The New Electricity Market of Singapore: Regulatory framework, market power and competition

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 403-412

  Chang, Youngho ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Lerner index; Market power; Vesting contracts

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; MARKETING;

LERNER INDEX; MARKET POWER; VESTING CONTRACTS;

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY;

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;

ASIA; EURASIA; SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA]; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 33750148070     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.036     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anex R.P. Restructuring and privatizing electricity industries in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 397-408
2. Arocena P., Contin I., and Huerta E. Price regulation in the Spanish energy sectors: Who benefits. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 885-895
3. Ballonoff, P., 1997. Energy: Ending the Never-ending Crisis, Cato Institute.
4. Besant-Jones, J., Tenenbaum, B., 2001. The California power crisis: lessons for developing countries. Energy & Mining Sector Board Discussion Paper Series, Paper No.1.
5. Bohi, D.R., 1981. Analyzing demand behavior: a study of energy elasticities. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
6. Brennan T.J., Palmer K., and Martinez S. Implementing electricity restructuring. Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (2002) 99-132
7. Cabral L. The California energy crisis. Japan and the World Economy 14 (2002) 335-339
8. Carlton DennisW., and Perloff J.M. Modern Industrial Organization. third ed (2000), Addison-Wesley, New York
9. Chang, Y., Tay, T.H., 2004. Price responsiveness in the new electricity market: a Singapore experience. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Second International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT 2004), Hong Kong, China.
10. Clark W.W. The California challenge: energy and the environmental consequences for public utilities. Utilities Policy 10 (2001) 57-61
11. Crew M., and Schuh J. Markets, Pricing, and Deregulation of Utilities (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
12. Daniel T.P. Where Herfindahls can lead you astray: An analysis of FERC's approach to vertical mergers. Electricity Journal 13 (2000) 69-74
13. Energy Market Authority (EMA) Singapore, 2003. Annual Report 2003/04.
14. Energy Market Authority (EMA) Singapore, 2004. Introduction to the Singapore New Electricity Market.
15. FERC (US Federal Energy Regulation Commission), 2004. Order on Rehearing and Modifying Interim Generation Market Power Analysis and Mitigation Policy. Docket No. ER96-2495-016.
16. Joskow, P.L., 2001. California's electricity crisis. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 8442.
17. Lerner A.P. The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. Review of Economic Studies 1 (1934) 157-175
18. PowerSeraya Website. ≪www.powerseraya.com.sg≫.
19. Rothkopf M.H. Control of market power in electricity auctions. Electricity Journal 15 (2002) 15-24
20. SembCorp Cogen Website. ≪www.sembutilities.com.sg/sub/cogen/main.htm≫.
21. Senoko Power Website. www.senokopower.com.sg.
22. Sheffrin, A., 2001. Preliminary study of reserve margin requirements necessary to promote workable competition. Mimeo, Market Analysis, CAISO.
23. Singapore Energy Market Authority Website. www.ema.gov.sg.
24. Singapore Energy Market Company Website. www.emcsg.com.
25. Singapore Power Ltd Website. www.spower.com.sg.
26. Sioshansi F.P. California's electricity market: Finally turning the corner?. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 245-248
27. Steiner, F., 2000. Regulation, industry structure and performance in the electricity supply industry. OECD Economic Department Working Papers No. 238.
28. Stoft, S., 2002. Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
29. The Straits Times, 2004. PowerSeraya to Lay of 110 Workers. 25 February 2004.
30. Tuas Power Website. ≪www.tuaspower.com.sg≫.
31. Viscusi W.K., Harrington J.E., and Vernon J.M. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. Fourth ed (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge
32. Wolak F.A. An empirical analysis of the impact of hedge contracts on bidding behavior in a competitive electricity market. International Economic Journal 14 (2000) 1-39
33. Wolfram C.D. Measuring duopoly power in the British electricity spot market. American Economic Review 89 (1999) 805-826
34. Woo C.-K., Lloyd D., and Tishler A. Electricity market reform failures: UK, Norway, Alberta and California. Energy Policy 31 (2003) 1103-1115