Sector-based analysis of the distribution of the neuroretinal rim by confocal scanning laser in the diagnosis of glaucoma;Análisis de la distribución de anillo neurorretiniano por sectores mediante láser confocal de barrido en el diagnóstico del glaucoma

Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 135-140

  Pueyo, V ^a   Larrosa, J M ^a   Polo, V ^a   Perez Inigo A ^a   Ferreras, A ^a   Honrubia, F M ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Glaucoma; HRT; Optic nerve head

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33750132269     PISSN: 03656691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe E, Gomamsca S, Vavasori M, Orzalesi N. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regresión analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136:26-33.
2. Miglior S, Casula M, Guareschi M, Marchetti I, Iester M, Orzalesi N. Clinical ability of Heidelberg retina tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1621-1627.
3. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, Hitchings RA. Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 2272-2277.
4. Iester M, De Ferrari R, Zanini M. Topographic analysis to discriminate glaucomatous from normal optic nerve heads wilh a canfocal scanning laser: new optic disc analysis without any observer input. Surv Ophthalmol 1999; 44: S33-S40.
5. Teesalu P, Vihanninjoki K, Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Laara E. Correlation of blue-on-yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 2452-2459.
6. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT. LeBlanc RP. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1492-1499.
7. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557-1563.
8. Mardin CY, Horn FK, Jonas JB, Budde WM. Preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis by confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic disc. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 299-304.
9. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, Hao J, Chan K, Lee TW, et al. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2255-2262.
10. Kesen M, Spaeth GL, Henderer JD, Pereira ML, Smith AF, Steinmann WC. The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph vs clinical impression in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 613-616.
11. Hatch WV, Flanagan JG, Williams-Lyn DE, Buys YM, Farra T, Trope GE. Interobserver agreement of Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma 1999; 8: 232-237.
12. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Wollstein G, Viswanathan A, Kamal D, Fontana L, et al. Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 664-669.
13. Janknecht P, Funk J. Optic nerve head analyser and Heidelberg retina tomograph: accuracy and reproducibility of topographic measurements in a model eye and in volunteers. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 760-768.
14. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bawd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeler, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 827-837.
15. Sanchez-Galeana C, Bowd C, Blumenthal EZ, Gokhale PA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1812-1818.
16. O'Connor DJ, Zeyen T, Caprioli J. Comparison of methods to detect glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 1498-1503.
17. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110: 1145-1150.
18. Mikelberg F, Parfitt C, Swindale N. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995; 4: 242-247.
19. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 1998; 7: 121-127.