The salience of race and gender in pretrial release decisions: A comparison across multiple jurisdictions

Criminal Justice Policy Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 491-502

  Maxwell, Sheila Royo ^a   Davis, Jessica S ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750189145     PISSN: 08874034     EISSN: 15523586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/088740349901000402     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Albonetti, C., Hauser, R.M., Hagan, J., & Nagel, I.H. (1989). Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 57-82.
2. Bernat, F.P. (1984). Gender disparity in the setting of bail: Prostitution offenses in Buffalo, NY 1977. Gender Issues, Sex Offenses, and Criminal Justice, 21-47.
3. Clarke, S., H., & Koch, G.G. (1976). The influence of income and other factors on whether criminal defendants go to prison. Law and Society Review, 11, 57-92.
4. Daly, K. (1987). Discrimination in the criminal courts; family gender and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66, 152-175.
5. Daly, K. (1989). Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice; intersection of race, gender and family in criminal justice. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 156-168.
6. Holmes, M.D., Daudistal, H.C., & Farrell, R.A. (1987). Determinants of charge reductions and final dispositions in cases in burglary and robbery. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 233-254.
7. Katz, C.M., & Spohn, C.C. (1995). The effect of race and gender and bail outcomes: A test of an interactive model. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 161-184.
8. Kruttschnitt, C. (1984). Sex and criminal court dispositions: The unresolved controversy. Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 213-232.
9. Kruttschnitt, C., & Green, D. (1984). The sex-sanctioning issue: is it history? American Sociological Review, 49, 541-551.
10. Maxwell, S. (1999). Examining the congruence between ROR and Failures-to-Appear Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(2), 127-142.
11. Nagel, I. (1983). The legal/extralegal controversy: Judicial decisions in pretrial release. Law and Society, 17, 481-515.
12. Reaves, B.A., & Smith, P.Z. (1995). Felony defendants in large urban counties 1992 [NCJ-148826]. National Pretrial Reporting Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics (47).
13. Steury, E., & Frank, N. (1990). Gender bias and pretrial release: More pieces of the puzzle. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 417-432.
14. U.S. Department of Justice, B. O. J. S. (Principal Investigators). (1992). National Prosecutors Survey, 1990 [Computer File]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.