Perturbation of auditory feedback causes systematic perturbation in vocal structure in adult cotton-top tamarins

Journal of Experimental Biology

Volumn 209, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 3652-3663

  Egnor, S E Roian ^a   Iguina, Carmen G ^a   Hauser, Marc D ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Lombard effect; Monkey; Nonhuman primate; Vocal production

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL; ANTHROPOIDEA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SAGUINUS; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SAGUINUS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; PRIMATES; SAGUINUS OEDIPUS; SIMIIFORMES;

EID: 33750210489     PISSN: 00220949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02420     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Brumm, H. and Todt, D. (2002). Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim. Behav. 63, 891-897.
2. Brumm, H., Voss, K., Koeller, I. and Todt, D. (2004). Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 443-448.
3. Cynx, J. (1990). Experimental determination of a unit of song production in the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Comp. Psychol. 104, 3-10.
4. Cynx, J. and von Rad, U. (2001). Immediate and transitory effects of delayed auditory feedback on bird song production. Anim. Behav. 62, 305-312.
5. Cynx, J., Lewis, R., Tavel, B. and Tse, H. (1998). Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim. Behav. 56, 107-113.
6. Donath, T. M., Natke, U. and Kalveram, K. T. (2002). Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 357-366.
7. Egnor, S. E. R. and Hauser, M. D. (2004). A paradox in the evolution of primate vocal learning. Trends Neurosci. 27, 649-654.
8. Egnor, S. E. R. and Hauser, M. D. (2006). Noise-induced vocal modulation in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Am. J. Primatol. In Press.
9. Fischer, J., Hammerschmidt, K. and Todt, D. (1998). Local variation in Barbary macaque shrill barks. Anim. Behav. 56, 623-629.
10. Foote, A. D., Osborne, R. W. and Hoelzel, A. R. (2004). Whale-call response to masking boat noise. Nature 428, 910.
11. Fricke, J. (1970). Syllabic duration and the Lombard effect. Int. Audio. 9, 53-57.
12. Gouzoules, H. and Gouzoules, S. (1990). Matrilineal signatures in the recruitment screams of pigtail macaques, Macaca nemestrina. Behaviour 115, 327-347.
13. Hammerschmidt, K., Freudenstein, T. and Juergens, U. (2001). Vocal development in squirrel monkeys. Behaviour 138, 1179-1204.
14. Heymann, J. and Bergmann, H.-H. (1988). Incomplete song strophes in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs L.: general influences on a specific behavioural output. Bioacoustics 1, 25-30.
15. Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Houde, J. F. and Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279, 1213-1216.
17. Hultsch, H. and Todt, D. (1982). Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 253-260.
18. Janik, V. M. and Slater, P. J. B. (2000). The different roles of social learning in vocal communication. Anim. Behav. 60, 1-11.
19. Jones, B. S., Harris, D. H. R. and Catchpole, C. K. (1993). The stability of the vocal signature phee calls of the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. Am. J. Primatol. 31, 67-75.
20. Jones, J. J. and Munhall, K. G. (2000). Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1246-1251.
21. Jorgensen, D. D. and French, J. A. (1998). Individuality but not stability in marmoset long calls. Ethology 104, 729-742.
22. Konishi, M. (1965). The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Z. Tierpsychol. 22, 770-783.
23. Lee, B. S. (1950). Effects of delayed feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 824-826.
24. Lengagne, T., Aubin, T., Lauga, J. and Jouventin, P. (1999). How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266, 1623-1628.
25. Leonardo, A. (2004). Experimental test of the birdsong error-correction model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16935-16940.
26. Leonardo, A. and Konishi, M. (1999). Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback. Nature 399, 466-470.
27. Lieblich, A. K., Symmes, D., Newman, J. D. and Shapiro, M. (1980). Development of isolation peep in laboratory-bred squirrel monkeys. Anim. Behav. 28, 1-9.
28. Lombard, E. (1911). Le signe de l'elevation de la voix. Ann. Maladies Oreille Larynx Nez Pharynx 37, 101-119.
29. Maxwell, S. E. (1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in repeated measures designs. J. Educ. Stat. 5, 269-287.
30. Miller, C. T., Flusberg, S. and Hauser, M. D. (2003). Interruptibility of long call production in tamarins: implications for vocal control. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 2629-2639.
31. Mitani, J. C., Hasegawa, T., Gros-Louis, J., Marler, P. and Byrne, R. (1992). Dialects in wild chimpanzees? Am. J. Primatol. 27, 233-244.
32. Nonaka, S., Takahashi, R., Enomoto, K., Katada, A. and Unno, T. (1997). Lombard reflex during PAG-induced vocalizations in decerebrate cats. Neurosci. Res. 29, 283-289.
33. Nordeen, K. W. and Nordeen, E. J. (1992). Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav. Neural Biol. 57, 58-66.
34. Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I. and Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. J. Speech Hear. Res. 29, 434-446.
35. Potash, L. M. (1972a). Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail. Psychon. Sci. 26, 252-254.
36. Potash, L. M. (1972b). A signal detection problem and possible solution in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Anim. Behav. 20, 192-195.
37. Riebel, K. and Todt, D. (1997). Light flash stimulation alters the nightingale's singing style: implications for song control mechanisms. Behaviour 134, 789-808.
38. Rivers, C. and Rastatter, M. P. (1985). The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults. J. Aud. Res. 25, 37-45.
39. Scheifele, P. M., Andrew, S., Cooper, R. A., Darre, M., Musiek, F. E. and Max, L. (2005). Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River beluga. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1486-1492.
40. Sinnott, J. M., Stebbins, W. C. and Moody, D. B. (1975). Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58, 412-414.
41. Talmage-Riggs, G., Winter, P., Ploog, D. and Mayer, W. (1972). Effect of deafening on the vocal behavior of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Folia Primatol. 17, 404-420.
42. ten Cate, C. and Ballintijn, M. R. (1996). Dove coos and flashed lights: interruptibility of 'song' in a nonsongbird. J. Comp. Psychol. 110, 267-275.
43. Van Summers, W., Pisoni, D. B., Bernacki, R. H., Pedlow, R. I. and Stokes, M. A. (1988). Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 917-928.
44. Villacorta, V., Perkell, J. and Guenther, F. (2004). Sensorimotor adaptation to acoustic perturbation in vowel formants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2430.
45. Waldstein, R. S. (1990). Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 2099-2114.
46. Winter, P., Handley, P., Ploog, D. and Schott, D. (1973). Ontogeny of squirrel monkey calls under normal conditions and under acoustic isolation. Behavior 47, 230-239.