Redeployable CCTV and drug-related crime: A case of implementation failure

Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 451-460

  Gill, Martin ^a   Rose, Anthea ^a   Collins, Kate ^a   Hemming, Martin ^a  

^a Perpetuity Research and Consultancy International (PRCI) Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CCTV; Crime prevention; Drugs

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750111737     PISSN: 09687637     EISSN: 14653370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09687630600737188     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Armitage, R. (2002). To CCTV or not to CCTV? A review of current research into the effectiveness of CCTV systems in reducing crime. London: NACRO.
2. Bennett, T., & Gelthsthorpe, L. (1996). Public attitudes to CCTV in public places. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 5(1), 72-90.
3. Ditton, J. (2000). Crime and the city: Public attitudes towards open-street CCTV in Glasgow. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 692-709.
4. Gill, M. (Ed.). (2003). CCTV. Leicester: Perpetuity Press.
5. Gill, M. (2006). CCTV: Is it effective? In M. Gill (Ed.), The handbook of security. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
6. Gill, M., & Loveday, K. (2003). What offenders think about CCTV? In M. Gill (Ed.), CCTV. Leicester: Perpetuity Press.
7. Gill, M., Rose, A., & Collins, K. (2005b). A good practice guide for the implementation of redeployable CCTV (Home Office Online Report 16.05). London: Home Office (http:// www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/rdsolr1605.pdf).
8. Gill, M., & Spriggs, A. (2005). Assessing the impact of CCTV (Research Study 292). London: Home Office (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/ pdfs05/hors292.pdf).
9. Gill, M., Spriggs, A., Allen, J., Argomaniz, J., Bryan, J., Hemming, M. et al. (2005a). The impact of CCTV: Fourteen case studies (Home Office Online Report). London: Home Office.
10. Home Office (2002). Updated drug strategy, tackling drugs. London: Home Office.
11. Honess, T., & Charman, E. (1992). Closed circuit television in public spaces: Its acceptability and perceived effectiveness (Crime Prevention Unit Paper 35). London: Home Office.
12. Lupton, R., Wilson, A., May, T., Warburton, H., & Turnbull, P. (2002). A rock and a hard place: Drug markets in deprived neighbourhoods (Home Office Research Study 240). London: Home Office.
13. Mason, M., & Bucke, T. (2002). Evaluating actions against local drug markets: A 'systematic' review of research. The Police Journal, 75, 15-30.
14. McCahill, M., & Norris, C. (2003). Estimating the extent, sophistication and legality of CCTV in London. In M. Gill (Ed.), CCTV. Leicester: Perpetuity Press.
15. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
16. Phillips, C. (1999). A review of CCTV evaluations: Crime reduction effects and attitudes towards its use. In K. Painter & N. Tilley (Eds.), Surveillance of public space: CCTV, street lighting and crime prevention (Crime Prevention Series No. 10). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
17. Smith, P., Spriggs, A., Argomaniz, J., Allen, J., Jessiman, P., Kara, D. et al. (2003). Lessons in implementing CCTV schemes: An early review. In M. Gill (Ed.), CCTV. Leicester: Perpetuity Press.
18. Waples, S., & Gill, M. (2006). The effectiveness of redeployable CCTV. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 8(1), 1-16.