Initial risk-based screening of potential brownfield development sites

Soil and Sediment Contamination

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 463-470

  O'Reilly, Mary ^a   Brink, Ronald ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Broome County Department of Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Brownfields; Health risk assessment; Redevelopment

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RISKS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

BROWNFIELD DEVELOPMENT SITES; HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC DISCUSSION;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33750120775     PISSN: 15320383     EISSN: 15497887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15320380600846916     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bernstein, P.L. 1998. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
2. DeSousa, C.A. 2003. Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto. Landscape and Planning 62, 181-198.
3. EMC (Environmental Management Council) Brownfields Committee and EMC Staff. 2004. Brownfields Inventory and Ranking Project Summary Report. Broome County, New York. www.gobroomecounty.com/emc.
4. Jayjock, M.A., Lynch, J.R., and Nelson, D.I. 2000. Risk Assessment Principles for the Practicing Industrial Hygienist. Fairfax, VA, AIHA (American Industrial Hygiene Association) Press.
5. Lee, J.S., Lillquist, D.R., and Sullivan, F.J. 1997. Risk communication in the workplace. In: The Occupational Environment-Its Evaluation and Control, pp. 1110-1123, DiNardi, S.R., ed., Fairfax, VA, AIHA (American Industrial Hygiene Association) Press.
6. Litt, J.S., Nga, L.T., and Burke, T.A. 2002. Examining urban brownfields through the public health "macroscope." Environmental Health Perspectives 110, 183-193.
7. Meyer, P.R. 2000. Looking at State Voluntary Cleanup Programs in Perspective: Liability Relief, Flexible Cleanup Standards and Institutional Controls as Forms of Economic Development Subsidies. Center for Environmental Policy and Management, Kentucky Institute for the Environment and Sustainable Development, University of Louisville.
8. USEPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Summary of Recent Improvements in Methods for the Study of Contaminated and Potentially Contaminated Sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, 20460. EPA-68-W5-0055.
9. USEPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Quality Assurance Guidance for Conduction Brownfields Site Assessments. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, 20460. EPA 540-R-98-038.
10. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Public Policies and Private Decisions Affecting the Redevelopment of Brownfields: An Analysis of Critical Factors, Relative Weights and Area Differentials. George Washington University, Washington, DC.
11. USEPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004. Improving Sampling, Analysis, and Data Management for Site Investigation and Cleanup. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC. EPA-542-F-04-001a.
12. Wright, J.S. 1997. Risks and Rewards of Brownfield Redevelopment. Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.