Out of crime and into treatment?: The criminalization of contemporary drug policy since Tackling Drugs Together

Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 409-415

  Duke, Karen ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crime; Criminal justice; Illicit drugs; Policy; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750138728     PISSN: 09687637     EISSN: 14653370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09687630600613520     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. ACOP (Association of Chief Officers of Probation) (1995). ACOP response to Tackling Drugs Together. Wakefield, UK: ACOP.
2. ACPO (Association of Chief Officers of Police) (1995). Government Green Paper 'Tackling Drugs Together': The response of the Police Service in England. Wakefield, UK: ACPO.
3. ADSS (Association of Directors of Social Services) (1995). Tackling Drugs Together: Response of the Association of Directors of Social Services. Salford, UK: ADSS.
4. All Party Parliamentary Drugs Misuse Group (1995). Comments from the All-Party Parliamentary Drugs Misuse Group on the Government's Consultation Document, 'Tackling Drugs Together'. London: House of Lords.
5. Barnes, M. (2004). Speech on drug treatment 2004. London: DrugScope.
6. Barton, A., & Quinn, C. (2002). Risk management of groups or respect for the individual? Issues for information sharing and confidentiality in Drug Treatment and Testing Orders, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 9, 35-43.
7. Bennett, T. (1998). Drugs and crime: The results of research on drug testing and interviewing arrestees. Home Office Research Study 183. London: Home Office.
8. Blagg, H., Pearson, G., Sampson, A., Smith, D., & Stubbs, P. (1988). Inter-agency co-operation: Rhetoric and reality. In T. Hope & M. Shaw (Eds.), Communities and crime reduction (pp. 204-220). London: HMSO.
9. Crawford, A. (1997). The local governance of crime: Appeals to community and partnerships. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
10. Crawford, A. (1998). Crime prevention and community safety. London: Longman.
11. Department for Education and Skills (2004). Drugs: Guidance for schools. London: DFES.
12. Duke, K. (2003). Drugs, prisons and policy-making. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
13. Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Edwards, C., Wilson, A., Segar, G., Stewart, D. et al. (1995). The National Treatment Outcome Research Study: A report prepared for the task-force. London: Department of Health.
14. H. M. Government (1995). Tackling drugs together: A strategy for England 1995-1998 (CM 2846). London: HMSO.
15. H. M. Government (1998). Tackling drugs to build a better Britain: The government's ten year strategy for tackling drugs misuse (CM 3945). London: HMSO.
16. H. M. Government (2002). Updated drug strategy 2002. London: Home Office.
17. Home Office Drug Strategy Directorate (2004). Tackling drugs. Changing lives. Keeping communities safe from drugs (Drug Strategy Progress Report 2004). London: Home Office Drug Strategy Directorate.
18. Hough, M., Clancy, A., McSweeney, T., & Turnbull, P. (2003) The impact of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders on offending: Two-year reconviction results (Home Office Findings 184). London: Home Office.
19. Howard, R., Beadle, P., & Maitland, J. (1994). Across the divide: Building community partnerships to tackle drug misuse. London: Department of Health.
20. Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2004). Drug testing in the workplace: The report of the Independent Inquiry into Drug Testing at Work. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
21. Labour Party (1996). Breaking the vicious circle: Labour's proposals to tackle drug related crime. London: Labour Party.
22. LDPF (London Drug Policy Forum) (1995). 'Tackling Drugs Together': Joint response from the London Drugs Policy Forum, Association of London Authorities and the London Boroughs Association and the London Borough's Grants Committee. London: LDPF.
23. LGDF (Local Government Drugs Forum) (1995). Response to the Green Paper 'Tackling Drugs Together'. London: LGDF.
24. National Audit Office (2004). The Drug Treatment and Testing Order: Early lessons (Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 366 Session 2003-2004: 26 March 2004). London: National Audit Office.
25. Phoenix House (1995). A response to the consultation paper from Phoenix House. London: Phoenix House.
26. Quinn, C., & Barton, A. (2000). The implications of the drug treatment and testing orders. The Nursing Standard, 14, 38-41.
27. Release (1995). 'Tackling Drugs Together': Response to the Government Green Paper. London: Release, the National Drugs and Legal Advice Service.
28. SCODA (Standing Conference on Drug Abuse) (1995). Tackling Drugs Together: A response from drug service providers. London: SCODA.
29. Stenson, K., & Factor, F. (1994). Youth work, risk and crime prevention. Youth and Policy, 45, 1-15.
30. Stevens, A., Trace, M., & Bewley-Taylor, D. (2005). Reducing drug related crime: An overview of the global evidence (Report 5). London: The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Foundation.
31. Turning Point (1995). A response to the Green Paper 'Tackling Drugs Together'. London: Turning Point.