDILLO S., GOMEZ DE TEJADA R., HERRERA PUERTO J.: Anderson-Hynes: results of the treatment of pyeloureteral junction syndrome. Actas Urol. Esp., 1990; 14: 115-120.
5. KLINGLER H.C., REMZI M., JANETSCHEK G., KRATZIK C., MARBERGER M.J.: Comparison of Open contre Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Techniques in Treatment of Uretero-Pelvic Junction Obstruction. Eur. Urol. 2003; 44: 340-345.
6. CLARK W.R., MALEK R.S.: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction. I. Observations on the classic type in adults. J. Urol., 1987; 138: 276-279.
7. CHERRIE R.J., KAUFMAN J.J.: Pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults: correlation of radiographic and clinical results. J. Urol., 1983; 129: 711-714.
8. SCHUESSLER W.W., GRUNE M.T., TECUANHUEY L.V., PREMINGER G.M.: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J. Urol., 1993; 150: 1795-1799.
9. KAVOUSSI L.R., PETERS C.A.: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J. Urol., 1993; 150: 1891-1894.
10. JARRETT T.W., CHAN D.Y., CHARAMBURA T.C., FUGITA O., KAVOUSSI L.R.: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J. Urol. 2002; 167: 1253-1256.
11. TURK I.A., DAVIS J.W., WINKELMANN B., DEGER S., RICHTER F., FABRIZIO M.D., et al.: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur. Urol., 2002; 42: 268-275.
12. EDEN C.G., CAHILL D., ALLEN J.D.: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int., 2001; 88: 526-531.
13. SOULIE M., SALOMON L., PATARD J.J., MOULY P., MANUNTA A., ANTIPHON P., et al.: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J. Urol. 2001; 166: 48-50.
14. LACHKAR A., SIBERT L., ROZET F., BUGEL H., PFISTER C., GRISE P.: Apport de la lomboscopie dans le traitement des syndromes de la jonction pyélourétérale. A propos de 25 cas. Prog. Urol., 2000; 10: 524-528.
15. Laparoscopie en urologie. Rapport du congrès 1999 de l'Association Française d'Urologie. Prog. Urol., 1999; 9: 841-1000.
16. BAUER J.J., BISHOFF J.T., MOORE R.G., CHEN R.N., IVERSON A.J., KAVOUSSI L.R.: Laparoscopic contre open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J. Urol., 1999; 162: 692-695.
17. BROOKS J.D., KAVOUSSI L.R., PREMINGER G.M., SCHUESSLER W.W., MOORE R.G.: Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology, 1995; 46: 791-795.
18. RAVIV G., LEIBOVITCH I., SHENFELD O., MOR Y., JONAS P., GOLDWASSER B.: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: relation of etiology and age at surgical repair to clinical outcome. Urol. Int., 1994; 52: 135-139.
19. WOLF J.S. JR., MONK T.G., MCDOUGALL E.M., MCCLENNAN B.L., CLAYMAN R.V.: The extraperitoneal approach and subcutaneous emphysema are associated with greater absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopic renal surgery. J. Urol., 1995; 154: 959-963.
20. FITZGERALD T.B., JOHNSTONE N.W.: Diaphragmatic defects and laparoscopy. Br. Med. J., 1970; 2: 604.
21. NG C.S., GILL I.S., SUNG G.T., WHALLEY D.G., GRAHAM R., SCHWEIZER D.: Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is not associated with increased carbon dioxide absorption. J. Urol., 1999; 162: 1268-1272.
22. VAN CANGH P.J., NESA S.: Endopyelotomy. Prognostic factors and patient selection. Urol. Clin. North Am., 1998; 25: 281-288.
23. LECHEVALLIER E., EGHAZARIAN C., ORTEGA J.C., ANDRE M., GELSI E., COULANGE C.: Retrograde Acucise endopyelotomy: long-term results. J. Endourol., 1999; 13: 575-578.
24. CUZIN B., ABBAR M., DAWAHRA M., VIGUIER J.L., MARTIN X., GELET A.: 100 endopyélotomies percutanées. Technique, indications, résultats. Prog. Urol., 1992; 2: 559-569.
25. VAN CANGH P.J., WILMART J.F., OPSOMER R.J., ABI-AAD A., WESE F.X., LORGE F.: Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a critical analysis of prognostic factors. J. Urol., 1994; 151: 934-937.
26. KUNKEL M., KORTH K.: Long-term results following percutaneous pyeloplasty. Urologe A, 1990; 29: 325-329.
27. GUPTA M., SMITH A.D.: Crossing vessels. Endourologic implications. Urol. Clin. North Am., 1998; 25: 289-293.
28. WAGNER J.R., D'AGOSTINO R., BABAYAN R.K.: Renal arterioureteral hemorrhage: a complication of acucise endopyelotomy. Urology, 1996; 48: 139-141.
29. MOTOLA J.A., BADLANI G.H., SMITH A.D.: Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8-year followup. J. Urol., 1993; 149: 453-456.
30. MERETYK I., MERETYK S., CLAYMAN R.V.: Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques. J. Urol., 1992; 148: 775-782.
31. COMBE M., GELET A., ABDELRAHIM A.F., LOPEZ J.G., DAWAHRA M., MARTIN X., et al.: Ureteropelvic invagination procedure for endopyelotomy (Gelet technique): review of 51 consecutive cases. J. Endourol. 1996; 10: 153-157.
32. CASSIS A.N., BRANNEN G.E., BUSH W.H., CORREA R.J., CHAMBERS M.: Endopyelotomy: review of results and complications. J. Urol. 1991; 146: 1492-1495.
33. PARDALIDIS N.P., PAPATSORIS A.G., KOSMAOGLOU E.V.: Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J. Urol., 2002; 168: 1937-1940.
34. EDEN C.G., SULTANA S.R., MURRAY K.H., CARRUTHERS R.K.: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered fibrin-glued pyeloplasty: medium-term results. Br. J. Urol., 1997; 80: 382-389.
35. RASSWEILER J.J., SEEMANN O., FREDE T., HENKEL T.O., ALKEN P.: Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J. Urol., 1998; 160: 1265-1269.
36. JANETSCHEK G., PESCHEL R., ALTARAC S., BARTSCH G.: Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology, 1996; 47: 311-316.
37. THOMAS M.A., RHA K.H., ONG A.M., PINTO P.A., MONTGOMERY R.A., KAVOUSSI L.R., et al.: Optical access trocar injuries in urological laparoscopic surgery. J. Urol., 2003; 170: 61-63.
38. SAINT F., SAINT M.L., LEGEAIS D., LEMAITRE L., BAILLEUL J.P., BISERTE J.: Méthodes diagnostique de l'obstruction de la voie excrétrice supérieure: quels sont les examens disponibles en 2001. Prog. Urol., 2001; 11: 602-609.
39. TOSTAIN J., PERRAUD Y., PREYNAT P.: Resection de la jonction pyélourétérale sans drainage urinaire externe pour sténose urétérale primitive. J. Urol. (Paris), 1991; 97: 203-206.