Comparative analysis between manufacturing and construction enterprises on the use of formalized quality management systems

Journal of Industrial Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  McCrary, Steven W ^a   Smith, Rathel R ^a   Callahan, R Neal ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750166776     PISSN: 08826404     EISSN: 08826404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. ACCE (2006). Document 103: Standards And Criteria For Accreditation Of Postsecondary Construction Education Degree Programs, San Antonio, Texas: American Council for Construction Education, down-loaded May 13, 2006, from http://www.acce-hq.org/documents.htm, p. 15.
2. Aoieong, R. T., Tang, S. L., & Ahmed, S. M. (2002). A Process Approach in Measuring Quality Costs of Construction Projects: Model Development. Construction Management and Economics, 20, 179-192.
3. Construction Industry Institute. (1994a). In SP31-1: Implementing TQM in Engineering & Construction. Austin, TX.
4. Construction Industry Institute. (1994b). In SP36-2: The Blueprint: A Process for Measuring Project Quality. Austin, TX.
5. th Annual Conference. Fort Collins, Colorado: The Associated Schools of Construction, from http://www.ascjournal.ascweb.org/index.html.
6. Kemenade, E. & Garre, P. (2000, September). Teach What You Preach. Quality Progress, 33, 33-39.
7. th edition. Wiley, New York.
8. National Association of Industrial Technology 2006 Accreditation Handbook. National Association of Industrial Technology, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
9. PATH (2003). In Making the Quality Connection: Improving the Building Industry Insurance Situation Through Quality Assurance Programs. Washington, D.C: Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing (PATH). Retrieved June 20, 2005, from www.pathnet.org.
10. nd edition.. Knoxville, TN: SPC Press, Inc.