Archaeology and theoretical culture

Archaeological Dialogues

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 167-182

  Johnson, Matthew H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; CULTURE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 33750191805     PISSN: 13802038     EISSN: 14782294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1380203806292080     Document Type: Article

References (227)

1. Ankersmit, F.R., 2001: Historical representation, Stanford, CA.
2. Andersson, D.T., 2001: Tingenes taushet, tingenes tale, Oslo.
3. Baker, F., and Thomas, J. (eds), 1990: Writing the past in the present, Lampeter, St David's University College.
4. Banning, E.B., 1993: Hypermedia and archaeological publication. The Wadi Ziqlab Project, in J. Andresen, T. Madsen and I. Scollar (eds), Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology, Århus, 441-47.
5. Bapty, I., and T. Yates (eds), 1990: Archaeology after structuralism. Poststructuralism and the practice of archaeology, London.
6. Barkan, L., 1999: Unearthing the past. Archaeology and aesthetics in the making of Renaissance culture, New Haven.
7. Barrett, J., 2000: A thesis on agency, in M.-A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds), Agency in archaeology, London, 61-68.
8. Barrett, J.C., 2005: Material culture, humanity and the beginnings of the Neolithic, in T.L. Kienlin (ed.), Die Dinge als Zeichen. Kulturelles Wissen und materielle Kultur. Internationale Fachtagung an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main 3.-5. April 2003, Bonn (Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 127), 111-24.
9. Bate, J., 2000: The song of the Earth, Cambridge, MA.
10. Bell, J., 1994: Reconstructing prehistory. Scientific method in archaeology, Philadelphia.
11. Benson, L., K. Peterson and J. Stein, 2006: Anasazi (pre-columbian Native-American) migrations during the middle-12th and late-13th centuries - were they drought induced?, Climatic change, May, 1-27.
12. Benson, O., and J. Stangroom, 2006: Why truth matters, London.
13. Berggren, Å., and M. Burström (eds), 2002: Reflexiv fältarkeologi?, Malmö.
14. Berggren, Å., and I. Hodder, 2003: Social practice, method, and some problems of field archaeology, American antiquity 68, 421-34.
15. Binford, L.R., 1983: In pursuit of the past, London.
16. Blanckaert, C., A. Ducros and J.-J. Hublin (eds), 1990: Histoire de l'anthropologie. Hommes, idées, moments. Actes du colloque organisé par la Société d'anthropologie de Paris, les 16 et 17 juin 1989, Rouen.
17. Bodin, J., 1969: Method for the easy comprehension of history (tr. B. Reynolds), New York.
18. Borake, T., and A. Beck, 2006: Refleksiv feltpraksis - praktisk talt, Arkælogisk Forum 14, 19-24.
19. Bourdieu, P., 1977: Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge.
20. Bourdieu, P., 1984: Homo academicus, Paris.
21. Bourdieu, P., 1996: The state nobility, Oxford.
22. Bradley, R., 1993: Archaeology. The loss of nerve, in N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt (ed.), Archaeological theory. Who sets the agenda? Cambridge.
23. Bradley, R., 2000: An archaeology of natural places, London.
24. Bradley, R., 2003: Seeing things. Perception, experience and the constraints of excavation, Journal of social archaeology 3, 151-68.
25. Brück, J., 2005: Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory, Archaeological dialogues 12, 45-72.
26. Brumfiel, E., 1992: Distinguished lecture in archaeology. Breaking and entering the ecosystem - gender, class and faction steal the show, American anthropologist 94, 551-67.
27. Bruner, J., 1986: Actual minds, possible worlds, Cambridge.
28. Bruns, G.L., 1989: Heidegger's enstrangements. Language, truth, and poetry in the later writings, New Haven.
29. Bruns, G.L., 1995: Hermeneutics ancient and modern, New Haven.
30. Carlyle, T., 1973: On heroes, hero-worship, and the heroic in history, in F. Stern (ed.), The varieties of history, New York, 90-107.
31. Cavell, S., 1988: Text of recovery (Coleridge, Wordsworth, Heidegger ...), in S. Cavell, In quest of the ordinary, Chicago, 50-75.
32. Chadwick, A., 2003: Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflective and radical practice, Archaeological dialogues 10, 97-117.
33. Clark, G., 1977: World prehistory in new perspective, 3rd edn, Cambridge.
34. Clarke, D., 1972: Analytical archaeology, London.
35. Cohen, C., and J.-J. Hublin, 1989: Boucher de Perthes. Les origines romantiques de la préhistoire, Paris and Belin.
36. Collingwood, R.G., 1939: An autobiography, Oxford.
37. Collingwood, R.G., 1946: The idea of history, Oxford.
38. Conkey, Meg, 2006: Dwelling at the margins, action at the intersection? Feminist and indigenous archaeologies, 2005, Archaeologies 1, 9-59.
39. Corcos, N., 2001: Churches as prehistoric ritual monuments. A phenomenological perspective from Somerset. Artefact 6. Available at http://www.shef.ac.uk/assem/issue6/Corcos_web.html.
40. Coudart, A., 1994a: Using the dwelling to study culture, in Value in tradition. The utility of research on identity and sustainability in dwellings and settlements, Berkeley, IASTE Working paper series (Methods of traditional-environment research) 62, 35-50.
41. Coudart, A., 1994b: Maisons néolithiques, maisons de Nouvelle-Guinée. L'ethnologie comparée du choix social et technique, in B. Latour and P. Lemonnier (eds), De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques. L'intelligence sociale des techniques, Paris, 228-52.
42. Cowgill, G., 1993: Distinguished lecture in anthropology. Beyond criticizing new archaeology, American anthropologist 95, 551-73.
43. Crawford, O.G.S., 1928: Wessex from the air, Oxford.
44. Crawford, O.G.S., 1953: Archaeology in the field, London.
45. Culler, J., 1997: Literary theory. A very short introduction, Oxford.
46. Cutler, Alan, 2003: Seashells on the mountain top, New York.
47. Descola, Ph., 1996a: Constructing nature. Symbolic ecology and social practice, in Ph. Descola and G. Palsson (eds), Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives, London and New York (European Association of Social Anthropologists), 82-102.
48. Descola, Ph., 1996b: Les cosmologies des Indiens d'Amazonie, La recherche 1108, 62-67.
49. Descola, Ph., 2003: Nature/culture. Un paradigme à relativiser, in S. Cospérec and J.-J. Rosat (eds), Les connaissances et la pensée. Quelle place faire aux savoirs dans l'enseignement de la philosophie?, Rosny, 37-63.
50. Descola, Ph., 2005: Par de-là nature et culture, Paris (Bibliothèque des sciences humaines).
51. Dobres, M.-A., and J. Robb (eds), 2000: Agency in archaeology, London.
52. Dommasnes, L.H., 1990: Feminist archaeology. Critique or theory building?, in F. Baker and J. Thomas (eds), Writing the past in the present, Lampeter, 24-31.
53. Eagleton, T., 1983: Literary theory. An introduction, Oxford.
54. Easthope, A., 1999: Englishness and national culture, London.
55. Ebeling, K., and S. Altekamp (eds), 2004: Die Aktualität des Archäologischen, Frankfurt am Main.
56. Edmonds, M., 1999: Ancestral geographies of the neolithic, London.
57. Embree, L. (ed.), 1992: Metaarchaeology. Reflections by archaeologists and philosophers, Dordrecht.
58. Embree, L. (gen. ed.), 1997: Encyclopedia of phenomenology, Dordrecht.
59. Engelstad, E., 1991: Images of power and contradiction. Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology, Antiquity 65, 502-14.
60. Fagan, Brian, 1995: Ancient North America. The archaeology of a continent, 2nd edn, New York.
61. Fagan, Brian, 2001: In the beginning. An introduction to archaeology, 10th edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
62. Fagan, Brian, 2004: People of the Earth. An introduction to world prehistory, 11th edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
63. Feder, Kenneth L., 2004: Linking to the past. A brief introduction to archaeology, New York.
64. Feder, Kenneth L., 2007: The past in perspective. An introduction to human prehistory, 4th edn, Boston.
65. Flannery, K.V., 1976: The early Mesoamerican village, New York.
66. Fleming, A., 2005: Megaliths and post-modernism. The case of Wales, Antiquity 79, 921-32.
67. Foucault, M., 1989: Archaeology of knowledge, London.
68. Fuller, S., 2000: Thomas Kuhn. A philosophical history for our times, Chicago.
69. Gadamer, H.-G., 1976: Philosophical hermeneutics, Los Angeles.
70. Gadamer, H.-G., 1989: Truth and method (English tr.), London.
71. Gardin, J.-C., 1980: Archaeological constructs, Cambridge.
72. Gardin, J.-C., 1996: Cognitive issues in archaeology, Archaeologia Polona 34, 205-32.
73. Gardin, J.-C., 2000: Modèles et recits, in J.-M. Berthelot (ed.), L'épistémologie des sciences sociales, Paris, 407-54.
74. Gardner, A. (ed.), 2004: Agency uncovered. Archaeological perspectives on social agency, power and being human, London.
75. Gell, A., 1998: Art and agency, Oxford.
76. Gero, J., 1985: Socio-politics of archaeology and the woman-at-home ideology, American antiquity 50, 342-50.
77. Gero, J., 1994: Gender division of labor in the construction of archaeological knowledge in the United States, in G.C. Bond and A. Gilliam (eds), Social construction of the past. Representation as power, New York, 144-53.
78. Gero, J., 1996: Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data, in R. Wright (ed.), Gender and archaeology, Philadelphia, 251-80.
79. Gero, J.M., 2000: Troubled travels in agency and feminism, in M.-A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds), Agency in archaeology, London, 34-39.
80. Giddens, A., 1984: The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge.
81. Gilchrist, R., 1991: Women's archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision, Antiquity 65, 495-501.
82. Godelier, M., 2005: Breaking the mirror of the self. Is social anthropology indissolubly linked with the West, its birthplace?, Lecture delivered on 8 November 2005 at Arizona State University on the occasion of the launch of the new School of Human Evolution and Social Change, available at http://www.asu.edu/clas/shesc/news/godelier.htm.
83. Gosden, C., 1994: Social being and time, Oxford.
84. Gould, S.J., 1989: Wonderful life. The Burgess Shale and the nature of history, New York.
85. Hamilakis, Y., 1999: La trahison des archéologues? Archaeological practice as intellectual activity in postmodernity, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 12, 60-79.
86. Haraway, D., 1988: Situated knowledges. The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, Feminist studies 14, 575-99.
87. Hegel, G.W.F., 1956: The philosophy of history, New York.
88. Hegmon, M., 2003: Setting theoretical egos aside. Issues and theory in North American archaeology, American antiquity 68, 213-43.
89. Heidegger, M., 1953: Sein und Zeit, Tübingen.
90. Heidegger, M., 1962: Being and Time, New York.
91. Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr and H. Gintis, 2004: Foundations of human sociality, Oxford.
92. Héritier, F., 1996: Masculin/Féminin. La pensée de la différence, Paris.
93. Hodder, I., 1991: Reading the past, Cambridge.
94. Hodder, I., 1997: Always momentary, fluid and flexible. Towards a reflexive excavation methodology, Antiquity 71, 691-700.
95. Hodder, I., 1999: The archaeological process. An introduction, Oxford.
96. Hodder, I. (ed.), 2000: Towards a reflexive method in archaeology. The example at Çatalhöyük, Cambridge (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph No. 28).
97. Hodder, I., and Hutson, S., 2003: Reading the past. Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, 3rd edn, Cambridge.
98. Holt, Rush D., 2006: Keynote introduction. Paper given at the Fourteenth Cosmos Club Spring Symposium, "Science in America's future." Cosmos Club, Washington, DC, 1 April 2006. Notes taken by the author.
99. Holtorf, C., 2000-1: Monumental past. The life-histories of megalithic monuments in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). Electronic monograph, University of Toronto at Scarborough, available at http://cidtpress.utsc.utoronto.ca/holtorf.
100. Huggett, J., 1995: Democracy, data and archaeological knowledge, in J. Huggett and N. Ryan (eds), Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology, Oxford (British Archaeological Reports, International Series 600), 23-26.
101. Hughes, T.P., 1983: Networks of power, Baltimore.
102. Jensen, C.K., 2005: Refleksiv feltarkæologi. Postprocessuell arkæologi i praksis, Arkæologisk Forum 12, 13-16.
103. Johnson, M.H., 1989: Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation, Journal of anthropological archaeology 8, 189-211.
104. Johnson, M.H., 1999: Archaeological theory. An introduction, Oxford.
105. Johnson, M.H., 2000: Self-made men and the staging of agency, in M.-A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds), Agency in archaeology, London, 213-31.
106. Johnson, M.H., 2002: Behind the castle gate. From medieval to Renaissance, London.
107. Johnson, M.H., 2004: Agency, structure and archaeological practice, in A. Gardner (ed.), Agency uncovered. Archaeological perspectives on social agency, power and being human, London, 241-48.
108. Johnson 2006.
109. Johnson, M.H., 2007: Ideas of landscape, Oxford.
110. Jones, A., 2003: Archaeological theory and scientific practice, Cambridge.
111. Kant, I., 1963: Idea for a universal history from a cosmopolitan point of view, in L.W. Beck (ed.), On history, New York, 11-26.
112. Kohl, P., 2004: Comments on Adam T. Smith's 'The end of the essential archaeological subject', Archaeological dialogues 11, 20-21.
113. Kristiansen, K., 2004: Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology, Archaeological dialogues 11, 77-98.
114. Kristiansen, K., and M. Rowlands (eds), 1998: Social transformations in archaeology. Global and local perspectives, London.
115. Lampeter Archaeology Workshop, 1997: Relativism, objectivity and the politics of the past, Archaeological dialogues 2, 164-98.
116. Larsen, J.E., B. Olsen, A. Hesjedal and I. Storli, 1993: Camera archaeologica. Rapport fra et feltarbeid, Tromsø.
117. Latour, B., 1987: Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Cambridge, MA.
118. Latour, B., 1993: We have never been modern, New York.
119. Latour, B., 1994: Pragmatogonies ... A mythical account of how humans and non-humans swap properties, in M. Ashmore (ed.), Humans and others. The concept of 'agency' and its attribution, special issue of American Behavioral Sciences 37, 791-808.
120. Latour, B., 1996: On interobjectivity, An international journal (the lessons of simian societies), available at http://www.ensmp.fr/~latour/ articles/article/063.html.
121. Latour, B., 1999: Pandora's hope. Essays on the reality of science studies, Cambridge, MA.
122. Latour, B., 2000: The Berlin key or how to do words with things, in P.M. Graves-Brown (ed.), Matter, materiality and modern culture, London, 10-21.
123. Latour, B., 2002: Le rappel de la modernité. Approches anthropologiques, ethnographiques.org (online), 6 November 2002, available at http://www.ethnographiques.org/documents/article/ arArLatour.html.
124. Latour, B., 2004: Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern, Critical inquiry 30(2), special issue on the future of critique, 25-48, available at http://www.ensmp.fr/~latour/ articles/article/089.html.
125. Latour, B., 2005: Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory, Oxford.
126. Latour, B., and S. Woolgar, 1986: Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts, Princeton, NJ.
127. Lekson, S., 1984: Great Pueblo architecture of Chaco Canyon, Santa Fe.
128. Leone, M., 1971: Review of New perspectives in archaeology, ed. S.R. Binford and L.R. Binford, American antiquity 36, 220.
129. Leone, M.P. (ed.), 1972: Contemporary archaeology, Carbondale.
130. Leone, M.P. n.d.: Walter Taylor and the production of anger in American archaeology, unpublished paper available as pdf at http://www.bsos.umd.edu/anth/faculty/mleone/index.html.
131. Lepenies, W., 1988: Between literature and science. The rise of sociology, Cambridge.
132. Lermontov, M., 2004 [1840]: A hero of our time (tr. M. Schwartz), New York.
133. Lippert, D., 2006: Comment on Conkey, M., 'Dwelling at the margins, action at the inersection? Feminist and indigenous archaeologies, 2005', Archaeologies. Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 1, 67-70.
134. Lucas, G., 2001: Critical approaches to fieldwork. Contemporary and historical archaeological practice, London.
135. Lutz, C., 1995: The gender of theory, in R. Behar and D. Gordon (eds), Women writing culture, Berkeley, 249-66.
136. McGann, J., 1984: The Romantic ideology. A critical investigation, Chicago.
137. Marchand, S.L., 1996: Down from Olympus. Archaeology and philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970. Princeton, NJ.
138. Maschner, H.D.G. (ed.), 1996: Darwinian archaeologies, New York.
139. Meltzer, D., 1985: North American archeology and archeologists, 1879-1934, American antiquity 50, 249-60.
140. Merleau-Ponty, M., 1968: The visible and the invisible, Evanston, IL.
141. Meskell, L., 2004: Object worlds in ancient Egypt. Material biographies past and present, Oxford.
142. Mikailov, Anar, 2006: Nicolaus Steno. A man ahead of his time, term paper for ANTH4480, ECON314 and HONR328R: Italy. Culture, heritage, and economy.
143. Miller, D. (ed.), 1998: Material cultures. Why some things matter, Chicago.
144. Miller, D., M. Rowlands and C. Tilley (eds), 1989: Domination and resistance, London.
145. Milne, C., and P. Crabtree, 2001: Prostitutes, a rabbi, and a carpenter - dinner at the Five Points in the 1830s, Historical archaeology 5(3), 31-48.
146. Momigliano, A., 1990: The classical foundations of modern historiography, Berkeley.
147. Moore, H., 1985: Space, text and gender. An anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya, Cambridge.
148. Moore, H.L., 2000: Ethics and ontology. Why agents and agency matter, in M.-A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds), Agency in archaeology, London, 259-63.
149. Moss, M., 2005: Rifts in the theoretical landscape of archaeology in the United States. A comment on Hegmon and Watkins, American antiquity 70, 581-87.
150. N.A., 27 January 2005: Nocolaus Steno, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Embassy of Denmark, Washington, DC, available at http://www.ambwashington.um.dk/en/menu/informationaboutdenmark/ educationandtraining/famousdanishscientists/nicolaussteno.htm. Accessed 7 March 2006.
151. Plog, S., 1986: Patterns of demographic growth and decline, in S. Plog (ed.), Spatial organization and exchange. Archaeological survey on northern Black Mesa, Carbondale, 224-55.
152. Plog, S., 1990: Sociopolitical implications of Southwestern stylistic variation, in M. Conkey and C. Hastorf (eds), The uses of style in archaeology, New York, 61-72.
153. Plog, S., and J.L. Hantman, 1991: Chronology construction and the study of prehistoric culture change, Journal of field archaeology 17, 439-56.
154. Pollard, J., and A. Reynolds, 2002: Avebury. The biography of a landscape, Stroud.
155. Popper, K., 1972: Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach, London.
156. Renfrew, A.C., 1982: Towards an archaeology of mind, Cambridge.
157. Renfrew, A.C., 2003: Figuring it out. Who are we? And where do we come from? The parallel visions of artists and archaeologists, London.
158. Renfrew, A.C., and P. Bahn (eds), 2004: Archaeology. Theories, methods and practice, London.
159. Renfrew, A.C., and P. Bahn (eds), 2005: Archaeology. The key concepts, London.
160. Richard, N. (ed.), 1993: Histoire de la préhistoire, Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 90.
161. Ricoeur, P., 1984: The reality of the historical past (The Aquinas Lecture, 1984). Milwaukee.
162. Ricoeur, P., 1998: Critique and conviction, New York.
163. Ricoeur, P., 2000: L'écriture de l'histoire et la représentation du passé, Annales HSS, 731-47.
164. Ricoeur, P., 2004: Memory, history, forgetting, Chicago.
165. Robin, C., 2006: Gender, farming, and long-term change. Maya historical and archaeological perspectives, Current anthropology, forthcoming.
166. Robb, J., 2004: Agency. A personal view, Archaeological dialogues 11, 103-6.
167. Sabloff, J., and G. Willey, 1980: A history of American archaeology, New York.
168. Scarre, C., and G. Scarre (eds), 2006: The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice, Cambridge.
169. Schiffer, M.B., 1996: Some relationships between behavioural and evolutionary archaeologies, American antiquity 61, 643-62.
170. Schiffer, M.B., 2000: Social theory in archaeology. Building bridges, in M.B. Schiffer (ed.), Social theory in archaeology, Salt Lake City, 1-14.
171. Schiffer, M. (ed.), 2001: Anthropological perspectives on technology, Albuquerque.
172. Schiffer, M., 2002: Formation processes of the archaeological record, Salt Lake City.
173. Schlanger, N. (ed.), 2002: Ancestral archives. Explorations in the history of archaeology, Antiquity 76 (special issue), 127-238.
174. Schnapp, A., 1997: The discovery of the past, New York.
175. Schwartz, J., 1992: The creative moment. How science made itself alien to modern culture, New York.
176. Shanks, M., 1992: Experiencing the past. On the character of archaeology, London.
177. Shanks, M., and M. Pearson, 2002: Theatre/archaeology. Disciplinary dialogues, London.
178. Shanks, M., and C. Tilley, 1987a: Re-constructing archaeology. Theory and practice, Cambridge.
179. Shanks, M., and C. Tilley, 1987b: Social theory and archaeology, Oxford.
180. Shanks, M., and C. Tilley, 1992: Re-constructing archaeology. Theory and practice, London.
181. Sharer, Robert J., and Wendy Ashmore, 2003: Archaeology. Discovering our past, 3rd edn, Boston.
182. Shennan, S., 2002: Genes, memes and human history. Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution, London.
183. Sillar, W., 2004: Acts of god and active material culture. Agency and commitment in the Andes, in A. Gardner (ed.), Agency uncovered. Archaeological perspectives on social agency, power and being human, London, 153-90.
184. Simon, H., 2001: The sciences of the artificial, Cambridge.
185. Smith, A.T., 2004: The end of the essential archaeological subject, Archaeological dialogues 11, 1-19.
186. Sokal, A., and J. Bricmont, 1997: Impostures intellectuelles, Paris.
187. Spaulding, A., 1960: The dimensions of archaeology, in G. Dole and R. Carneiro (eds), Essays in the science of culture in honor of Leslie A. White, New York, 437-56.
188. Spector, J., 1993: What this awl means. Feminist archaeology at a Dakota Sioux village, St Paul.
189. Steinmetz, G., 2005: The politics of method in the human sciences. Positivism and its epistemological others, Durham.
190. Sutton, Mark Q., and Robert M. Yohe II, 2006: Archaeology. The science of the human past, 2nd edn, Boston.
191. Tarlow, S., 2000: Emotion in archaeology, Current anthropology 41, 713-45.
192. Taylor, S., 1990: Brothers in arms? Feminism, post-structuralism and the 'rise of civilisation', in F. Baker and J. Thomas (eds), Writing the past in the present, Lampeter, 32-41.
193. Thomas, D.H., 1998: Archaeology, London.
194. Thomas, David Hurst and Robert L. Kelly, 2006: Archaeology, 4th edn, Belmont, CA.
195. Thomas, David Hurst and Robert L. Kelly, 2007: Archaeology. Down to earth, 3rd edn, Belmont, CA.
196. Thomas, J., 1991: Rethinking the Neolithic, Cambridge.
197. Thomas, J., 1993a: The hermeneutics of megalithic space, in C. Tilley (ed.), Interpretative archaeology, Oxford, 73-97.
198. Thomas, J., 1993b: The politics of vision and archaeologies of landscape, in B. Bender (ed.), Landscape. Politics and perspectives, Oxford, 19-48.
199. Thomas, J., 1996: Time, culture and identity. An interpretative archaeology, London.
200. Thomas, J., 2000: Reconfiguring the social, reconfiguring the material, in M.B. Schiffer (ed.), Social theory in archaeology, Salt Lake City, 143-55.
201. Thomas, J., 2004: Archaeology and modernity, London.
202. Tilley, C., 1994: A Phenomenology of landscape. Places, paths, and monuments, Oxford.
203. Tilley, C. (ed.), 1990: Reading material culture, Oxford.
204. Tilley, C., 2004a: The materiality of stone, Oxford.
205. Tilley, C., 2004b: Round barrows and dykes as landscape metaphors, Cambridge archaeological journal 14, 185-203.
206. Tilley, C., S. Hamilton and B. Bender, 2000: Art and the re-presentation of the past, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, NS 6, 36-62.
207. Todd, J., 1988: Feminist literary history. A defence, Oxford.
208. Toll, John S., 2006: Science in university education, paper given at the Fourteenth Cosmos Club Spring Symposium, 'Science in America's Future'. Cosmos Club, Washington, DC, 1 April 2006. Notes taken by the author.
209. Toulmin, S., 1972: Human understanding. The collective use and evolution of concepts, Princeton.
210. Trigger, B.G., 1980: Archaeology and the image of the American Indian, American antiquity 45, 662-76.
211. Trigger, B.G., 1989: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.
212. Trigger, M.B., 1984: Alternative archaeologies. Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, Man 19, 355-70.
213. Tringham, R., 1991: Households with faces. The challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remains, in J. Gero and M. Conkey (eds), Engendering archaeology. Women and prehistory, Oxford, 93-131.
214. Tringham, R., 2000: Expressing the feminist practice of archaeology through hypermedia opera, in M. Conkey and A. Wylie (eds), Practicing archaeology as a feminist, Santa Fe, NM.
215. VanPool, C.S., and T.L. VanPool, 1999: The scientific nature of postprocessualism, American antiquity 64, 33-54.
216. Varien, M.D., and R.H. Wilshusen, 2002: A partnership for understanding the past. Crow Canyon Research in the Central Mesa Verde region, in M.D. Varien and R.H. Wilshusen (eds), Seeking the center place. Archaeology and ancient communities in the Mesa Verde region, Salt Lake City, 3-23.
217. Veit, U., 2004: 'Mission impossible!' Comment on Kristian Kristiansen, 'Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology', Archeological dialogues 11, 99-103.
218. Vico, G., 2001 [1744]: New science (tr. D. Marsh), London.
219. Vitelli, K.D., and C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, 2006: Archaeological ethics, 2nd edn, Lanham.
220. Wallace, J., 2004: Digging the dirt. Archaeology and the Romantic imagination, London.
221. Witmore, C., 2004: Four archaeological engagements with place. Mediating bodily experience through peripatetic video, Visual anthropology review 20(2), 57-72.
222. Williams, R., 1973: The city and the country, London.
223. Williams, R., 1976: Keywords. A vocabulary of culture and society, London.
224. Wogaman, J. Philip, 2006: Faith and science, paper given at the Fourteenth Cosmos Club Spring Symposium, 'Science in America's Future', Cosmos Club, Washington, DC, 1 April 2006. Notes taken by the author.
225. Wylie, A., 1992: The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests. Recent archaeological research on gender, American antiquity 57, 15-35.
226. Yamin, R. (ed.), 2001: Becoming New York. The Five Points Neighbourhood, themed issue, Historical Archaeology 35(3).
227. Yoffee, N., and A. Sherratt (eds), 1993: Archaeological theory. Who sets the agenda? Cambridge.