NaCl effects growth, ions and water status of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings

Acta Botanica Gallica

Volumn 153, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 297-307

  Debouba, Mohamed ^a   Gouia, Houda ^a   Ghorbel, Mohamed Habib ^a  

^a FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES DE TUNIS   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Chloride; Growth; Nitrate; Potassium; Salinity; Sodium; Tomato

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 33750166666     PISSN: 12538078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12538078.2006.10515548     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abdel-Baki, G. K., Siefritz, F., Man, H. M., Weiner, H., Haidenhoff, R., and Kaiser, W. M., 2000. Nitrate reductase in Zea mays L under salinity. Plant Cell Envir., 23:515–521.
2. + uptake by plant cells. Adv. Bot. Research, 29:75–112.
3. Cakirlar, H., and Bowling, D. J.F., 1981. The effect of the salinity on the membrane potential of sunflower roots. J. Exp. Bot., 32:479–487.
4. Drew, M. C., and Lächli, A., 1987. The role of mesocotyl in sodium exclusion from the shoot of Zea mays L. (cv.Pioneer 3906). J. Exp. Bot., 38:409–418.
5. Fleury and Ledere. 1943. La méthode nitro-vanadomolybdique de mission pour le dosage colorimétrique du phosphore. Son intérêt en biochimie. Bull. Chimie et Biologie, 2:201–205.
6. Flores, H. E., and Galston, A. W., 1984. Osmotic stress-induced polyamine accumulation in cereal leaves. II—Relation to amino acid pools. Plant Physiol., 75:110–113.
7. Flowers, T. J., and Yeo, A. R., 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants. Where next?. Austr. J. Plant Physiol., 22:875–884.
8. Garg, A. K., Kim, J. K., Owens, T. G., Ranwala, A. P., Choi, Y. D., Kochian, L. V., and Wu, R. J., 2002. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 99:15898–15903.
9. +-pump. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 98:11444–11449.
10. + discrimination in wheat. New Phytol., 137:109–116.
11. − reduction rate within whole plants of salt-sensitive Bean and salt-tolerant Cotton. Plant Physiol., 105:1409–1418.
12. Greenway, H., and Munns, R., 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Ann. Review Plant Physiol., 31:149–190.
13. Hunt, R., 1990. Basic growth analysis. Plant growth analysis for beginners. Academic Press, London 112
14. Laurie, S., Feeney, K. A., Maathuis, F. J.M., Heard, P. J., Brown, S. J., and Leigh, R. A., 2002. A role for HKT1 in sodium uptake by wheat roots. Plant J., 32:139–149.
15. Liu, W., Fairbairn, D. J., Reid, R. J., and Schachtman, D. P., 2001. Characterization of two HKT1 homologues from Eucalyptus camaldulensis that display intrinsic osmosensing capability. Plant Physiol., 127:283–294.
16. Liu, J., and Zhu, J. K., 1998. A calcium sensor homology required for plant salt tolerance. Science, 280:1943–1945.
17. + ratios. Ann. Bot., 84:123–133.
18. Maria, L. B., Hess, F. D., Bressan, R. A., and Hasegawa, P. M., 1988. Intracellular compartmentation of ions in salt adapted tobacco cells. Plant Physiol., 86:607–614.
19. Munns, R., and Termaat, A., 1986. Whole plant responses to salinity. Austr. J. Plant Physiol., 3:143–160.
20. Niu, X., Bressan, R. A., Hasegawa, P. M., and Pardo, J. M., 1995. Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol., 109:735–742.
21. PeukeA, D., and Jeschke, W. D., 1999. The characterization of inhibition of net nitrate uptake by salt in salt-tolerant barley (Hordeum vulgare L.cv. Califonia Mariout). J. Exper. Bot., 50:1365–1372.
22. Pilbeam, D. J., and Kirkby, E. A., 1990. “ The physiology of nitrate uptake. ”. In Nitrogen in Higher Plant. Edited by:Abrol, Y. P., 39–64. New York:Research studies Press LTD.
23. Prat, D., and Fathi-Ettai, R. A., 1990. Variation in organic and mineral components in young Eucalyptus seedlings under saline stress. Physiol. Plantarum, 79:479–486.
24. Richardson, S. G., and McCree, K. J., 1985. Carbon balance and water relation of sorghum exposed to salt stress and water stress. Plant Physiol., 79:1015–1020.
25. Rubio, F., Gassmann, W., and Schroeder, J. I., 1995. Sodium driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science, 270:1660–1663.
26. + entry into plant roots. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 98:14150–14155.
27. Shabala, S., 2000. Ionic and osmotic components of salt stress specifically modulate net ion fluxes from bean leaf mesophyl. Plant Cell Envir., 23:825–837.
28. + antiporter improves salt tolerance in. Arabidopsis. Nature Biotechnology, 21:81–85.
29. + transport in plant. Plant Cell, 14:465–477.
30. + antiporter gene AtNHX1 by salt stress and ABA. Plant Mol. Biol., 50:543–550.
31. Soltani, A., 1988. Analyse des effets du chlorure de sodium et de la source d'azote sur la nutrition minérale de l'orge. Thèse Doctorat d'État, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis 322
32. −) and osmolarity in ion and proline accumulation, nitrate reductase activity, and growth performance of lettuce. J. Plant Nutrition, 25:27–41.
33. + in salinity toxicity:quantitative resolution of multiple toxic and ameliorative effects. J. Exper. Bot., 50:1495–1505.
34. Yeo, A. R., 1983. Salinity resistance:physiologies and prices. Physiol. Plantarum, 58:214–222.
35. Zhang, H. X., N Hodson, J., P Williams, J., and Blumwald, E., 2001. Engineering salt- tolerant Brassica plants:characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 98:12832–12836.
36. Zhu, J. K., 2003. “ Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. ”. In Current Opinion of Plant Biology 441–445.